Skip to main content

Government Transfers, Work, and Wellbeing: Evidence from the Russian Old-Age Pension

Abstract

This paper examines the impacts of a large and anticipated government transfer, the Russian old-age pension, on labor supply, home production, and subjective wellbeing. The discontinuity in eligibility at pension age is exploited for inference. The 2006–2011 Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey is employed. At pension age, women reduce market work and appear to increase home production. They report increased wellbeing. Men reduce labor supply without any apparent increase in wellbeing. Pension receipt does not impact household composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  • Abadie A, Imbens GW (2006) Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74:235–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abeler J, Marklein F (2008) Fungibility, labels, and consumption. Discussion Paper 3500, IZA

  • Alesina A, Giuliano P, Nunn N (2013) On the origins of gender roles: women and the plough. Q J Econ 128(2):469–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J Public Econ 95(9):1082–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson BA (1986) Work among Soviets of retirement age. Working paper of the Soviet Interview Project, University of Illinois

  • Bonsang E, Klein TJ (2012) Retirement and subjective well-being. J Econ Behav Organ 83(3):311–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinch CN, Vestad OL, Zweimüller J (2015) Excess early retirement? Evidence from the Norwegian 2011 pension reform. Mimeo

  • Bussolo M, Schotte S, Matytsin M (2015) Population aging and households’ saving in the Russian Federation. Policy Research Working Paper 7443, The World Bank

  • Calonico S, Cattaneo M, Farrell MH, Titiunik R (2018) Regression discontinuity designs using covariates. Review of Economics and Statistics. forthcoming

  • Calonico S, Cattaneo M, Titiunik R (2014) Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica 82(6):2295–2326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campa P, Serafinelli M (2016) Politico-economic regimes and attitudes: female workers under state-socialism Working Paper 089, Centre for Research on Social Dynamics, Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi

  • Cappelen AW, Moene KO, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2013) Needs versus entitlements − an international fairness experiment. J Eur Econ Assoc 11(3):574–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case A, Deaton A (1998) Large cash transfers to the elderly in South Africa. Econ J 108(450):1330–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case A, Deaton A (2015) Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(49):15078–15083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo MD, Jansson M, Ma X (2017) Simple local polynomial density estimators. Working paper, University of Michigan

  • Cigno A, Casolaro L, Rosati FC (2003) The impact of social security on saving and fertility in Germany. FinanzArchiv 59(2):189–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigno A, Komura M, Luporini A (2017) Self-enforcing family rules, marriage and the (non)neutrality of public intervention. J Popul Econ 30:805–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigno A, Rosati FC (1996) Jointly determined saving and fertility behaviour: theory, and estimates from Germany, Italy, UK, and USA. Eur Econ Rev 40:1561–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A (2003) Unemployment as a social norm: psychological evidence from panel data. J Labour Econ 21(2):323–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Bó E, Tervió M (2013) Self-esteem, moral capital, and wrongdoing. J Eur Econ Assoc 11(3):599–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danzer AM (2013) Benefit generosity and the income effect on labour supply: quasi-experimental evidence. Econ J 123:1059–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DellaVigna S, List J, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Q J Econ 127(1):1–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella R, Macculloch R (2006) Some uses of happiness data in economics. J Econ Perspect 20(1):25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y (2018) Alternative assumptions to identify LATE in fuzzy regression discontinuity designs. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Forthcoming

  • Duflo E (2003) Grandmothers and granddaughters: old-age pensions and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa. World Bank Econ Rev 17(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2018) Back to work: Russia will raise pension ages that date back to Stalin. The Economist 427(9098)

  • Edmonds EV (2004) Does illiquidity alter child labor and schooling decisions? Evidence from household responses to anticipated cash transfers in South Africa. Working Paper 10265, National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Edmonds EV, Mammen K, Miller DL (2005) Rearranging the family? Income support and elderly living arrangements in a low-income country. J Hum Resour 40(1):186–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eich F, Soto M, Gust C (2012) Reforming the public pension system in the Russian Federation. Technical Report 12/201, International Monetary Fund

