We use a population survey of the Chinese adult population—2010 Chinese Family Panel Studies (CFPS) modeled after the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. We find that being the oldest child gives an education benefit to male and not female children who are often assigned supervisory roles for younger siblings. Most importantly, an increase in the fraction of female siblings leads to a significant increase in education of Chinese men and to a lesser extent Chinese women. This effect is concentrated among those with rural Hukou. In China, male children absorbed more education resources so that in a credit constrained family, increases in fraction of siblings who are sisters frees up resources for educating boys. This is less so for girls since their education was lower and additional resources would not be used for them.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Tibet, Qinghai, Xinjiang, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia, Hainan, Hong Kong, and Macao were not included.
Even though OCP started from 1979 (it was written into the Constitution in 1982 and was effective since 1983), we used a more strict criteria of 1976 (aged 34) in case OCP had been informally enforced in some areas before 1979.
Note that the Hukou status used here is the Hukou status in 2010, which might be different from the Hukou status at birth due to migration/urbanization. In our regression, we include a dummy for father’s Hukou status to control for such effect.
We observe that the number of siblings are high even for the cohort subject to OCP in urban area, and this is consistent with census 2010. This could be due to three reasons: (1) because we used a very strict year standard to identify the OCP era, the youngest group still include children born before OCP; (2) children born in the OCP era may have older siblings who were born before OCP; (3) as mentioned in footnote 3, a certain fraction of the urban households as defined this way may actually be rural when the child(ren) was/were born, so the number of siblings could still be larger.
The proportion of singletons is 1.8 and 9.4 % for the 1966–1975 (age 35–44) and 1976–1985 (age 25–34) cohorts, respectively. Thus, not surprisingly, including singletons does not significantly change our main results.
The results were very similar when we included a control for number of siblings. Not surprisingly in light of the data summarized above in Tables 3 and 4, an increase in the number of siblings is associated with fewer years of schooling of both male and female respondents, consistent with previous studies (Blake 1989). The standard interpretation is that increasing number of siblings reduces each child’s access to remaining family resources (Cáceres-Delpiano 2006; Li et al. 2008). This effect is stronger in the younger age group, most likely reflecting the fact that there are economies of scale and a reduction of a single sibling is a bigger proportionate effect in the younger sample.
We thank the editor for suggesting to do this test.
Ananat EO, Michaels G (2008) The effect of marital breakup on the income distribution of women with children. J Hum Resour 43(3):611–629
Barcellos SH, Carvalho LS, Lleras-Muney A (2014) Child gender and parental investments in India: are boys and girls treated differently? Am Econ J: App Econ 6(1):157–189
Becker GS, Lewis HG (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ 81(2):S279–S288
Ben-Porath Y, Welch F (1976) Do sex preferences really matter? Q J Econ 90(2):285–307
Black SE, Devereux PJ, Salvanes KG (2005) The more the merrier? The effect of family size and birth order on children’s education. Q J Econ 120(2):669–700
Blake J (1989) Number of siblings and educational attainment. Science 245(493):32–36
Butcher KF, Case A (1994) The effect of sibling sex composition on women’s education and earnings. Q J Econ 109(3):531–563
Cáceres-Delpiano J (2006) The impacts of family size on investment in child quality. J Hum Resour 41(4):738–754
Chen Y, Li H, Meng L (2013) Prenatal sex selection and missing girls in China: evidence from the diffusion of diagnostic ultrasound. J Hum Resour 48(1):36–70
Chen SH, Chen YC, Liu JT (2014) The impact of family composition on educational achievement. NBER Working Paper, No. 20443
Chu J (2001) Prenatal sex determination and sex-selective abortion in rural central China. Popul Dev Rev 27(2):259–281
Conley D (2000) Sibship sex composition: effects on educational attainment. Soc Sci Res 29:441–457
Dahl GB, Moretti E (2008) The demand for sons. Rev Econ Stud 75(4):1085–1120
Das Gupta M (1987) Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab, India. Popul Dev Rev 13(1):77–100
Deuchler M (1992) The Confucian transformation of Korea: a study of society and ideology, Harvard-Yenching Monograph Series No. 36, Harvard University Asia Center
Garg A, Morduch J (1998) Sibling rivalry and the gender gap: evidence from child health outcomes in Ghana. J Popul Econ 11(4):471–493
Hauser RM, Kuo HD (1998) Does the gender composition of sibships affect women’s educational attainment? J Hum Resour 33(3):644–657
Jayachandran S, Kuziemko I (2011) Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys: evidence and implications for child health in India. Q J Econ 126(3):1485–1538
Kaestner R (1997) Are brothers really better? Sibling sex composition and educational achievement revisited. J Hum Resour 32(2):250–284
Lei X, Smith JP, Hu Y, Zhao Y (2012) Gender differences in cognition among older adults in China. J Hum Resour 47(4):951–971
Li H, Zhang J, Zhu Y (2008) The quantity-quality trade-off of children in a developing country: identification using Chinese twins. Demography 45(1):223–243
Lundberg S, Rose E (2002) The effects of sons and daughters on men’s labor supply and wages. Rev Econ Stat 84(2):251–268
Merli MG, Smith HL (2002) Has the Chinese family planning policy been successful in changing fertility preferences? Demography 39(3):557–572
Morduch J (2000) Sibling rivalry in Africa. Am Econ Rev 90(2):405–409
Powell B, Steelman LC (1990) Beyond sibship size: sibling density, sex composition, and educational outcomes. Soc Forces 69(1):181–206
Rose E (2000) Gender bias, credit constraints and time allocation in rural India. Econ J 110(465):738–758
Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the adolescent self image. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Smith JP, Lei X, Shen Y, Zhou G (2014) Fertility, gender preference, the One Child Policy and life satisfaction in China. Working Paper
Wei S, Zhang X (2011) The competitive saving motive: evidence from rising sex ratios and savings in China. J Polit Econ 119(3):511–564
Yu W, Su K (2006) Gender, sibship structure, and educational inequality in Taiwan: son preference revisited. J Marriage Fam 68(4):1057–1068
This research was supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging (P01-AG022481 and R37-AG025529) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 71490732 and 2016KEY02). The authors thank the editor and anonymous referees of this journal and recognize their help and guidance.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Responsible editor: Junsen Zhang
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lei, X., Shen, Y., Smith, J.P. et al. Sibling gender composition’s effect on education: evidence from China. J Popul Econ 30, 569–590 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-016-0614-z
- Gender composition