Skip to main content

Minimum working age and the gender mortality gap

Abstract

In 1980, a few years after its democratization process, Spain raised the minimum working age from 14 to 16, while the compulsory education age remained at 14. This reform changed the within-cohort incentives to remain in the educational system. We use a difference-in-differences approach, where our treated and control individuals only differ in their month of birth, to analyze the gender asymmetries in mortality generated by this change. The reform decreased mortality at ages 14–29 among men by 6.4% and women by 8.9%, mainly from a reduction in deaths due to traffic accidents. However, the reform also increased mortality for women ages 30–45 by 7%. This is driven by increases in HIV mortality, as well as by diseases related to the nervous and circulatory systems. We show that women’s health habits deteriorated as a consequence of the reform, while this was not the case for men. The gender differences in the impact of the reform on smoking and drinking should be understood in the context of the gender equalization process that affected women were experiencing when the reform took place. All in all, these patterns help explain the narrowing age gap in life expectancy between women and men in many developed countries while, at the same time, they provide important policy implications for middle-income countries that are undergoing those gender equalization processes right now.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

These figures show the tobacco and alcohol consumption of women and men born between 1944 and 1964 observed in 2009 by level of education. Source: European Survey of Health in Spain (2009)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Notes

  1. Biologically, women are more likely to suffer from acute illness and nonfatal chronic conditions (arthritis, constipation, thyroid conditions, gall bladder conditions, headaches, and migraines), while men are more likely to suffer from life-threatening chronic diseases (coronary heart disease, cancers, cerebrovascular disease, emphysema, liver cirrhosis, and kidney disease) (Bird and Rieker 1999; Case and Paxson 2005). Hormonal, autoimmune, and genetic factors can explain these gender differences (Oksuzyan et al. 2008; Schünemann et al. 2018).

  2. Women also used to eat better (Wardle et al. 2004) and use health care services more often than men (Sindelar 1982; Schünemann et al. 2018).

  3. In the Spanish educational system, all children from the same cohort start school the same year. Consequently, children born at the beginning of the year turn 14 during the final year of primary education, while those born at the end of the year are still 13 years old.

  4. The literature has shown that AIDS (De Olalla García et al. 1999; Gómez-Redondo and Boe 2005), drugs and alcohol abuse (Ribes et al. 2004), and fatal traffic injuries (Saiz-Sánchez et al. 1999; Gine 1992; Puig et al. 1983; Gómez-Redondo and Boe 2005; Serra et al. 2006) all peaked during the late 1970s and early 1980s, especially for young cohorts.

  5. Lleras-Muney (2002) and Goldin and Katz (2011) examine the effects that compulsory schooling and child labor laws from 1910 to 1939 have on educational attainment in the USA. While Lleras-Muney (2002) finds that legislation increased the educational attainment of individuals at the lowest percentile in the distribution of education, Goldin and Katz (2011) report that the reform has only a positive but modest impact on secondary schooling rates. Edmonds and Shrestha (2012) analyze the effect of a statutory minimum school-leaving age on child labor and schooling in 59 mostly low-income countries. However, they find that minimum age regulations are barely enforced in such countries. It is important to note that child labor in low-income countries might be vital for family subsistence. If this is the case, child labor regulations might simply divert children from formal jobs to informal jobs, without reducing their rate of employment.

  6. On the one hand, Lleras-Muney (2005) for the USA, Oreopoulos (2006), for the UK, and Kippersluis et al. (2011) for the Netherlands find that educational attainment has a strong positive impact on mortality rates. Nevertheless, Clark and Royer (2013) using two compulsory schooling reforms in the UK do not find any significant effect of education on such rates. Meghir et al. (2018) and Albouy and Lequien (2009) do not find any causal impact of schooling on mortality rates either in Sweden or in France, respectively.

  7. Oreopoulos (2006) examines two changes in the school leaving age that were enacted in the UK in 1947 and 1957. Clark and Royer (2013) have also explored the UK reform of 1947 and a further reform in 1972. Lleras-Muney (2005) has analyzed two reforms in the USA in 1915 and 1939. Meghir et al. (2018) has estimated the 1-year increase in the length of compulsory schooling that was enacted in Sweden between 1949 and 1962. Finally, Albouy and Lequien (2009) have analyzed two reforms in France in 1923 and 1953.

  8. For more information on this database, please go to the Data Appendix that you can find in our working paper (https://www.crctr224.de/en/research-output/discussion-papers/archive/2020/unintended-health-costs-of-gender-equalization-cristina-belles-obrero-sergi-jimenez-martin-judit-vall-castello-current-versionhere).

  9. Results are mostly robust when comparing individuals born between January and July with individuals born between August and December. Please see Tables 3 and 4, and Tables A10, A11, A12 and A13 in our working paper (that can be found https://www.crctr224.de/en/research-output/discussion-papers/archive/2020/unintended-health-costs-of-gender-equalization-cristina-belles-obrero-sergi-jimenez-martin-judit-vall-castello-current-versionhere).

  10. In Section 4.1, we relax the assumption that the 1964 and 1965 cohorts were not affected at all by the reform.

  11. These results are available upon request.

  12. In Fig. 11, we replicate our main results for the short-term and medium-term effects using different age brackets.

  13. Figure 10 in the Appendix shows the same graphs but for men’s and women’s mortality rate by cause of death.

  14. Note that the pre-reform mortality rate for young individuals differs significantly between genders. There is a mortality rate of 1.1 per 1000 men (aged 14–29) before the reform, while the same rate for women of the same age is 0.39 per 1000 women.

  15. This estimate remains significant even when controlling for the false discovery rate (FDR).

  16. This classification includes deaths due to traffic accidents, other accidents (accidental falls, drowning, accidents with fire, or accidental poisoning), suicide, homicide, surgical and medical complications, and other types of external causes of mortality.

  17. This classification includes deaths due to malignant tumors located in different parts of the body.

  18. This classification includes deaths due to chronic rheumatic heart diseases, ischemic diseases, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, other heart diseases, influenza, pneumonia, asthma, respiratory insufficiency, and other respiratory diseases.

  19. This classification includes deaths due to infectious intestinal diseases, tuberculosis, meningococcal disease, viral hepatitis, AIDS and HIV, and other infectious diseases.

  20. This classification includes deaths due to meningitis, Alzheimer’s, stomach ulcer, enteritis, non-infectious colitis, and intestinal vascular diseases.

  21. This classification includes deaths due to a heart attack or other abnormal clinical and laboratory symptoms.

  22. This classification includes deaths due to other causes that have not been mentioned above.

  23. Tables 5 and 6 in the Appendix report the corresponding detailed regression results.

  24. Table 9 in the Appendix reports the corresponding detailed regression results.

  25. Table 7 in the Appendix reports the corresponding detailed regression results.

  26. We can also observe that the reform decreased mortality due to abnormal clinical and laboratory symptoms. However, this effect is minimal (one-fifth of the effect on external causes).

  27. Table 10 in the Appendix reports the corresponding detailed regression results.

  28. Table 8 in the Appendix reports the corresponding detailed regression results.

  29. Table 11 in the Appendix reports the corresponding detailed regression results.

  30. In particular, the reform increased deaths due to HIV or AIDS by 13.3% and other types of infections doubled. However, when we control for multiple hypothesis testing, the effect on HIV or AIDS is no longer statistically significant.

  31. The effect of the reform on influenza is no longer statistically significant when we control for multiple hypothesis testing.

  32. For more information on this database, please go to the Data Appendix that you can find in our working paper (https://www.crctr224.de/en/research-output/discussion-papers/archive/2020/unintended-health-costs-of-gender-equalization-cristina-belles-obrero-sergi-jimenez-martin-judit-vall-castello-current-versionhere).

  33. For more information on this database, please go to the Data Appendix that you can find in our working paper (https://www.crctr224.de/en/research-output/discussion-papers/archive/2020/unintended-health-costs-of-gender-equalization-cristina-belles-obrero-sergi-jimenez-martin-judit-vall-castello-current-versionhere).

References

  • Albouy V, Lequien L (2009) Does compulsory education lower mortality?. J Health Econ 28(1):155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amos A, Haglund M (2000) From social taboo to torch of freedom: the marketing of cigarettes to women. Tobacco Control 9(1):3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson ML (2008) Multiple inference and Gender differences in the effects of early intervention A reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects. J Amer Stat Assoc 103(484):1481–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellés-Obrero C, Cabrales A, Jimenez-Martin S, Vall-Castello J (2021) Women’s education, fertility and children’s health during a gender equalization process: Evidence from a child labor reform in spain. Technical Report, CEPR Discussion Papers

  • Benjamini Y, Krieger AM, Yekutieli D (2006) Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika 93(3):491–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilal U, Beltrán P, Fernández E, Navas-Acien A, Bolumar F, Franco M (2015) Gender equality and smoking: a theory-driven approach to smoking gender differences in Spain Tobacco control

  • Bird CE, Rieker PP (1999) Gender matters: an integrated model for understanding men’s and women’s health. Soc Sci Med 48(6):745–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borzecki A, Zółkowska D, Sieklucka-Dziuba M (2002) Life style and the risk of development of circulatory system diseases. In: “Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, Sectio D: Medicina, vol 57, pp 426–432

