Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 133–157 | Cite as

Alcohol consumption and risky sexual behavior among young adults: evidence from minimum legal drinking age laws

  • Ceren Ertan YörükEmail author
  • Barış K. Yörük
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper exploits the discrete jump in alcohol consumption at the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) in the USA and uses a regression discontinuity design to investigate the relationship between drinking and risky sexual behaviors among young adults. Using confidential data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (1997 Cohort), we document that young adults tend to drink up to 2.1 days more once they are granted legal access to alcohol at age 21. Although the discrete jump in alcohol consumption at the MLDA is associated with an increase in the probability of having sex by up to 7.8 percentage points, it does not have a significant impact on the probability of engaging in risky sexual behaviors among young adults. We also document that the effect of the MLDA on the probability of using several different birth control methods is not significant for those who had sex in the past 4 weeks. These results are robust under alternative specifications and imply that although the MLDA law is quite effective in reducing alcohol consumption among young adults, spillover effects of this law on risky sexual behaviors are relatively limited.

Keywords

Alcohol consumption Minimum legal drinking age Risky sexual behavior Sexual activity 

JEL Classifications

I10 I18 J13 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper uses confidential data provided by Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the BLS.

References

  1. Arkes J, Klerman JA (2009) Understanding the link between the economy and teenage sexual behavior and fertility outcomes. J Popul Econ 22:517–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentler PM, Newcomb MD (1986) Personality, sexual behavior and drug use revealed through latent variable methods. Clin Psychol Rev 6:363–-385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butcher AH, Thompson T, O’Neal E (1991) HIV-related sexual behavior of college students. J Am Coll Health 40:115–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrell SE, Hoekstra M, West JE (2011) Does drinking impair college performance? Evidence from a regression discontinuity approach. J Public Econ 95:54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter C (2005) Youth alcohol use and risky sexual behavior: evidence from underage drunk driving laws. J Health Econ 24:613–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter C, Dobkin C (2009) The effect of alcohol consumption on mortality: regression discontinuity evidence from the minimum drinking age. Am Econ J: Appl Econ 1:164–182Google Scholar
  7. Carpenter C, Dobkin C (2011) The minimum legal drinking age and public health. J Economic Perspect 25:133–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng MY, Fan J, Marron JS (1997) On automatic boundary correction. Ann Stat 25:1691–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesson H, Harrison P, Kassler W (2000) Sex under the influence: the effect of alcohol policy on sexually transmitted disease rates in the United States. J Law Econ 43:215–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper ML, Peirce RS, Huselid RF (1994) Substance use and sexual risk-taking among black adolescents and white adolescents. Health Psychol 13:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dee TS (1999) State alcohol policies, teen drinking and traffic fatalities. J Public Econ 72:289–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dee TS (2001) Minimum legal drinking ages and teen childbearing. J Hum Resour 36:823–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ertan Yörük C, Yörük BK (2012) The impact of drinking on psychological well-being: evidence from minimum drinking age laws in the United States. Soc Sci Med 75:1844–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grossman M, Markowitz S (2005) I did what last night? Adolescent risky sexual behaviors and substance use. East Econ J 31:383–405Google Scholar
  15. Hahn J, Todd P, van der Klaauw W (2001) Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica 69:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Imbens G, Lemieux T (2008) Regression discontinuity designs: a guide to practice. J Economet 142:615–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Imbens G, Kalyanamaran K (2012) Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Rev Econ Stat 79:933–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keng S, Huffman WE (2010) Binge drinking and labor market success: a longitudinal study on young people. J Popul Econ 23:303–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kreft SF, Epling NM (2007) Do border crossings contribute to underage motor-vehicle fatalities? An analysis of Michigan border crossings. Can J Econ 40:765–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee DS, Lemieux T (2009) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. NBER working paper no. 02138.Google Scholar
  21. Lovenheim MF, Slemrod J (2010) The fatal toll of driving to drink: the effect of minimum legal drinking age evasion on traffic fatalities. J Health Econ 29:62–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malamud O, Pop-Eleches C (2011) Home computer use and the development of human capital. Q J Econ 126:987–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miron JA, Tetelbaum E (2009) Does the minimum drinking age save lives? Econ Inq 47:317–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mott FL, Haurin RJ (1988) Linkages between sexual activity and alcohol and drug use among American adolescents. Fam Plann Perspect 20:15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rashad I, Kaestner R (2004) Teenage sex, drugs and alcohol use: problems identifying the cause of risky behaviors. J Health Econ 23:493503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reece M, Herbenick D, Schick V, Sanders SA, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD (2010) Condom use rates in a national probability sample of males and females ages 14 to 94 in the United States. J Sex Med 7:291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rees D, Argys L, Averett S (2001) New evidence on the relationship between substance use and adolescent sexual behavior. J Health Econ 20:835–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sen B (2002) Does alcohol-use increase the risk of sexual intercourse among adolescents? Evidence from the NLSY97. J Health Econ 21:1085–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Staton M (1999) Gender differences in substance use and initiation of sexual intercourse. Popul Res Policy Rev 18:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wagenaar AC, Toomey TL (2002) Effects of minimum drinking age laws: review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000. J Stud Alcohol 14:206–225Google Scholar
  31. Yörük BK, Ertan Yörük C (2011) The impact of minimum legal drinking age laws on alcohol consumption, smoking, and marijuana use: evidence from a regression discontinuity design using exact date of birth. J Health Econ 30:740–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yörük BK, Ertan Yörük C (2013) The impact of minimum legal drinking age laws on alcohol consumption, smoking, and marijuana use revisited. J Health Econ 32:477–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementThe Sage CollegesAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations