Ancestral ecological endowments and missing women

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between ecological endowments in antiquity and contemporary female to male sex ratios in the population. It is found that there are proportionately more missing women in countries whose ancestral ecological endowments were poorer. This relationship is shown to be strong even after ancestral plough use, the timing of the Neolithic Transition, and many other potentially confounding factors are controlled for. Similar results are also obtained using district-level data from India.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    Relatedly, Grogan (2018) finds that a preference for sons is more pronounced among ethnicities likelier to employ the plough.

  2. 2.

    Engels (1902) too made just such an argument.

  3. 3.

    By these authors, hunter–gatherers suffering resource stress are under pressure to control their numbers, and fertility control is facilitated by the subjugation of women of child-bearing age. This conclusion is borne out in the authors’ observation that strictures upon women are significantly loosened upon their reaching menopause.

  4. 4.

    Since infant mortality is higher in boys than girls, perhaps an adverse environment led to selection, whereby surviving male infants were more robust than average, growing up to be taller than average, and this, not human intervention, led to a widening of the average height difference between the genders. However, since male growth processes are more sensitive to environmental conditions, selection from the greater mortality of boys under adverse conditions may not in itself have led to rise in average adult male height if these conditions persisted to adulthood.

  5. 5.

    Given our hypothesis that ancestral resource scarcity led to cultural norms of gender inequality in command of resources, the female to male sex ratio in the population better suits our purpose than children’s sex-ratios because skewedness in the former has been a consequence primarily of lifetime deprivation, whereas recent skewedness in the latter, at least in the Asian nations in which it is most pronounced, is driven by sex-selective abortion. Further, Andersen and Ray (2010) note that even in China, a significant proportion of missing females are adults, and that adults constitute the majority of missing females in India.

  6. 6.

    Conversion from crop to caloric yield utilizes the US Department of Agriculture’s Nutrient Database for Standard Reference.

  7. 7.

    The element (i,j) of this matrix is the fraction of country i’s population in the year 2000 whose ancestors were living in country j in 1500.

  8. 8.

    Fredriksson and Gupta (2018) too find that sex ratios are more skewed against females in countries with longer histories of agriculture.

  9. 9.

    Note, however, that the advent of sophisticated political organization, conducive to the founding of beneficial institutions, may have had little to do with agricultural productivity (Mayshar et al. 2017).

  10. 10.

    Anderson (2011) observes that, by the 1991 and 2001 censuses, 24 to 29% of the population of India consists of migrants, with 60% of these moving within the same district and 25% moving within the same state.

  11. 11.

    Obtainable from Soils of India published by the National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Indian Council of Agricultural Research

  12. 12.

    One of these is (East) Punjab, called the ‘wheat bowl of India’, but its high agricultural productivity is driven by modern irrigation given its annual rainfall of but 649 mm.

  13. 13.

    For instance, there is evidence that damage to ecological resources in Europe, the Near East and North Africa, owing to a phenomenon of climatic cooling during the period 1450–1850 led to rise in conflict (Iyigun et al. 2017).

  14. 14.

    Cigno et al. (2017) describe a societal or family norm as prescribed behaviour whose amendment is not in the interest of future generations. It is unclear that norms of gender inequality fit this description. For example, while it may have been optimal for women in antiquity to specialize in household work in societies employing the plough, it cannot be said that this specialization remains advantageous.

  15. 15.

    Norms governing the inter-gender sharing of household resources might be reconciled with present-day intra-household bargaining if they were viewed as altering the genders’ respective utility functions in such a way that bargaining results in greater resource allocations to males. After all, there is evidence of women absorbing patriarchal ideologies to perpetuate gender inequality (Sultana 2010).

References

  1. Aizer A (2010) The gender wage gap and domestic violence. Am Econ Rev 100(4):1847–1859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alderman H, Gertler P (1997) Family resources and gender differences in human capital investments: the demand for children’s medical care in Pakistan. In: Haddad L, Hoddinott J, Alderman H (eds) Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: methods, models, and policy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alesina A, Giuliano P, Nunn N (2013) On the origins of gender roles: women and the plough. Q J Econ 128(2):469–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Andersen S, Ray D (2010) Missing women: age and disease. Rev Econ Stud 77(4):1262–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson S (2011) Caste as an impediment to trade. Am Econ J Appl Econ 3(1):239–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker A (2017) Herding and male dominance. Working Paper available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3069684, or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3069684

  7. Behrman JR (1988) Intrahousehold allocation of nutrients in rural India: are boys favoured? Do parents exhibit inequality aversion? Oxf Econ Pap 40(1):32–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bockstette V, Chanda A, Putterman L (2002) States and markets: the advantage of an early start. J Econ Growth 7(4):347–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boserup E (1970) Woman’s role in economic development. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carranza E (2014) Soil endowments, female labor force participation, and the demographic deficit of women in India. Am Econ J Appl Econ 6(4):197–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cigno A, Komura M, Luporini A (2017) Self-enforcing family rules, marriage and the (non)neutrality of public intervention. J Popul Econ 30(3):805–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen MN, Bennett S (1993) Skeletal evidence for sex roles and gender hierarchies in prehistory. In: Miller BD (ed) Sex and gender hierarchies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duflo E (2012) Women empowerment and economic development. J Econ Lit 50(4):1051–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Engels F (1902) The origin of the family, private property, and the state. Charles H. Kerr & Company Co-operative, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fredriksson PG, Gupta SK (2018) The Neolithic revolution and contemporary sex ratios. Econ Lett 173:19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gallup JL, Sachs JD, Mellinger AD (1999) Geography and economic development. Int Reg Sci Rev 22(2):179–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Galor O, Ozak O (2016) The agricultural origins of time preference. Am Econ Rev 106(10):3064–3103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Geary D (2015) Evolution of vulnerability: implications for sex differences in health and development. Academic/Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grogan L (2018) Labor market conditions and cultural change: evidence from Vietnam. J Hum Cap 12(1):99–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2016) Long-term persistence. J Eur Econ Assoc 14(6):1401–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen CW, Jensen PS, Skovsgaard C (2015) Modern gender roles and agricultural history: the Neolithic inheritance. J Econ Growth 20(4):365–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hayden B (1992) Observing prehistoric women. In: Claassen C (ed) Exploring gender through archaeology. Prehistory Press, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hayden B, Deal M, Cannon A, Casey J (1986) Ecological determinants of women’s status among hunter/gatherers. Hum Evol 1(5):449–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hofstede G (1991) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Iyigun M, Nunn N, Qian N (2017) Winter is coming: the long-run effects of climate change on conflict. NBER working paper 23033. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jayachandran S (2015) The roots of gender inequality in developing countries. Annu Rev Econ 7(1):63–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jones PD, Mann ME (2004) Climate over past millennia. Rev Geophys 42(2):1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Klasen S, Wink C (2003) “Missing women”: revisiting the debate. Fem Econ 9(2–3):263–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2008) The economic consequences of legal origins. J Econ Lit 46(2):285–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Manser M, Brown M (1980) Marriage and household decision-making: a bargaining analysis. Int Econ Rev 21(1):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mayshar J, Moav O, Neeman Z, Pascali L (2017) Cereals, appropriability, and hierarchy, The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series 1130, Department of Economics, University of Warwick

  32. McCleary RM, Barro RJ (2006) Religion and economy. J Econ Perspect 20(2):49–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Putterman L, Weil DN (2010) Post 1500 population flows and the long-run determinants of economic growth and inequality. Q J Econ 125(4):1627–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rose E (1999) Consumption smoothing and excess female mortality in rural India. Rev Econ Stat 81(1):41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sen AK (1990) More than 100 million women are missing. The New York Review of Books, 37(20):1–15

  36. Sultana AM (2010) Patriarchy and women’s gender ideology: a socio-cultural perspective. J Soc Sci 6(1):123–126

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wrangham RW (1986) Ecology and social relationships in two species of chimpanzee. In: Rubenstein DI, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecological aspects of social evolution in birds and mammals. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The very helpful comments of two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gautam Hazarika.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Alessandro Cigno

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hazarika, G., Jha, C.K. & Sarangi, S. Ancestral ecological endowments and missing women. J Popul Econ 32, 1101–1123 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-018-0723-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gender inequality
  • Historical factors
  • Resource scarcity
  • Culture

JEL codes

  • D1
  • J1
  • Z1