  • Bosdriesz JR, Mehmedovic S, Witvliet MI, Kunst AE (2014) Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking in low and mid income countries: positive gradients among women. Int J Equity Health 13:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound J, Jaeger DA (2000) Do compulsory school attendance laws alone explain the association between quarter of birth and earnings?. Res Labor Econ 19(4):83–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckles KS, Hungerman DM (2013) Season of birth and later outcomes: Old questions, new answers. Rev Econ Stat 95(3):711–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case A, Paxson C (2005) Sex differences in morbidity and mortality. Demography 42(2):189–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cipollone P, Rosolia A (2011) Schooling and youth mortality: learning from a mass military exemption. The World Bank

  • Clark D, Royer H (2013) The effect of education on adult mortality and health: Evidence from Britain. Am Econ Rev 103(6):2087–2120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Olalla García P, Caylà JA, Brugal MT, Galdós H, Jansá JM, Clos R (1999) The evolution of AIDS mortality and survival in Barcelona (1981-1997). Med Clin 113(5):169–170

  • Edmonds EV, Shrestha M (2012) The impact of minimum age of employment regulation on child labor and schooling: Evidence from UNICEF MICS countries. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research

  • for Disease Control Centers, Prevention et al (2010) How tobacco smoke causes disease: The biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease: A report of the surgeon general

  • Gathmann C, Jürges H, Reinhold S (2015) Compulsory schooling reforms, education and mortality in twentieth century Europe. Soc Sci Med 127:74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gine J M (1992) Traffic accident mortality in Catalonia and other autonomous communities (1983-1990). Gaceta Sanitaria 6(31):164–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin C, Katz LF (2011) Mass Secondary Schooling and the State: The role of state compulsion in the high school movement, understanding Long-Run economic growth: Geography, Institutions, and the Knowledge Economy, pp 275

  • Gómez-Redondo R, Boe C (2005) Decomposition analysis of Spanish life expectancy at birth: evolution and changes in the components by sex and age. Demogr Res 13:521–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grytten J, Skau I, Sørensen R (2020) Who dies early? Education, mortality and causes of death in Norway. Soc Sci Med 245:112601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung S (2015) Does education affect risk aversion? Evidence from the British education reform. Appl Econ 47(28):2924–2938

  • Kassouf AL, McKee M, Mossialos E (2001) Early entrance to the job market and its effect on adult health: evidence from Brazil. Health Policy Plann 16(1):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemptner D, Jürges H, Reinhold S (2011) Changes in compulsory schooling and the causal effect of education on health: Evidence from Germany. J Health Econ 30(2):340–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kippersluis HV, O’Donnell Ox, Doorslaer EV (2011) Long-run returns to education does schooling lead to an extended old age?. J Hum Resour 46(4):695–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Lager ACJ, Torssander J (2012) Causal effect of education on mortality in a quasi-experiment on 1.2 million Swedes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109 (22):8461–8466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lleras-Muney A (2002) Were compulsory attendance and child labor laws effective? an analysis from 1915 to 1939. J Law Econ 45:401–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lleras-Muney A (2005) The relationship between education and adult mortality in the United States. Rev Econ Stud 72(1):189–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loef M, Walach H (2012) The combined effects of healthy lifestyle behaviors on all cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prevent Med 55(3):163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez AD, Collishaw NE, Piha T (1994) A descriptive model of the cigarette epidemic in developed countries. Tobacco Control 3(3):242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luy M, Wegner-Siegmundt C (2014) The impact of smoking on gender differences in life expectancy: more heterogeneous than often stated. Eur J Publ Health 25(4):706–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay J, Amos A (2003) Women and tobacco. Respirology 8(2):123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meghir C, Palme M, Simeonova E (2018) Education and mortality: Evidence from a social experiment. Amer Econ J Appl Econ 10(2):234–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell O, Rosati Furio C, Van Doorslaer E (2005) Evidence from rural Vietnam: Health effects of child work. J Popul Econ 18(3):437–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksuzyan A, Juel K, Vaupel JW, Christensen K (2008) Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging. Aging Clin Exper Res 20(2):91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreopoulos P (2006) Estimating average and local average treatment effects of education when compulsory schooling laws really matter. Am Econ Rev 96(1):152–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palme M, Simeonova E (2015) Does women’s education affect breast cancer risk and survival? Evidence from a population based social experiment in education. J Health Econ 42:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pampel F (2005) Forecasting sex differences in mortality in high income nations: The contribution of smoking. Demograph Res 13(18):455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pampel FC (2002) Cigarette use and the narrowing sex differential in mortality. Popul Dev Rev 28(1):77–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pampel FC (2003) Age and education patterns of smoking among women in high-income nations. Soc Sci Med 57(8):1505–1514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker D (1997) Health effects of child labour. Lancet (Lond Engl) 350(9088):1395–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philips K (2010) Women’s labor force participation in Spain; An analysis from dictatorship to democracy

