Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 915–952 | Cite as

Does income moderate the satisfaction of becoming a parent? In Germany it does and depends on education

  • Marco Le Moglie
  • Letizia MencariniEmail author
  • Chiara Rapallini
Original Paper

Abstract

We investigate the role of individual labor income as a moderator of parental subjective well-being trajectories before and after the birth of the first child in Germany. Analyzing the German Socio-Economic Panel Survey (SOEP), we found that income matters negatively for parental life satisfaction after the first birth, though with important differences by education and gender. In particular, among better educated parents, those with higher income experience a steeper decrease in their subjective well-being. Income is measured as the average of individual labor income within 3 years before the birth. We provide evidence that our results are robust to potential endogeneity between income and first childbirth using the individual labor income at 3 years from the event, and for an alternative measure, i.e. the equivalent household income. Results are discussed in terms of different aspirations and difficulties parents may experience, especially in terms of work and family balance.

Keywords

First child Subjective well-being Individual income Education Germany 

JEL Classification

J1 J13 D1 I31 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the two anonymous referees for their comments and helpful suggestions.

Funding information

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council, under the European ERC Grant Agreement no. StG-313617 (SWELL-FER: Subjective Well-being and Fertility).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aassve A, Goisis A, Sironi M (2012) Happiness and childbearing across Europe. Soc Indic Res 108(1):65–86Google Scholar
  2. Aassve A, Mencarini L, Sironi M (2015) Institutional change, happiness, and fertility. Eur Sociol Rev 31(6):749–765Google Scholar
  3. Alger I, Cox D (2013) The evolution of altruistic preferences: mothers versus fathers. Rev Econ Househ 11(3):421–446Google Scholar
  4. Andersson G (2000) The impact of labour-force participation on childbearing behaviour: pro-cyclical fertility in Sweden during the 1980s and the 1990s. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 16(4):293–333Google Scholar
  5. Andersson G, Kreyenfeld M, Mika T (2014) Welfare state context, female labour-market attachment and childbearing in Germany and Denmark. J Popul Res 31(4):287–316Google Scholar
  6. Becker GS (1960) An economic analysis of fertility. In: Demographic and economic change in developed countries. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, pp 209–240Google Scholar
  7. Becker GS (1981) Altruism in the family and selfishness in the market place. Economica 48(189):1–15Google Scholar
  8. Becker GS (1991) A treatise on the family (Revised and enlarged edition). Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker GS, Lewis HG (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ 81(2, Part 2):S279–S288Google Scholar
  10. Berninger I (2013) Women’s income and childbearing in context: First births in Denmark and Finland. Acta Sociologica 56(2):97–115Google Scholar
  11. Billari FC, Kohler H-P (2009) Fertility and happiness in the XXI century: institutions, preferences, and their interactions. In: Annual meeting of the population association of America, Detroit, April 30–May 2, 2009Google Scholar
  12. Blair-Loy M (2009) Competing devotions: career and family among women executives. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Blanchflower DG, Oswald AJ (2004) Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. J Public Econ 88(7):1359–1386Google Scholar
  14. Boyce CJ, Wood AM (2011) Personality prior to disability determines adaptation: agreeable individuals recover lost life satisfaction faster and more completely. Psychol Sci 22(11):1397–1402Google Scholar
  15. Bremhorst V, Kreyenfeld M, Lambert P (2016) Fertility progression in Germany: an analysis using flexible nonparametric cure survival models. Demogr Res 35:505–534Google Scholar
  16. Brickman P (1971) Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In: Appley M (ed) Adaptation-level theory. Academic Press, New York, pp 287–305Google Scholar
  17. Cetre S, Clark AE, Senik C (2016) Happy people have children: choice and self-selection into parenthood. Eur J Popul 32(3):445–473Google Scholar
  18. Cigno A (1986) Fertility and the tax-benefit system: a reconsideration of the theory of family taxation. Econ J 96(384):1035–1051Google Scholar
  19. Cigno A (1991) Economics of the family. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark AE (2016) Adaptation and the easterlin paradox. In: Advances in happiness research. Springer, pp 75–94Google Scholar
  21. Clark AE, Oswald AJ (2002) A simple statistical method for measuring how life events affect happiness. Int J Epidemiol 31(6):1139–1144Google Scholar
