- 460 Downloads
We consider a bargaining model in which husband and wife decide on the allocation of time and disposable income, and fertility. Since her bargaining power would go down otherwise more strongly, the wife agrees to have a child only if the husband also leaves the labor market for a while. The daddy months subsidy enables the couple to overcome a hold-up problem and thereby improves efficiency. However, the same ruling harms other types of couples and may also reduce welfare in an endogenous taxation framework.
KeywordsFertility Bargaining Family policy Labor supply
JEL ClassificationD13 H21 J13 J18 J22
We would like to thank Dan Anderberg, Rainald Borck, Alessandro Cigno, Hélène Couprie, Elisabeth Gugl, Alexander Kemnitz, Kai Konrad, Panu Poutvaara, Kerstin Schneider, two anonymous referees, and participants of seminars and conferences at Aix-en-Provence, Berlin, Dresden, Hamburg, Klagenfurt, Lugano, and Munich for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Basu K (2006) Gender and say: a model of household behaviour with endogenously determined balance of power. Econ J 116(511):558–580Google Scholar
- Bertrand M, Goldin C, Katz LF (2010) Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. Am Econ J: Appl Econ 2(3):228–255Google Scholar
- Blomquist S, Christiansen V, Micheletto L (2010) Public provision of private goods and nondistortionary marginal tax rates. Am Econ J: Econ Policy 2(2):1–27Google Scholar
- Geisler E, Kreyenfeld M (2012) How policy matters: Germany’s parental leave benefit reform and fathers’ behavior 1999–2009. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research Working Paper 2012-021, RostockGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2015) OECD Family database. www.oecd.org/social/family/database.htm
- Ruhm CJ (1998) The economic consequences of parental leave mandates: lessons from Europe. Quart J Econ 113(1):285–317Google Scholar
- Sinn H-W (2001) The value of children and immigrants in a pay-as-you-go pension system: a proposal for a transition to a funded system. ifo Stud 47(1):77–94Google Scholar