Skip to main content

National identity under economic integration

Abstract

This study empirically investigates how economic integration influences individuals’ national identity. Due to historical reasons and unique cross-strait politics, some people in Taiwan identify themselves as Chinese while others identify themselves as Taiwanese. Using individual survey data with the outward investment data at the industry level from 1992 to 2009, we find that the rising investment in China has strengthened Taiwanese identity and has reduced the probability of voting for the Pan-Blue parties. The effects are much stronger for unskilled workers than for skilled workers, suggesting that outward investment in China may not only have economic impact on the economy but may also deepen the political polarization in Taiwan.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. In recent studies, for example, Masella (2013) suggests that ethnic diversity does not necessarily weaken national identity. Georgiadis and Manning (2012) find that people who feel that they are treated with respect are more likely to identify with the wider society. Constant and Zimmermann (2013) provide comprehensive review and discussion of the formation and divergence/reconciliation of national and ethnic identities.

  2. Similar findings in Korea were presented by Debaere et al. (2010), who show that investing in a country less advanced than the home country has negative effects on employment.

  3. Esses et al. (2001) find that perceived group competition fosters a negative attitude toward immigrants. Chen and Li (2009) find that cooperation on task completion can induce group identity in experiments.

  4. For example, the article “China causes Taiwan brain drain” by the Financial Times on March 31, 2013, mentioned industrial “hollowing out,” the wage stagnation of factory workers, and the brain drain of educated workers.

  5. Depreciation rate was set at 10% in the studies of Kydland and Prescott (1982) and Greenwood et al. (1988). According to Albonico et al. (2014), most capital depreciation rates estimated in studies are between 8 to 13%. In our section of robustness checks, we add results based on depreciation rate equal to 8% and depreciation rate equal to 12%.

  6. Ideally, we would like to construct our variable as cumulated outward investment over domestic capital stock at industry level. However, we do not find capital stock data by industry to match with our 35 industry categories.

  7. Non-workers are mainly students, housewives, and retired people. Among non-workers, the proportion of middle-aged men is only around 5%. We estimated a model on non-workers with the “average” investment across all industries and other demographic variables. The effect of the average investment is not significant while the effects of other demographic variables are not far from the effects we find in Table 2.

References

  • Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart J Econ 115:715–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albonico A, Kalyvitis S, Pappa E (2014) Capital maintenance and depreciation over the business cycle. J Econ Dynam Control 39:273–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Spolaore E (1997) On the number and size of nations. Quart J Econ 112:1027–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Spolaore E, Wacziarg R (2000) Economic integration and political disintegration. Amer Econ Rev 90:1276–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisin A, Patacchini E, Verdier T, Zenou Y (2011) Formation and persistence of oppositional identities. Europ Econ Rev 55:1046–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhorn H, Ruebeck CS (2003) The economics of identity and the endogeneity of race. NBER Working Paper No.9962, National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Bolton P, Roland G (1997) The breakup of nations: a political economy analysis. Quart J Econ 112:1057–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MJ (2004) Is Taiwan Chinese?: the impact of culture, power, and migration on changing identities. Univ of California Press

  • Brückner M, Ciccone A (2010) International commodity prices, growth and the outbreak of civil war in sub-Saharan Africa. Econ J 120:519–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TJ, Ku YH (2005) The effect of overseas investment on domestic employment. In International Trade in East Asia, NBER-East Asia Seminar on Econ, vol 14, 109–132. Univ of Chicago Press

  • Chen Y, Li SX (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer Economic Rev 99:431–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WL, Lin MJ, Yang TT (2016) Curriculum and national identity: evidence from the 1997 Textbook Reform in Taiwan. In: 11th Cross-Strait Workshop (Beijing, China: China)

  • Constant AF, Zimmermann KF (2013) Immigrants, ethnic identities and the nation-state. In: Constant AF, Zimmermann KF (ed) International handbook on the econ of migration, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, USA. pp 259–275

  • Debaere P, Lee H, Lee J (2010) It matters where you go: outward foreign direct investment and multinational employment growth at home. J Devel Econ 91:301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esses VM, Dovidio JF, Jackson LM, Armstrong TL (2001) The immigration dilemma: the role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. J Soc Issues 57:389–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiadis A, Manning A (2013) One nation under a groove? Understanding national identity. J Econ Behav Org 93:166–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood J, Hercowitz Z, Huffman GW (1988) Investment, capacity utilization, and the real business cycle. Amer Econ Rev:402–417

  • Harrison M (2016) Legitimacy, meaning and knowledge in the making of Taiwanese identity. Springer

  • Hauge W, Ellingsen T (1998) Beyond environmental scarcity: causal pathways to conflict. J Peace Res 35:299–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog A, Tucker JA (2010) The dynamics of support: the winners–losers gap in attitudes toward EU membership in post-communist countries. Eur Pol Sci Rev 2:235–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang LL, Liu JH, Chang M (2004) The double identity’of Taiwanese Chinese: a dilemma of politics and culture rooted in history. Asian J Soc Psych 7:149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kydland FE, Prescott EC (1982) Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometric: J the Econometric Soc 50:1345–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu WH, Tsai PL, Tsay CL (2015) Domestic impacts of outward FDI in Taiwan: evidence from panel data of manufacturing firms. Int Rev Econ Finance 39:469–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning A, Roy S (2009) Culture clash or culture club? National identity in Britain. Econ J 120(542):F72–F100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margalit Y (2011) Costly jobs: trade-related layoffs, government compensation, and voting in US elections. Amer Polit Sci Rev 105:166–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masella P (2013) National identity and ethnic diversity. J Population Econ 26:437–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel E, Satyanath S, Sergenti E (2004) Economic shocks and civil conflict: an instrumental variables approach. J Polit Economy 112:725–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muyard F (2012) Taiwanese national identity, cross-strait economic interaction, and the integration paradigm. In: National identity and economic interest. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 153–186

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shen SC, Wu N (2008) Ethnic and civic nationalisms: two roads to the formation of a Taiwanese nation. In: Chow PCY (ed) The “One China” dilemma. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp117–143

  • Tsou MW, Liu JT, Hammitt JK, Chang CF (2013) The impact of foreign direct investment in China on employment adjustments in Taiwan: evidence from matched employer–employee data. Japan World Econ 25:68–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker JA, Pacek AC, Berinsky AJ (2002) Transitional winners and losers: attitudes toward EU membership in post-communist countries. Amer J Pol Sci 46:557–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos J (2004) Who wants political integration?: evidence from the Swedish EU-membership referendum. J Public Econ 88:1589–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachman A (1994) Taiwan: national identity and democratization. ME Sharpe

  • Yang CH, Wu YY, Lin HL (2010) Outward investment to China and local innovation of Taiwanese manufacturing firms. Jpn Econ Rev 61:538–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the editor and three anonymous referees whose comments and suggestions helped improve and clarify this manuscript. We thank Shiu-Sheng Chen, Ming-Jen Lin, Ming-Ching Louh, and the seminar participants at NTU and Academia Sinica for their helpful comments. We also thank Yu-Hsuan Wang for excellent research assistance. All errors remain ours.

Funding

We acknowledge financial support from Ministry of Science & Technology (MOST107-3017-F-002-004) and Ministry of Education (NTU-107L900203).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Fang Chiang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Klaus F. Zimmermann

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Table of industry categories

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiang, CF., Liu, JT. & Wen, TW. National identity under economic integration. J Popul Econ 32, 351–367 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-018-0705-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-018-0705-0

Keywords

  • Identity
  • Economic integration
  • Voting behavior

JEL classification

  • F50
  • Z10
  • D72