  • Ekerdt DJ (1986) The busy ethic: moral continuity between work and retirement. Gerontologist 26:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellner G, Sausgruber R, Traxler C (2013) Testing enforcement strategies in the field: threat, moral appeal and social information. J Eur Econ Assoc 11(3):634–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro PJ, Price MK (2013) Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Rev Econ Stat 95(1):64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman C, Gneezy U, List JA (2012) Equity aversion: social norms and the desire to be ahead. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4(4):131–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbacher U, Föllmi-Heusi F (2013) Lies in disguise − an experimental study on cheating. J Eur Econ Assoc 11(3):525–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gächter S, Nosenzo D, Sefton M (2013) Peer effects in pro-social behavior: social norms or social preferences? J Eur Econ Assoc 11(3):548–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano P, Spilimbergo A (2014) Growing up in a recession. Rev Econ Stud 81:787–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneezy U, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2016) Ode to the sea: workplace organizations and norms of cooperation. Econ J 125(595):1856–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman SD (2003) Russian developments. In: Columbus FH (ed) Russia in transition, vol 1. Nova Publishers

  • Gronau R (1977) Leisure, home production, and work: the theory of the allocation of time revisited. J Polit Econ 85(6):1099–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn J, Todd P, Van der Klaauw W (2001) Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica 69(1):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hener T (2013) Labeling effects of child benefits on family savings. Working Paper 163, Ifo Institute

  • Hetschko C, Knabe A, Schöb R (2014) Changing identity: retiring from unemployment. Econ J 124(575):149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höjestrand T (2009) Needed by nobody: homelessness and humanness in Post- socialist Russia. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Mortality Database (2015) http://www.mortality.org. University of California, Berkeley, and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research

  • Imbens G, Kalyanaraman K (2012) Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Rev Econ Stud 79(3):933–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens GW, Lemieux T (2008) Regression discontinuity designs: a guide to practice. J Econ 142:615–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen RT, Richter K (2003) The health implications of social security failure: evidence from the Russian pension crisis. J Public Econ 88:209–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TA, Moskoff W (1987) Pensioners in the Soviet labour force: the limits of monetary inducements. Sov Stud 39(1):88–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman DPW, Sarin R (1998) Back to Bentham? explorations of experienced utility. Q J Econ 2(112):375–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane M, Moffitt R (1998) A structural model of multiple welfare program participation and labor supply. Int Econ Rev 39(3):553–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesavayuth D, Rosenman RE, Zikos V (2016) Retirement, personality, and well-being. Econ Inq 54(2):733–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim BY (2003) Informal economy activities of Soviet households: size and dynamics. J Comp Econ 31(3):523–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivumaa-Honkanen H, Honkanen R, Viinamäki H, Heikkilä K, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M (2000) Self-reported life satisfaction and 20-year mortality in healthy Finnish adults. Am J Epidemiol 152(10):983–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooreman P (2000) The labeling effect of a child benefit system. Am Econ Rev 90(3):571–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupka EL, Weber RA (2009) The focusing and informational effects of norms on pro-social behavior. J Econ Psychol 30:307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupka EL, Weber RA (2013) Identifying social norms using coordination games: why does dictator game sharing vary? J Eur Econ Assoc 11(3):495–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DS, Lemieux T (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. J Econ Lit 48:281–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt R (1983) An economic model of welfare stigma. Am Econ Rev 73(5):1023–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruckner GJ, Sausgruber R (2013) Honesty on the streets: a field study on newspaper purchasing. J Eur Econ Assoc 11(3):661–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin M (1998) Psychology and economics. J Econ Lit 36(1):1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney CK, Kushman JE (1987) Cash equivalence, welfare stigma and food stamps. South Econ J 53(47):1011–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid M, Thompson L, Von Gersdorff H, Zotova E (2002) Pension reform in Russia: design and implementation. Technical Report 29017, The World Bank

  • Rege M, Telle K, Votruba M (2012) Social interaction effects in disability pension participation: evidence from plant downsizing. Scand J Econ 114(4):1208–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RLMS-HSE (2012) Russia longitudinal monitoring survey. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/rlms-hse. The Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Higher School of Economics, Moscow

  • Rosstat (2015) Table 7.1: Main socio-economic indicators of living standards of population http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/en/main/. Federal State Statsticial Service, Moscow

  • Szinovacz ME, DeViney S (1999) The retiree identity: gender and race differences. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 54B(4):S207–S218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utrata J (2011) Youth privilege: doing age and gender in Russia’s single-mother families. Gend Soc 25(5):616–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK, Huber J, Bell J (2011) Promoting recycling: private values, social norms, and economic incentives. Am Econ Rev 101(3):65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WVS (2015) World value survey 1981-2014 longitudinal aggregate v.20150418 Aggregate File Producer: JDSystems Data Archive, Madrid, Spain. World Values Survey Association (www.worldvaluessurvey.org)

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the Editor and two anonymous referees for very helpful suggestions. The authors are also grateful for comments from Mike Hoy, Xin Jin, Erzo Luttmer, Paul Oyer, Miana Plesca, John Skåtun, Casey Warman and participants of the 2015 Canadian Economics Association and Southern Economics Association annual meetings. We also thank seminar participants at Acadia University, Dalhousie University, the University of Aberdeen, University of Guelph, Lakehead University, University of Vermont, ZEW Mannheim and the Bank of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fraser Summerfield.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Alessandro Cigno

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Russian old-age state pensions

The Russian pension system retained much of the structure of the Soviet pension system through the 1990s and early 2000s. Pension eligibility is based on age thresholds that were first introduced under Khrushchev’s leadership in 1956. As in the Soviet Union, old-age state pensions require only five years of work experience. The pensions had two main components including a fixed amount that is supplemented by a labor pension amount. The labor amount can vary with individual contributions based on wages, but the rate of return is prescribed by law. Base amounts were set at 55 percent of income in the preceding 2 years, plus 1 percent for every year of service beyond 25 years. Many supplements were available. For example, an additional 25 percent of the minimum pension amount was available for those with health problems. An additional two-thirds of the minimum pension amount was paid for each dependent in the household and to war veterans.

Working past retirement age was common in the Soviet Union. Pensions were reformed in 1970 to encourage this. By the early 1980s one-third of eligible pensioners continued to work. Almost all workers who delayed retirement received full pensions in addition to their income (Jones and Moskoff 1987). Except for about 10 percent of workers in white-collar occupations, everyone was able to receive pension and labor income amounts together. Even the small fraction of the civil service who are subject to age limitations in the workplace, such as public university rectors and ministers, have the option of postponing retirement for up to five years. Because pension amounts were based on past records of earnings and not indexed to inflation, replacement values remained low through the 1990s. Pension replacement rates fell from 75 percent prior to 1990 to below 30 percent by 2005 (Rashid et al. 2002; Rosstat 2015). In addition, many state-provided essentials including heat and transportation subsidies were removed. The ability of pension income to meet the needs of Russians was generally lower in the post-Soviet era than it had been just prior to the collapse.

Appendix 2: Supplementary tables and figures

Table 7 The causal impact of attaining state pension age on other subjective wellbeing outcomes. RD estimates, Russia 2006–2011
Table 8 Test for discontinuity in density of age at pension threshold
Fig. 9
figure 9

Household savings percentiles by sex, Russia 2006–2011. Source: RLMS-HSE 2006–2011. Monthly real household savings in 2000 Roubles. Solid line shows percentiles before pension age, dashed line after pension age. Pension ages are 55 for women and 60 for men

Appendix 3: Results by education and health

Estimates for sub-samples of men and women by reported health and education offer insight about the heterogeneity of effects by human capital. We split the samples according to respondent reports in 2006.

Results are estimated separately for individuals who did and did not report having a serious health problem in the 30 days prior to survey response. Table 9 presents fuzzy RD results for our preferred specification. Means of outcome variables are reported at the bottom of each panel. These means are reported separately for the periods before and after pension age, each of which span 5 years. The impact of pension receipt on the labor supply decisions of women with health problems in Panel A and without health problems in Panel B is very similar. Monthly hours worked are reduced by 26 and 21, respectively. The measured effect of pension receipt on whether or not a woman is working outside the home is negative for both groups, although it is significant only for women without health concerns.

Table 9 Main results, separately by health status in 2006

The impacts for male retirement behavior in Panels C and D are more distinct. Men reporting no health problems exhibit retirement behavior at pension age. Pension receipt decreases the likelihood of working outside the home and amounts to a reduction of 62 hours worked per month. In contrast, results are statistically insignificant among those reporting a health concern. This is true despite the fact that the impact of pension receipt on the incomes of these men with health concerns is more than twice as large as the effect on those without any health concern. Means of the outcome variables show that the men with and without health concerns work an average of 86 and 107 hours per month, respectively.

Results are also estimated separately for individuals who did and did not complete higher education. We code individuals who reported obtaining a diploma from an institute; university; post-graduate residency or individuals holding a masters degree; diploma of candidate of science or doctor of science, as having completed higher education and others as having completed less than higher education. Results in Table 10 show that only those having completed higher education exhibit significant decreases in monthly hours worked. Increases in total monthly income and life satisfaction are slightly more significant for less-educated women. These results suggest that highly educated workers are most likely to have the financial resources to retire at pension age. Those with less education must continue working. Sub-sample means show that average monthly income for less educated women is about 5,000 roubles less than for women with high education.

Table 10 Main results, separately by Education Level in 2006

For men, impacts on the probability of working outside the home are negative for both those who have and those who have not completed higher education. The impact of pension receipt on home production for cash is large and significant among those households where men have less education. Sub-sample means suggest that the larger impact for these men arises because home production output for cash was much larger in these households prior to pension age. We cannot reject a null hypothesis of no impact on life satisfaction for either sub-sample of males.

Appendix 4: Social norms

Differences in social norms arising from the historical context in Russia provide one explanation for the observed changes in home production. Age-and sex-specific norms about workers and recipients of old-age pension may help to explain wellbeing impacts if they strongly influence the perceived returns to engaging in different activities. Pension income may be expected to bring about changes in the self-perceptions and time use of older workers if pension receipt is accompanied by a retirement identity that may reflect a shift in the social norms to which an individual feels they must conform. This phenomenon has been described across social science disciplines (Clark 2003; Ekerdt 1986; Szinovacz and DeViney 1999).

The economics literature contains mixed evidence about the importance of non-monetary factors in governing behavioral responses to social transfers. Keane and Moffitt (1998), Moffitt (1983), and Ranney and Kushman (1987) suggest that welfare or food stamps might induce stigma among recipients. In the labeling effects literature, Kooreman (2000), Abeler and Marklein (2008), and Hener (2013) show that certain income sources are more likely to be spent on particular items for the household, perhaps as the result of an implicit social contract. However, Case and Deaton (1998) find no differential use of South African pensions on household expenditures relative to earned income. Impacts attributed to labelling or other non-monetary aspects of social transfers may in fact be the result of failure to control for individual-specific fixed effects or the use of IV estimates in the cross-section where exclusion restrictions are more likely violated. There is extensive evidence of social norms from the environmental economics and experimental economics literatures, including Allcott (2011), Campa and Serafinelli (2016), Cappelen et al. (2013), Dal Bó and Tervió (2013), DellaVigna et al. (2012), Fellner et al. (2013), Ferraro and Price (2013), Fershtman et al. (2012), Fischbacher and Föllmi-Heusi (2013), Gächter et al. (2013), Gneezy et al. (2016), Krupka and Weber (2009), Krupka and Weber (2013), Pruckner and Sausgruber (2013), and Viscusi et al. (2011). Social interaction effects, themselves possible manifestations of social norms have also been shown to affect participation in various programs including disability insurance in Norway (Rege et al. 2012).

Economists and psychologists have found that preferences formed during recessionary periods experienced between the ages of 18 and 25 remain remarkably stable later in life (Giuliano and Spilimbergo 2014). This suggests that social norms may be set during the sensitive ages of youth and persist through retirement age. Individuals in our sample would have formed these norms during the Soviet period.

Alesina et al. (2013) show that gender norms formed by ancestors significantly impact contemporary female labor force participation. Cigno et al. (2017) also provide complementary theoretical results which supports the transmission of preferences from parents to children. Gender norms formed during the Soviet period may also persist across generations. Lasting impressions of mothers and grandmothers may have suggested a woman’s role was to retire to the home at pension age and engage in home production (Höjestrand 2009). The observed male role, instead, was centered around the continued importance of work beyond pension age. Men generally did not retire and historically participated little in child-rearing (Utrata 2011). Thus, for older Russian men, the typical assumption that leisure is a normal good may not hold.

The moderating effects of social norms on reactions to receiving old-age pensions are likely to be particularly strong for individuals whose impressionable years were spent in the Soviet Union. Social norms can be examined using The World Values Survey (WVS 2015), a nationally-representative questionnaire designed to assess beliefs and values. Cross-sections are available for Russia for the years 1990, 1995, 2006, and 2011 and include subjective responses to questions regarding about acceptable ages for workers. Details of the questions posed are given in Appendix 5.

WVS data show that social norms about work have changed substantially across generations during the period 1990–2011. Older generations are more likely to hold norms that favor the continued employment of males beyond pension age. Meanwhile, attitudes towards work among older workers remain similar to those promoted by the state during Soviet times. Table 11 presents ordered probit estimates using existing waves of the WVS. Compared to the 1990 survey, in the 2011 survey both sexes were more likely to report agreement with the statement “When jobs are scarce, men should have more right to a job than women”. The idea that women should cede jobs to men in difficult economic times grew more acceptable over time. WVS responses indicating agreement with the statement “When jobs are scarce older people should be forced to retire” also change across generations. In 1995, the last year for which the question was posed, both sexes were significantly more likely to agree with this statement than in 1990. Agreement with these statements differs slightly between the sexes but the trend in beliefs was the same for women and men, ceteris paribus.