  22. Clark AE, Georgellis Y (2013) Back to baseline in Britain: adaptation in the british household panel survey. Economica 80(319):496–512Google Scholar
  23. Clark AE, Diener E, Georgellis Y, Lucas RE (2008) Lags and leads in life satisfaction: a test of the baseline hypothesis. Econ J 118(529):222–243Google Scholar
  24. Csikszentmihalyi M, Hunter J (2003) Happiness in everyday life: the uses of experience sampling. J Happiness Stud 4(2):185–199Google Scholar
  25. Di Tella R, Haisken-De New J, MacCulloch R (2010) Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel. J Econ Behav Organ 76(3):834–852Google Scholar
  26. Diener E, Lucas RE (1999) Personality and subjective well-being. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 213–229Google Scholar
  27. Diener E, Lucas RE, Scollon CN (2006) Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being. Am Psychol 61(4):305–314Google Scholar
  28. Duesenberry JS (1949) Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Dustmann C (2004) Parental background, secondary school track choice, and wages. Oxf Econ Pap 56(2):209–230Google Scholar
  30. Dyrdal GM, Lucas RE (2013) Reaction and adaptation to the birth of a child: a couple-level analysis. Dev Psychol 49(4):749–761Google Scholar
  31. Easterlin RA (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth 89:89–125Google Scholar
  32. Easterlin RA (1995) Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? J Econ Behav Organ 27(1):35–47Google Scholar
  33. Easterlin RA (2010) Well-being, front and center: a note on the Sarkozy report. Popul Dev Rev 36(1):119–124Google Scholar
  34. Engelhardt H, Prskawetz A (2004) On the changing correlation between fertility and female employment over space and time. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 20(1):35–62Google Scholar
  35. Engelhardt H, Kögel T, Prskawetz A (2004) Fertility and women’s employment reconsidered: a macro-level time-series analysis for developed countries, 1960–2000. Popul Stud 58(1):109–120Google Scholar
  36. Ermisch J, Francesconi M (2001) Family matters: impacts of family background on educational attainments. Economica 68(270):137–156Google Scholar
  37. Esping-Andersen G (2013) The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Esping-Andersen G, Billari FC (2015) Re-theorizing family demographics. Popul Dev Rev 41(1):1–31Google Scholar
  39. Ferrer-i Carbonell A, Frijters P (2004) How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Econ J 114(497):641–659Google Scholar
  40. Frejka T (2008) Overview chapter 2: parity distribution and completed family size in europe incipient decline of the two-child family model. Demogr Res 19(14):47–72Google Scholar
  41. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2000) Happiness, economy and institutions. Econ J 110(466):918–938Google Scholar
  42. Goldscheider F, Bernhardt E, Lappegård T (2015) The gender revolution: a framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Popul Dev Rev 41(2):207–239Google Scholar
  43. Goyette KA (2008) College for some to college for all: social background, occupational expectations, and educational expectations over time. Soc Sci Res 37(2):461–484Google Scholar
  44. Gregory E (2012) Ready: why women are embracing the new later motherhood. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Grossbard S, Mukhopadhyay S (2013) Children, spousal love, and happiness: an economic analysis. Rev Econ Househ 11(3):447–467Google Scholar
  46. Hart RK (2015) Earnings and first birth probability among norwegian men and women 1995–2010. Demogr Res 33:1067–1104Google Scholar
  47. Herbst CM, Ifcher J (2016) The increasing happiness of us parents. Rev Econ Househ 14(3):529–551Google Scholar
  48. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292Google Scholar
  49. Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (1999) Well-being: foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Kögel T (2004) Did the association between fertility and female employment within oecd countries really change its sign? J Popul Econ 17(1):45–65Google Scholar
  51. Kohler H-P (2012) Do children bring happiness and purpose in life. Whither the child: causes and consequences of low fertility, pp 47–75Google Scholar
  52. Kohler H-P, Behrman JR, Skytthe A (2005) Partner + children = happiness? The effects of partnerships and fertility on well-being. Popul Dev Rev 31(3):407–445Google Scholar
  53. Kohler H-P, Mencarini L (2016) The parenthood happiness puzzle: an introduction to special issue. Eur J Popul 32(3):327–338Google Scholar
  54. Kotowska I, Matysiak A, Pailhe A, Solaz A, Styrc M, Vignoli D (2010) Family and work. Second european quality of life survey. Dublin: Eurofond (The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living Conditions)Google Scholar
  55. Kreyenfeld M, Andersson G (2014) Socioeconomic differences in the unemployment and fertility nexus: evidence from Denmark and Germany. Adv Life Course Res 21:59–73Google Scholar
  56. Le Moglie M, Mencarini L, Rapallini C (2015) Is it just a matter of personality? On the role of subjective well-being in childbearing behavior. J Econ Behav Organ 117:453–475Google Scholar
  57. Lesthaeghe R, Van de Kaa DJ (1986) Twee demografische transities. Bevolking: groei en krimp, pp 9–24Google Scholar
  58. Lucas RE, Clark AE, Georgellis Y, Diener E (2003) Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: reactions to changes in marital status. J Pers Soc Psychol 84(3):527–539Google Scholar
  59. Lucas RE, Clark AE, Georgellis Y, Diener E (2004) Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction. Psychol Sci 15(1):8–13Google Scholar
  60. Luci A, Thevenon O (2011) Does economic development explain the fertility rebound in OECD countries. Population and Societies, INED, 481Google Scholar
  61. Luci-Greulich A, Thévenon O (2014) Does economic advancement ‘cause’ a re-increase in fertility? an empirical analysis for oecd countries (1960–2007). Eur J Popul 30(2):187–221Google Scholar
  62. Margolis R, Myrskylä M (2011) A global perspective on happiness and fertility. Popul Dev Rev 37(1):29–56Google Scholar
  63. Matysiak A, Mencarini L, Vignoli D (2016) Work–family conflict moderates the relationship between childbearing and subjective well-being. Eur J Popul 32(3):355–379Google Scholar
  64. McIntosh J, Munk MD (2007) Scholastic ability vs family background in educational success: evidence from danish sample survey data. J Popul Econ 20(1):101–120Google Scholar
  65. McLanahan S, Adams J (1987) Parenthood and psychological well-being. Annu Rev Sociol 13(1):237–257Google Scholar
  66. Mello ZR (2008) Gender variation in developmental trajectories of educational and occupational expectations and attainment from adolescence to adulthood. Dev Psychol 44(4):1069–1080Google Scholar
  67. Myrskylä M, Kohler H-P, Billari FC (2009) Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 460(7256):741–743Google Scholar
  68. Myrskylä M, Kohler H-P, Billari F (2011) High development and fertility: fertility at older reproductive ages and gender equality explain the positive link. MPIDR Working Paper, 2011–017 Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  69. Myrskylä M, Margolis R (2014) Happiness: before and after the kids. Demography 51(5):1843–1866Google Scholar
  70. Nomaguchi KM, Brown SL (2011) Parental strains and rewards among mothers: the role of education. J Marriage Fam 73(3):621–636Google Scholar
  71. Nomaguchi KM, Milkie MA (2003) Costs and rewards of children: the effects of becoming a parent on adults’ lives. J Marriage Fam 65(2):356–374Google Scholar
  72. OECD (2010) PISA 2009 results: overcoming social background: equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (volume II). OECD, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  73. Oswald AJ (1997) Happiness and economic performance. Econ J 107(445):1815–1831Google Scholar
  74. Proto E, Rustichini A (2015) Life satisfaction, income and personality. J Econ Psychol 48:17–32Google Scholar
  75. Rønsen M (2004) Fertility and public policies-evidence from Norway and Finland. Demogr Res 10:143–170Google Scholar
  76. Schüller S (2015) Parental ethnic identity and educational attainment of second-generation immigrants. J Popul Econ 28(4):965–1004Google Scholar
  77. Sheldon KM, Lucas RE (2014) Stability of happiness: theories and evidence on whether happiness can change. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  78. Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) (2016) Data for years 1984-2015, version 32, SOEP.  https://doi.org/10.5684/soep.v32
  79. Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2008) Economic growth and subjective well-being: reassessing the easterlin paradox. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  80. Stone P (2007) Opting out? Why women really quit careers and head home. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  81. Tasiran AC (1995) Fertility dynamics: spacing and timing of births in Sweden and the United States. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  82. Van de Kaa DJ (1987) Europe’s second demographic transition. Popul Bull 42 (1):1–59Google Scholar
  83. Vikat A (2004) Women’s labor force attachment and childbearing in Finland. Demogr Res 3:177–212Google Scholar
  84. Wagner GG, Frick JR, Schupp J (2007) The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, Evolution and Enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch 127(1):139–169Google Scholar
  85. Williams DE, Thompson JK (1993) Biology and behavior: a set-point hypothesis of psychological functioning. Behav Modif 17(1):43–57Google Scholar
  86. Zimmermann AC, Easterlin RA (2006) Happily ever after? Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and happiness in Germany. Popul Dev Rev 32(3):511–528Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public PolicyBocconi UniversityMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Economics and Management (DISEI)University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations