Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 167–195 | Cite as

Economic conditions and the living arrangements of young adults: 1960 to 2011

Original Paper

Abstract

The recent economic downturn in the USA has coincided with stories of young men and women choosing to remain at home, or to move back in with their parents since they cannot afford to live independently. This paper first describes changes in parental coresidence over the last half-century, and then assesses the causal link between economic conditions and living arrangements among young adults using data on more than 15 million individuals from 1960 to 2011. Comparing changes in economic conditions across US states to changes in living arrangements, I find that fewer jobs, low wages, and high rental costs all lead to increases in the numbers of men and women living with their parents. The magnitudes of the effects are quite large: for men, I estimate that changes in economic factors alone are large enough to have caused the observed changes in parental coresidence between 1970 and 2011.

Keywords

Living arrangements Impact of the great recession Parental coresidence Household formation 

JEL Classification

J11 J12 R20 

References

  1. Becker GS (1981) A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates. Q J Econ 119(1):249–275CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bitler M, Gelbach JB, Hoynes HW, Zavodny M (2004) The impact of welfare reform on marriage and divorce. Demography 41(2):213–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Card D, Lemieux T (2000) Adapting to Circumstances: The Evolution of Work, School, and Living Arrangements Among North American Youth. In: Youth Employment and Joblessness in Advanced Countries: nber.org, pp. 171–214Google Scholar
  5. Carlson M, McLanahan S, England P (2004) Union formation in fragile families. Demography 41(2):237–261PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cigno A, Giannelli G, Rosati F (2006) Is there such a thing as a family constitution? A test based on credit rationing. Rev Econ Househ 4:183–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox D (1987) Motives for private income transfers. J Polit Econ 95(3):508–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox D (1990) Intergenerational transfers and liquidity Constraints. Q J Econ 105(1):187–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danziger S, Jakubson G, Schwartz S, Smolensky E (1982) Work and welfare as determinants of female poverty and household headship. Q J Econ 97(3):519–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards KA, Hertel-Fernandez A (2010) The Kids Aren’t Alright A Labor Market Analysis of Young Workers. Technical report, Economic Policy InstituteGoogle Scholar
  11. Ermisch J (1999) Prices, parents, and young people’s household formation. J Urban Econ 45:47–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glick PC, Lin S-L (1986) More young adults are living with their parents: who are they?. J Marriage Fam 48(1):107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldscheider FK, DaVanzo J (1985) Living arrangements and the transition to adulthood. Demography 22(4):545–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldscheider FK, DaVanzo J (1989) Pathways to independent living in early adulthood: marriage, semiautonomy, and premarital residential independence. Demography 26(4):597–614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Haurin DR, Henderschott PH, Kim D (1993) The impact of real rents and wages on household formation. Rev Econ Stat 75:284–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes ME (2003) Home economics: metropolictan labor and housing markets and domestic arrangements in young adulthood. Soc Forces 81(4):1399–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaplan G (2012) Moving back home: insurance against labor market risk. J Polit Econ 120(3):446–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lichter DT, McLaughlin DK, Ribar DC (2002) Economic restructuring and the retreat from marriage. Soc Sci Res 31:230–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McElroy MB (1985) The joint determination of household membership and market work: the case of young men. J Labor Econ 3(3):293–316MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McLaughlin DK, Lichter DT (1997) Poverty and the marital behavior of young women. J Marriage Fam 59:582–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moffitt R (1992) Incentive effects of the U.S. welfare system: a review. J Econ Lit 30(1):1–61Google Scholar
  22. Olsen RJ, Farkas G (1990) The effect of economic opportunity and family background on adolescent cohabitation and childbearing among low-income blacks. J Labor Econ 8(3):341–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roberts S (2010) Facing a Financial Pinch, and Moving in with Mom and Dad, New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenzweig MR, Wolpin KI (1993) Intergenerational support and the life-cycle incomes of young men and their parents: human capital investments, coresidence, and intergenerational financial transfers. J Labor Econ 11(1):84–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruggles S, Sobek M, Alexander T, Fitch CA, Goeken R, Hall PK, King M, Ronnander C (2008) Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 4.0 [Machine-readable database], Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruiz RR (2010) Recession Spurs Interest in Graduate, Law Schools, New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  27. Saks RE, Wozniak A (2011) Labor reallocation over the business cycle: new evidence from internal migration. J Labor Econ 29(4):697–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sassler S, Schoen R (1999) The effects of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. J Marriage Fam 61(1):147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shin D, Solon G (2008) Trends in Men’s Earnings Volatility: What Does the Panel Study of Income Dynamics Show? National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper, No. 14075Google Scholar
  30. Smock PJ, Manning WD (1997) Cohabiting partners’ economic circumstances and marriage. Demography 34(3):331–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sweeney MM (2002) Two decades of family change: the shifting economic foundations of marriage. Am Sociol Rev 67(1):132–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang W, Morin R (2009) Home for the Holidays... and Every Other Day, Technical report, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  33. Whittington LA, Peters HE (1996) Economic incentives for financial and residential dependence. Demography 33(1):82–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wozniak A (2010) Are college graduates more responsive to distant labor market opportunities? J Hum Resour 45(4):944–970Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Policy Analysis and ManagementCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations