Abstract
In this paper we prove three theorems about the theory of Borel sets in models of ZF without any form of the axiom of choice. We prove that if \({B\subseteq 2^\omega}\) is a G δσ -set then either B is countable or B contains a perfect subset. Second, we prove that if 2ω is the countable union of countable sets, then there exists an F σδ set \({C\subseteq 2^\omega}\) such that C is uncountable but contains no perfect subset. Finally, we construct a model of ZF in which we have an infinite Dedekind finite \({D\subseteq 2^\omega}\) which is F σδ .
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cohen, P.J.: Set theory and the continuum hypothesis. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York-Amsterdam (1966) pp. vi+154
Creed P., Truss J.K.: On o-amorphous sets. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 101(2-3), 185–226 (2000)
Creed P., Truss J.K.: On quasi-amorphous sets. Arch. Math. Log. 40(8), 581–596 (2001)
De la Cruz O.: Finiteness and choice. Fund. Math. 173(1), 57–76 (2002)
Downey R., Slaman Theodore A.: On co-simple isols and their intersection types. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 56(1–3), 221–237 (1992)
Ellentuck E.: The universal properties of Dedekind finite cardinals. Ann. Math. 82(2), 225–248 (1965)
Herrlich, H.: Axiom of choice. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (2006). pp. xiv+194. ISBN: 978-3-540-30989-5
Howard Paul E., Yorke Mary F.: Definitions of finite. Fund. Math. 133(3), 169–177 (1989)
Jech, T.J.: The Axiom of Choice. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 75. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-London; Amercan Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc., New York (1973), pp. xi+202
Kechris, A.S.: Classical Descriptive set Theory’s Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 156. Springer-Verlag, New York (1995,) pp. xviii+402
Lévy A.: The independence of various definitions of finiteness. Fund. Math. 46, 1–13 (1958)
Mendick G.S., Truss J.K.: A notion of rank in set theory without choice. Arch. Math. Log. 42(2), 165–178 (2003)
Miller Arnold W.: Long Borel hierarchies. Math. Log. Q. 54, 301–316 (2008)
McCarty C.: Markov’s principle, isols and Dedekind finite sets. J. Symb. Log. 53(4), 1042–1069 (1988)
Maddy P.: Believing the axioms. I. J. Symb. Log. 53(2), 481–511 (1988)
Moore, G.H.: Zermelo’s Axiom of Choice. Its Origins, Development, and Influence. Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, 8. Springer-Verlag, New York (1982). pp. xiv+410
Monro G.P.: Independence results concerning Dedekind-finite sets. J. Austral. Math. Soc. 19, 35–46 (1975)
Truss J.K.: Classes of Dedekind finite cardinals. Fund. Math. 84(3), 187–208 (1974)
Truss J.K.: The structure of amorphous sets. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 73(2), 191–233 (1995)
Walczak-Typke A.C.: The first-order structure of weakly Dedekind-finite sets. J. Symb. Log. 70(4), 1161–1170 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, A.W. A dedekind finite borel set. Arch. Math. Logic 50, 1–17 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-010-0195-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-010-0195-6