Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Household allocation decisions and child health: can behavioral responses to vitamin A supplementation programs explain heterogeneous effects?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Population Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological research predicts that giving children vitamin A supplements will significantly reduce mortality from diarrheal and respiratory infections, but evaluations of supplementation programs in the field have produced a wide range of estimated mortality effects. In this paper, I explain these differences by differential household behavioral responses to programs. I find evidence that the mortality effect varies by observable determinants of household allocation to children. Additionally, I find that households improve malaria prevention for children that receive vitamin A supplements and that this effect varies by the same household allocation determinants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Analysis of the bargaining discussed in the background section above is still possible in this general model. It is assumed that the children of interest are too young to take control of their own bargaining and thus the bargaining over allocation to children analyzed here is between parents. Mother’s bargaining power is incorporated into determinants of a child’s weight in the household decision-making process (θ in the model).

  2. This method of construction means that estimating deviations from mean household vitamin A status and mean household mortality will require observations for three or more living children in the household within the age range being analyzed. Since this is not feasible, I cannot perform a household fixed effects analysis for the mortality analysis. I can use household fixed effects for the analysis of bed net provision, because in this analysis I only examine living children and thus no imputation of vitamin A status is necessary.

References

  • Alderman H, Chiappori PA, Haddad L, Hoddinott J, Kanbur R (1995) Unitary versus collective models of the household: is it time to shift the burden of proof? World Bank Res Obs 10(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton G, Martorell R, Aronson KA, Edmonston B, McCabe G, Ross AC, Harvey B (1993) Vitamin A supplementation and child morbidity and mortality in developing countries. SCN State-of-the-Art Nutrition Policy Discussion Paper No. 13

  • Becker G (2007) Health as human capital: synthesis and extensions. Oxf Econ Pap 59(3):379–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker G, Lewis HG (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ 81:279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman JR (1990) The action of human resources and poverty on one another: what we have yet to learn. Living Standards Measurement Study Working Paper No. 74

  • Behrman JR, Deolalikar A (1988) Health and nutrition. In: Chenery H, Srinivasan TN (eds) Handbook of development economics, vol 1. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 631–711

  • Behrman JR, Pollak R, Taubman P (1982) Parental preferences and provision for progeny. J Polit Econ 90(1):52–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishai D, Kumar KCS, Waters H, Koenig M, Katz J, Khatry SK, West K (2005) The impact of vitamin A supplementation on mortality inequalities among children in Nepal. Health Policy Plan 20(1):60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow WH, Philipson TJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1999) Longevity complementarities under competing risks. Am Econ Rev 89(5):1358–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad L, Hoddinott J, Alderman H (1997) Intrahousehold resources and allocation in developing countries. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouyate B, Some F, Jahn A, Coulibaly B, Eriksen J, Sauerborn R, Gustafsson L, Tomson G, Becher H, Mueller O (2008) Process and effects of a community intervention on malaria in rural burkina faso: randomized controlled trial. Malar J 7(1):50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg S, Pollak R, Wales T (1997) Do husbands and wives pool their resource? evidence from the united kingdom child benefit. J Hum Resour 32(3):463–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster E (2007) HIV and sexual behavior change: why not Africa? NBER Working Paper Number 13049

  • Phillips-Howard PA, ter Kuile FO, Nahlen BL, Alaii JA, Gimnig JE, Kolczak MS, Terlouw DJ, Kariuki SK, Shi YP, Kachur SP, Hightower AW, Vulule JM, Hawley WA (2003) The efficacy of permethrin-treated bed nets on child mortality and morbidity in Western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg 68(Suppl 4):23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Quisumbing A, Maluccio J (1999) Intra-household allocation and gender relations: new empirical evidence. IFPRI, Washington, DC Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Semba RD (1998) The role of vitamin A and related retinoids in immune function. Nutr Rev 56(1):S38–S48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semba RD (1999) Vitamin A and immunity to viral, bacterial and protozoan infections. Proc Nutr Soc 58(3):719–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Stansfield SK, Pierre-Louis M, Lerebours G, Augustin A (1993) Vitamin A supplementation and increased prevalence of childhood diarrhea and acute respiratory infections. Lancet 341(8871):578–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephensen CB (2001) Vitamin A, infection, and immune function. Annu Rev Nutr 21:167–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss J, Thomas D (1995) Human resources: empirical modeling of household and family decisions. In: Behrman JR, Srinivasan TN (eds) Handbook of development economics vol 3A. North Holland, Amsterdam pp 1883–2023

  • Thapa S, Choe MK, Retherford RD (2005) Effects of vitamin A supplementation on child mortality: evidence from Nepal’s 2001 demographic and health survey. Trop Med Int Health 10(8):782–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas D (1990) Intrahousehold resource allocation: an inferential approach. J Hum Resour 25(4):635–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas D (2000) Comments on intrahousehold allocations. J Afr Econ 9(1):144–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas D, Contreas D, Frankenberg E (2002) Distribution of power within the household and child health. UCLA, Los Angeles Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Villamor E, Fawzi W (2000) Vitamin A supplementation: implications for morbidity and mortality in children. J Infect Dis 182(S1):S122–S133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villamor E, Fawzi W (2005) Effects of vitamin A supplementation on immune responses and correlation with clinical outcomes. Clin Microbiol Rev 18(3):446–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2004) Vitamin A at a glance. At a glance series. World Bank Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Robert Kaestner, Darren Lubotsky, Lorens Helmchen, the participants at the IGPA Health Economics and Health Policy Seminar, and two anonymous referees for their comments and discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Yarnoff.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Junsen Zhang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yarnoff, B. Household allocation decisions and child health: can behavioral responses to vitamin A supplementation programs explain heterogeneous effects?. J Popul Econ 24, 657–680 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-010-0333-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-010-0333-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation