Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 1063–1082 | Cite as

Does the marriage market sex ratio affect parental sex selection? Evidence from the Chinese census

  • Xing Li
  • M. W. Luke Chan
  • Byron G. Spencer
  • Wei Yang
Original Paper

Abstract

Recent increases in the (male/female) sex ratio at birth in eastern Asia are thought to be associated with a preference for sons and to result from parental sex selection. However, males are less likely to marry and to have offspring as the ratio increases, and that decreases the expected number of grandchildren. Using data from the 2000 Chinese census, we test whether the sex ratio in the marriage market has an effect on the gender of subsequent births and hence on the sex ratio of the birth cohort. The slow population growth caused by the Great Famine in the early 1960s and the quick recovery that followed produced major changes in the sex ratio for those of marriageable age two decades later. We estimate that an increase of 1 % in the number of marriageable males relative to females, the marriage market sex ratio, would decrease the probability of having a son by 0.02 percentage points. That implies that the Great Famine, which occurred around 1960, led to an increase in the early 1980s of 5.8 extra male births per 100 females.

Keywords

Parental sex selection Marriage squeeze Marriage market sex ratio Missing women 

JEL Classification

J11 J12 J13 

References

  1. Almond D, Edlund L, Li H, Zhang J (2010) Long-term effects of early-life development: evidence from the 1959 to 1961 China Famine. In: Ito T, Rose A (eds) The economic consequences of demographic change in East Asia, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson S, Ray D (2010) Missing women: age and disease. Rev Econ Stud 77:1262–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angrist J (2002) How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor market? Evidence from America's Second Generation. Q J Econ 117(3):997–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banister J (1987) China’s Changing Population, Standford University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker GS (1991) A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 119:249–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhaskar V (2011) Sex selection and gender balance. Am Econ J Microecon 3:214–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Browning M, Bourguignon F, Chiappori P-A, Lechene V (1994) Income and outcomes: a structural model of intra-household allocation. J Polit Econ 102:1067–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Li H, Meng L (2013) Prenatal sex selection and missing girls in China: evidence from the diffusion of diagnostic ultrasound. J Hum Resour 48(1):36–70Google Scholar
  10. Chiappori P-A (1992) Collective labor supply and welfare. J Polit Econ 100:437–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiappori P-A, Fortin B, Lacroix G (2002) Marriage market, divorce legislation, and household labor supply. J Polit Econ 110:37–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chu J (2001) Prenatal sex determination and sex-selective abortion in rural Central China. Popul Dev Rev 27(2):259–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coale AJ (1981) Population trends, population policy, and population studies in China. Popul Dev Rev pp. 85–97Google Scholar
  14. Coale AJ (1991) Excess female mortality and the balance of the sexes in the population: an estimate of the number of "missing females". Popul Dev Rev 17(3):517–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahl BG, Moretti E (2008) The demand for sons. Rev Econ Stud 75:1085–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denton FT, Spencer BG (2014) Exploring the population implications of male preference when the sex probabilities at birth can be altered. Demogr Res 31(25):757–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dikotter F (2010) Mao’s Great Famine: the history of China’s most devastating catastrophe, 1958–1962, WalkerGoogle Scholar
  18. Donald SG, Lang K (2007) Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. Rev Econ Stat 89(2):221–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ebenstein A (2008) The “missing girls” of china and the unintended consequence of the one child policy. J Hum Resour 45(1):87–115Google Scholar
  20. Edlund L (1999) Son preference, sex ratios, and marriage patterns. J Polit Econ 107(6):1275–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edlund L, Li H, Yi J, Zhang J (2013) Sex ratios and crime: evidence from China. Rev Econ Stat 95(5):1520–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grech V, Savona-Ventura C, Vassallo-Agius P (2002) Unexplained differences in sex ratios at birth in Europe and North America. BMJ 325(7357):195–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li L, Wu X (2011) Gender of children, bargaining power, and intrahousehold resource allocation in China. J Hum Resour 46(2):295–315Google Scholar
  24. Li H, Yi J, Zhang J (2011) Estimating the effect of the one-child policy on the sex ratio imbalance in China: identification based on the difference-in-differences. Demography 48:1535–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin JY (1990) Collectivization and China’s agricultural crisis in 1959–1961. J Polit Econ 46(2):1228–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu H (2014) The quality-quantity trade-off: evidence from the relaxation of China’s one-child policy. J Popul Econ 27:565–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meng X, Qian N, Yared P (2015) The institutional causes of China’s Great Famine, 1959–1961. NBER working paper, No. 16361Google Scholar
  28. Moulton B (1990) An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables in micro units. Rev Econ Stat 72(2):334–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neelakanta U, Tertilt M (2008) A note on marriage market clearing. Econ Lett 101(2):103–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perkins DH, Yusuf S (1984) Rural Development in China. Johns Hopkins University, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  31. Rao V (1993) The rising price of husbands: a hedonic analysis of dowry increases in rural India. J Polit Econ 101:666–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sen A (1992) Missing women. Br Med J 304:587–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siow A (1998) Differential fecundity, markets, and gender roles. J Polit Econ 106(2):534–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thaxton R (2008) Catastrophe and contention in rural China: Mao’s Great Leap Forward Famine and the origins of righteous resistance in Da Fo Village. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wei S-J, Zhang X (2011) The competitive saving motive: evidence from rising sex ratios and savings rates in China. J Polit Econ 119(3):511–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang W (2015) An endogenous sex selection model Unpublished ManuscriptGoogle Scholar
  37. Yao S (1999) A note on the causal factors of China’s Famine in 1959–1961. J Polit Econ 107(6):1365–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang J, Chan W (1999) Dowry and wife's welfare: a theoretical and empirical analysis. J Polit Econ 107(4):786–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xing Li
    • 1
  • M. W. Luke Chan
    • 2
  • Byron G. Spencer
    • 3
  • Wei Yang
    • 4
  1. 1.School of FinanceNanjing University of Finance and EconomicsNanjingChina
  2. 2.Economics DepartmentMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  3. 3.DeGroote School of BusinessMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  4. 4.Economics Department, College of Business and Public AdministrationUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA

Personalised recommendations