Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 1175–1193 | Cite as

The effect of church tax on church membership

  • Teemu Lyytikäinen
  • Torsten SantavirtaEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, we examine the effect of church tax on the church membership decision using Finnish data. We present both descriptive statistics from an opting-out website and econometric evidence exploiting the panel structure of a large individual-level data set. Our descriptive analysis shows that opting out is concentrated towards the last days of the year, i.e., the last chance to avoid paying church tax for the entire coming year. Our econometric evidence suggests that the average effect of tax incentives for the whole population is both statistically and economically significant. A 1 standard deviation increase in church tax leads to between 0.5 and 1 percentage point decline in the likelihood of church membership. In addition, we find that church membership dropped substantially when a law change made opting out significantly easier. This finding suggests that transaction costs play an important role in the membership decision.

Keywords

Church tax Church membership Transaction cost 

JEL Classification

H24 H31 Z12 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Saku Aura, Pierre-André Chiappori, Kristiina Huttunen, Pekka Ilmakunnas, Mikael Lindahl, Daniele Paserman, Tuomas Pekkarinen, Otto Toivanen, Roope Uusitalo, and the seminar participants for their helpful comments. We are also indebted to Jori Mäntysalo and his colleagues at Free Thinkers’ Union of Finland for their generous data provision and assistance. Lyytikäinen gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation. Santavirta gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation and Eemil Aaltonen Foundation.

Supplementary material

148_2012_431_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (44 kb)
(PDF 43.5 KB)

References

  1. Bar-El R, García-Muñoz T, Neuman S, Tobol Y (2012) The evolution of secularization: cultural transmission, religion and fertility-theory, simulations and evidence. J Popul Econ. doi: 10.1007/s00148-011-0401-9 Google Scholar
  2. Deheija R, DeLeire T, and Luttmer E (2007) Insuring consumption and happiness through religious organizations. J Public Econ 91:259–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Francis LJ, Katz YJ (eds.) (2000) Joining and leaving religion: research perspectives. Leominster: GracewingGoogle Scholar
  4. Gruber J (2005) Religious market structure, religious participation, and outcomes: is religion good for you? Adv Econ Analysis Policy 5(1):Article 5Google Scholar
  5. Gruber J (2004) Pay or pray? The impact of charitable subsidies on religious attendance. J Public Econ 88(12):2635–2655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gruber J, Hungerman DM (2007) Faith-based charity and crowd out during the great depression. J Public Econ 91:1043–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gruber J, Hungerman DM (2008) The church versus the mall: what happens when religion faces increased secular competition? Quart J Econ 123:831–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heino H, Salonen H, Rusama J, Ahonen R (1997) Suomen evankelis-luterilainen kirkko vuosina 1992–1995. (Engl. The Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland between years 1992–1995). Kirkon tutkimuskeskus. TampereGoogle Scholar
  9. Hungerman DM (2005) Are church and state substitutes? Evidence from the 1996 welfare reform. J Public Econ 89:2245–2267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Iannaccone L (1998) Introduction to economics of religion. J Econ Lit 36:1465–1495Google Scholar
  11. Lumijärvi J (1998) Miksi kuulua kirkkoon? Espoolaisten kirkkoon situotuminen1990-luvulla. (Engl. Why belong to church? The commitment to church among people in Espoo county, Finland) Publications of the Department of Practical Theology, University of Helsinki, No. 91Google Scholar
  12. Madrian BC, Shea DF (2001) The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quart J Econ 116:1149–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Richter P, Francis LJ (1998) Gone but not forgotten: church leaving and returning. Dartman, Longman & Todd: LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Government Institute for Economic Research (VATT)HelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Spatial Economics Research CentreLondon School of EconomicsLondonUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI)Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations