Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 69–91 | Cite as

Offline effects of online connecting: the impact of broadband diffusion on teen fertility decisions

Original Paper

Abstract

Broadband (high-speed) internet access expanded rapidly from 1999 to 2007 and is associated with higher economic growth and labor market activity. In this paper, we examine whether the rollout also affected the social connections that teens make. Specifically, we look at the relationship between increased broadband access and teen fertility. We hypothesize that increasing access to high-speed internet can influence fertility decisions by changing the size of the market as well as increasing the information available to participants in the market. We seek to understand both the overall effect of broadband internet on teen fertility and the mechanisms underlying this effect. Our results suggest that increased broadband access explains at least 7 % of the decline in the teen birth rate between 1999 and 2007. Although we focus on social markets, this work contributes more broadly to an understanding of how new technology interacts with existing markets.

Keywords

Fertility Birth rates Broadband New media 

JEL codes

J13 J18 

References

  1. Anders A, Ingvil G, Magne M (2013) “The skill complementarity of broadband internet,” IZA Working Paper No. 7762. http://ftp.iza.org/dp7762.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2014
  2. Atasoy H (2013) The effects of broadband internet expansion on labor market outcomes. Ind Labor Relat Rev 66:315–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellou A (2015) The impact of Internet diffusion on marriage rates: evidence from the broadband market. J Popul Econ 28(2):265–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benotsch E, Snipes D, Martin A, Bull S (2013) Sexting, substance use, and sexual risk behavior in young adults. J Adolesc Health 52(3): 307–313Google Scholar
  5. Bhargava S, Pathania V (2013) Driving under the (cellular) influence. Am Econ J Econ Pol 5:92–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhuller M, Havnes T, Leuven E, Mogstad M (2013) “Broadband internet: An information superhighway to sex crime?” Rev Econ Stud 80(4): 1237–1266Google Scholar
  7. Cunningham S, Kendall T (2011) Prostitution 2.0: the changing face of sex work. J Urban Econ 69:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahl G, DellaVigna S (2009) Does movie violence increase violent crime? Q J Econ 124:677–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahl G, Price J (2012) The economists approach to studying the impact of media on the family. Fam Relat 61:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dettling, Lisa J (2014) Broadband in the labor market: the impact of residential high speed internet on married women’s labor force participation mimeo. http://econweb.umd.edu/~dettling/dettling_internet.pdf downloaded on 12-12-14
  11. Fletcher J (2012) Peer influences on adolescent alcohol consumption: evidence using an instrumental variables/fixed effect approach. J Popul Econ 25:1265–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flood S, King M, Ruggles S, Warren JR (2015) Integrated public use microdata series, current population survey: version 4.0. [Machine-readable database]. University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  13. Horrigan J (2009) Home broadband adoption 2009. Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Jensen R, Oster E (2009) The power of TV: cable television and women’s status in India. Q J Econ 124:1057–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kane T, Staiger D (1996) Teen motherhood and abortion access. Q J Econ 111:467–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kearney M, Levine P (2015a) Investigating recent trends in the U.S. teen birth rate. J Health Econ 41:15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kearney M, Levine P (2015b) Media influences on social outcomes: the impact of MTV’s 16 and Pregnant on teen childbearing. Am Econ Rev 105(12):3597–3632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolko J (2012a) Broadband and local growth. J Urban Econ 71:100–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kolko J (2012b) Technical appendix: does broadband boost local economic development? Working Paper. Public Policy Institute of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  20. La Ferrara E, Chong A, Duryea S (2012) Soap operas and fertility: evidence from Brazil. Am Econ J Appl Econ 4:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lenhart A (2012a) Teens, smartphones and texting. Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. Lenhart A (2012b) Teens and online video. Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Levine PB (2004) Sex and consequences: abortion, public policy, and the economics of fertility. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  24. Madden M, Lenhart A, Duggan M, Cortesi S, Gasser U (2013) Teens and technology 2013. Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. Olken B (2009) Do TV and radio destroy social capital? Evidence from Indonesian villages. Am Econ J Appl Econ 1:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Palsson C (2014) That Smarts!: smartphones and child injuries. Working Paper. Department of Economics, Yale University. Yale University, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  27. Redelmeier D, Tibshirani R (1997) Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. N Engl J Med 336:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Regnerus M, Gordon D, Price J (2015) Documenting pornography use in America: a comparative analysis of methodological approaches. J Sex Res 18:1–9Google Scholar
  29. Rideout V, Foehr U, Roberts D (2010) Generation M2: media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  30. Sabia J, Rees D (2012) Does the number of sex partners affect educational attainment? Evidence from female respondents to the Add Health. J Popul Econ 25(1):89–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Temple J, HyeJeong C (2014) Longitudinal association between teen sexting and sexual behavior. Pediatrics doi:10.1542/peds.2014-1974
  32. Temple J, Paul J, van den Berg P, Le V, McElhany A, Temple B (2012) Teen sexting and its association with sexual behaviors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 166:828–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy and Unplanned Parenthood (2008) Sex and tech: results from a survey of teens and young adults. The National Campaign, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. Trudeau J (2015) The role of new media on teen sexual behaviors and fertility outcomes—the case of ‘16 and pregnant’. South Econ J Forthcoming 82(3):975–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Survey, 1984-2009.Google Scholar
  36. U.S. Department of Commerce (2011) Exploring the digital nation: computer and internet use at home, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  37. U.S. Department of Commerce (2013) Exploring the digital nation: America’s emerging online experience. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  38. Yakusheva O, Fletcher J (2015) Learning from teen childbearing experiences of close friends: evidence using miscarriages as a natural experiment. Rev Econ Stat 97(1):29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zickuhr K, Smith A (2013) Home broadband. Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.School of Public Affairs and IZAArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations