Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 657–686 | Cite as

Immigration and prices: quasi-experimental evidence from Syrian refugees in Turkey

Original Paper

Abstract

We exploit the regional variation in the unexpected (or forced) inflow of Syrian refugees as a natural experiment to estimate the impact of immigration on consumer prices in Turkey. Using a difference-in-differences strategy and a comprehensive data set on the regional prices of CPI items, we find that general level of consumer prices has declined by approximately 2.5 % due to immigration. Prices of goods and services have declined in similar magnitudes. We highlight that the channel through which the price declines take place is the informal labor market. Syrian refugees supply inexpensive informal labor and, thus, substitute the informal native workers especially in informal-labor intensive sectors. We document that prices in these sectors have fallen by around 4 %, while the prices in the formal labor-intensive sectors have almost remained unchanged. Increase in the supply of informal immigrant workers generates labor cost advantages and keeps prices lower in the informal labor-intensive sectors.

Keywords

Immigration Consumer prices Syrian refugees Natural experiment Informal employment 

JEL Classification

C21 E31 J46 J61 

Supplementary material

148_2016_583_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
(DOCX 24 KB)

References

  1. AFAD (2013) Syrian refugees in Turkey 2013: field survey results. Turkish Disaster and Emergency Management PresidencyGoogle Scholar
  2. Akgunduz YE, van den Berg M, Hassink W (2015) The impact of refugee crises on host labor markets: the case of the Syrian refugee crisis in Turkey. IZA Discussion Paper No: 8841Google Scholar
  3. Alix-Garcia J, Saah D (2009) The effect of refugee inflows on host communities: evidence from Tanzania. World Bank Econ Rev 24:148–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentolila S, Dolado JJ, Jimeno JF (2008) Does immigration affect the phillips curve? Some evidence for Spain. Eur Econ Rev 52:1398–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borjas GJ (1987) Self-selection and the earnings of immigrants. Am Econ Rev 77:531–553Google Scholar
  6. Borjas GJ (1994) The economics of immigration. J Econ Lit 32:1667–1717Google Scholar
  7. Borjas GJ, Bronars SG, Trejo SJ (1992) Self-selection and internal migration in the United States. J Urban Econ 32:159–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Card D (1990) The impact of the mariel boatlift on the miami labor market. Ind Labor Relat Rev 43:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Card D, Krueger AB (1994) Minimum wages and employment: a case study of the Fast-Food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Am Econ Rev 84:772–793Google Scholar
  10. Carrington WJ, de Lima PJF (1996) The impact of 1970s repatriates from Africa on the Portuguese labor market. Ind Labor Relat Rev 49:330–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ceritoglu E, Gurcihan Yunculer HB, Torun H, Tumen S (2015) The impact of Syrian refugees on natives’ labor market outcomes in Turkey: evidence from a quasi-experimental design. Unpublished manuscript, Central Bank of the Republic of TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen-Goldner S, Paserman DM (2011) The dynamic impact of immigration on natives’ labor market outcomes: evidence from Israel. Eur Econ Rev 55:1027–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cortes P (2008) The effect of low-skilled immigration on U.S. prices: evidence from CPI data. J Polit Econ 116:381–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedberg RM (2001) The impact of mass migration on the Israeli labor market. Q J Econ 116:1373–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glitz A (2012) The labor market impact of immigration: a quasi-experiment exploiting immigrant location rules in Germany. J Labor Econ 30:175–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gould ED, Lavy V, Paserman DM (2009) Does immigration affect the long-term educational outcomes of natives? Quasi-experimental evidence. Econ J 119:1243–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunt J (1992) The impact of the 1962 repatriates from Algeria on the French labor market. Ind Labor Relat Rev 43:556–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lach S (2007) Immigration and prices. J Polit Econ 115:548–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mansour H (2010) The effects of labor supply shocks on labor market outcomes: evidence from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Labour Econ 17:930–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maystadt J-F, Verwimp P (2014) Winners and losers among a refugee-hosting population. Econ Dev Cult Chang 62:769–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moulton BR (1986) Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates. J Econ 32:385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mullainathan S, Bertrand M, Duflo E (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 119:249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paserman DM (2013) Do high-skill immigrants raise productivity? Evidence from Israeli manufacturing firms, 1990–1999. IZA Journal of Migration 2:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saarela J, Finnas F (2009) Forced migration and mortality in the very long term: did Perestroika affect death rates also in Finland? Demography 46:575–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tumen S (2015) The use of natural experiments in migration research. IZA World of LaborGoogle Scholar
  26. Tumen S (2016) The economic impact of Syrian refugees on host countries: quasi-experimental evidence from Turkey. Forthcoming, American Economic ReviewGoogle Scholar
  27. Zachariadis M (2011) Immigration and international prices: an initial assessment. Econ Lett 110:83–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zachariadis M (2012) Immigration and international prices. J Int Econ 87:298–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research and Monetary Policy DepartmentCentral Bank of the Republic of TurkeyAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.IZABonnGermany

Personalised recommendations