  • Preston SH, Wang H (2006) Sex mortality differences in the United States: The role of cohort smoking patterns. Demography 43(4):631–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puig X, Gispert R, Puigdefàbregas A (1983) Mortalitat per accidents de trànsit. Catalunya 1998:73–6

  • Rey ED, Jimenez-Martin S, Vall-Castello J (2018) Improving educational and labor outcomes through child labor regulation. Economics of Education Review

  • Ribes J, Clèries R, Borràs J, Galceran J, Bosch FX (2004) Time trends in incidence and mortality for chronic liver disease and liver cancer in the interval 1980–1997 in Catalonia, Spain. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 16 (9):865–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiz-Sánchez C, Bautista-Rentero D, Corella-Piquer D, Cortina-Birlanga S, González-Arraez JI (1999) Age-period-cohort analysis of traffic accident mortality in Spain. Salud Publ Mexico 41(3):170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schünemann J, Strulik H, Trimborn T (2018) The gender gap in mortality: How much is explained by behavior?. J Health Econ 54:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra I, Gispert R, Puig X, Torné MM, Puigdefàbregas A (2006) Impacte de l’edat I les causes de mort en els canvis de l’esperanċa de vida: catalunya, 1987-2002. Impacte de l’edat I les causes de mort en els canvis de l’esperanċ,a de vida: Catalunya, pp 1987–2002

  • Sindelar JL (1982) Differential use of medical care by sex. J Polit Econ 90(5):1003–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg L, Agahi N, Fritzell J, Fors S (2018) Why is the gender gap in life expectancy decreasing? The impact of age-and cause-specific mortality in Sweden 1997–2014. Int J Public Health 63(6):673–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thun M, Peto R, Boreham J, Lopez AD (2012) Stages of the cigarette epidemic on entering its second century. Tobacco Control 21(2):96–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle J, Haase AM, Steptoe A, Nillapun M, Jonwutiwes K, Bellisie F (2004) Gender differences in food choice: the contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Ann Behav Med 27(2):107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wensink M, Alvarez J-A, Rizzi S, Janssen F, Lindahl-Jacobsen R (2020) Progression of the smoking epidemic in high-income regions and its effects on male-female survival differences: a cohort-by-age analysis of 17 countries. BMC Publ Health 20(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank editor Shuaizhang Feng and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. Previously circulated as “The Effects of a Child Labor Law on Mortality,” “Education and Gender Differences in Mortality Rates,” and “Unintended Health Costs of Gender Equalization”.

Funding

Jiménez-Martín received financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, through the Severo Ochoa Programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D (SEV-2015-0563), and Bellés-Obrero from the German Research Foundation (DFG) through CRC TR 224 (Project A02), and the project ECO2017-82350-R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Bellés-Obrero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Shuaizhang Feng

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Effect of the reform on the mortality rate by cause of death among men aged 14 to 29
Table 6 Effect of the reform on the mortality rate by cause of death among men aged 30 to 45
Table 7 Effect of the reform on the mortality rate by cause of death among women aged 14 to 29
Table 8 Effect of the reform on the mortality rate by cause of death among women aged 30 to 45
Table 9 Effect of the reform on the mortality rate among men aged 14–29 due to external causes
Table 10 Effect of the reform on the mortality rate among women aged 14–29 due to external causes
Table 11 Effect of the reform on the mortality rate among women aged 30–45 due to infectious and parasitic diseases or circulatory and respiratory system diseases
Fig. 10
figure 10

Gender-specific mortality rates by cohort. The dots and triangles represent the average mortality rate of men/women in each cohort, 1961–1971, due to that specific cause of death. The lines are the linear predictions from Regression 1. Source: Mortality Registries (1975–2018), all men and women from cohorts 1961–1965 and 1967–1971

Table 12 Effect of the reform on men’s risky behaviors
Fig. 11
figure 11

Robustness: Gender-specific mortality rates with different age brackets. This figure shows the impact of the reform on the mortality rate of a men aged 14 to the age indicated in the x-axis, b men between the age indicated in the x-axis and 45 years old, c women aged 14 to the age indicated in the x-axis, and d women between the age indicated in the x-axis and 45 years old. The graphs report the point estimates and the 95% confidence interval of the interaction term (Treated* Post Reform) from Regression 1. The dependent variables are the mortality rate (number of men/women that died divided by the total number of men/women born in each cohort and treatment) of men or women in the age bracket that is indicated. All dependent variables are multiplied by 1000. Source: Mortality Registries (1975–2018), all men and women from cohorts 1961–1965 and 1967–1971

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bellés-Obrero, C., Jiménez-Martín, S. & Castello, J.V. Minimum working age and the gender mortality gap. J Popul Econ 35, 1897–1938 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-021-00858-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-021-00858-x

Keywords

  • Minimum working age
  • Education
  • Mortality
  • Gender equalization

JEL Classification

  • I12
  • I20
  • J10