Table 11 Social norms about work and leisure in Russia, 1990-2011

To further demonstrate differences in social norms across cohorts, Table 12 presents the impact of reaching pension age on the subjective importance of work. Negative estimates for women suggest that they were relatively happy to retire and contribute to the family upon reaching pension age. This finding offers one explanation for increases in life satisfaction that are large relative to the mean response among women. This effect is most evident among less-educated women.

Table 12 The effect of pension age attainment on the perceived importance of work, separately by gender. Russia 1990-2011

There is no evidence that the importance of work for men decreases at pension age. The lack of change in views of men at retirement age about the importance of work to life contrasts with the observed broad changes in general views of work in Russian society. The sustained importance of work for men beyond retirement age may be partly due to persistent social norms venerating work among there older cohorts. This finding offers one explanation for increases in life satisfaction that are very small relative to the mean response among men. Additional results in Table 13 confirm that these social norms in Russia differ substantially from those held in the US.

Table 13 Comparison of views about older people in Russia and the US, World Values Surveys 1995 and 2011

Appendix 5: World Values Survey (WVS) Questionnaire

For interviews carried out in wave 3 (Russia 1995 and USA 1997), respondents were asked the following questions related to age and retirement:

  • Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When jobs are scarce, older people should be forced to retire from work early.

    Respondents could choose one of the following responses: Agree (1), Neither (2), Disagree (3).

  • Please tell me how acceptable or unacceptable you think most people in [country] would find it if a suitably qualified 30 year old was appointed as their boss?

    Respondents could choose responses on a scale from Completely unacceptable (1), to Completely acceptable (10).

  • Please tell me how acceptable or unacceptable you think most people in [country] would find it if a suitably qualified 70 year old was appointed as their boss?

    Respondents could choose responses on a scale from Completely unacceptable (1), to Completely acceptable (10).

  • Now could you tell me whether you agree, agree strongly, disagree or disagree strongly with each of the following statements: Companies that employ young people perform better than those that employ people of different ages.

    Respondents could choose between the following responses: Strongly agree (1), Agree(2), Disagree (3), Strongly disagree (4).

Appendix 6: Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS) Questionnaire

The subjective wellbeing questions included in the RLMS 2006–2011 are:

  • (i.) “To what extent are you satisfied with your life at the present time?

    Respondents could choose one of the following responses [recoded in this paper to be increasing in satisfaction]: Fully satisfied (5), Rather satisfied (4), Both yes and no (3), Less than satisfied (2), or Not at all satisfied (1).

  • (ii.) “And now, imagine please a nine-step ladder, where on the bottom, the first step, stand the poorest people, and on the highest step, the ninth, stand the richest people. On what step are you?

    Respondents chose a number in the range 1-9, inclusive.

  • (iii.) “And now, imagine please a nine-step ladder, where on the bottom, the first step, stand the powerless people, and on the highest step, the ninth, stand the most powerful people. On what step are you?

    Respondents chose a number in the range 1-9, inclusive.

  • (iv.)“And now, another nine-step ladder where on the lowest step stand people who are absolutely not respected, and on the highest step stand those who are very respected. On which of the nine steps are you personally standing today?

    Respondents chose a number in the range 1-9, inclusive.

  • (v.) “Do you think that 12 months from now your family will live better than today, or worse?

    Respondents chose from responses: Will live much better (1), Will live somewhat better (2), Nothing will change (3), Will live somewhat worse (4), Will live much worse (5).

  • (vi.)“To what extent are you concerned about your family’s ability to procure basic necessities in the next twelve months?

    Respondents chose from responses: Very concerned (1), A little concerned (2), Not very concerned (3), Not concerned at all (4).

  • (vii.) “Tell me, please, how would you evaluate your health?

    Respondents chose from responses: Very good (1), Good (2), Average (3), Bad (4) or Very bad (5).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grogan, L., Summerfield, F. Government Transfers, Work, and Wellbeing: Evidence from the Russian Old-Age Pension. J Popul Econ 32, 1247–1292 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-018-0726-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-018-0726-8

Keywords

  • Labor supply
  • Pensions
  • Subjective wellbeing
  • Fuzzy regression discontinuity

JEL Classification

  • I31
  • J22
  • J26
  • Z13