Not your lucky day: romantically and numerically special wedding date divorce risks
Characteristics of couples on or about their wedding day and characteristics of weddings have been shown to predict marital outcomes. Little is known, however, about how the dates of the weddings correlate with marriage durability. Using Dutch marriage and divorce registries from 1999 to 2013, this study compares the durations of marriages that began on unusually popular wedding dates with marriages on ordinary dates. We identify several distinct types of popular dates, including Valentine’s Day and numerically special days (dates with the same or sequential number values, e.g., 9.9.99, 1.2.03), showing that on an adjusted basis, the incidence of weddings on such dates was 137–509% higher than ordinary dates. The hazard odds of divorce for these special-date weddings were 18–36% higher than ordinary-date weddings. Sorting on couples’ observable characteristics accounts for some of the higher divorce risks, but even after controlling for these characteristics, special-date weddings were more vulnerable, with 10–17% higher divorce odds compared to ordinary dates. These relationships are even stronger for couples who have not married before.
KeywordsMarriage Divorce Valentine’s Day Commitment Weddings
This research was supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course. The authors thank Andrew Cherlin, Robert Haveman, Jongsay Yong, colleagues at the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, workshop participants at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. However, the authors’ findings and views are their own and should not be attributed to the Melbourne Institute.
Both authors were supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Associated Press (2009) “Nine times the bliss: 9/9/09 big lucky day for weddings.” nydailynews.com September 9. Accessed May 29, 2016. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/times-bliss-9-9-09-big-lucky-day-las-vegas-weddings-article-1.164851Google Scholar
- Dyer TFT (1881) Domestic folk-lore. London: Cassell, Petter, GalpinGoogle Scholar
- Mascarenhas, Rohan (2010) “Thousands of marrying couples make 10/10/10 a date to remember.” nj.com October 10. Accessed May 29, 2016. http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/10/thousands_of_weddings_make_101.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Morgan, Hillary J., and Phillip R. Shaver (1999) “Attachment processes and commmitment to romantic relationships.” In Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability, edited by Jeffrey M. Adams and Warren H. Jones, 109–24. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4773-0_6
- Murstein, Bernard (1999) “The relationship of exchange and commitment.” In Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability, edited by Jeffrey M. Adams and Warren H. Jones, 205–20. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4773-0_12Google Scholar
- Sobotka T, Adigüzel F (2002) Religiosity and spatial demographic differences in the Netherlands. University of Groningen, GroningenGoogle Scholar
- Ting, Inga (2015) “The science behind the weird pattern in Australia’s most popular wedding dates.” Sydney Sun Herald, December 6, first ed.: 7. http://www.smh.com.au/national/what-are-the-most-popular-wedding-dates-in-australia-20151204-glfrodGoogle Scholar
- van Loon P, Rogier M v d A, van Dolder D, Wang T (2016) Number preferences in lotteries. Judgm Decis Mak 11(3):243–259Google Scholar
- Walker, Peter (2011) “Global wedding rush marks 11-11-11.” theguardian.com November 11. Accessed May 29, 2016. http://www.theguardian.com/news/blog/2011/nov/11/11-11-11-11-11-date-eventsGoogle Scholar