Abstract
A reassessment of Gibrat’s Law in the context of country size is carried out in this paper. In addition, how similarly population is distributed in cities and countries is analyzed from a temporal perspective. Although evidence of Gibrat’s Law is found, it is weaker than that previously established in Rose (J Money Credit Bank 38(8):2225–2246, 2006). This is due to the methodology applied and is especially appreciable in very small countries. Nonetheless, we observe that the population growth process in countries is similar to that of cities. As a result, the similarities between how the population is distributed in these two geographical categories have increased over time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alesina A, Spaolare E, Waczierg R (2005) Trade, growth and the size of countries. In: Aghion P, Durlauf SN (eds) Handbook of economic growth 1B. North-Holland Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 1499–1542
Anderson G, Ge Y (2005) The size distribution of Chinese cities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 35(6):756–776
Banerjee A, Massimiliano M, Osbat C (2005) Testing for PPP: should we use panel methods? Empir Econ 30(1):77–91
Black D, Henderson HV (2003) Urban evolution in the USA. J Econ Geogr 3(4):343–372
Bosker EM, Brakman S, Garretsen H, Schramm M (2008) A century of shocks: the evolution of the German city size distribution 1925–1999. Reg Sci Urban Econ 38(4):330–347
Cheshire PC, Magrini S (2006) Population growth in European cities: weather matters—but only nationally. Reg Stud 40(1):23–37
Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Financ 20(2):249–272
Clark JS, Stabler JC (1991) Gibrat’s law and the growth of Canadian cities. Urban Stud 28(4):635–639
Córdoba JC (2008) A generalized Gibrat’s Law for cities. Int Econ Rev 49(4):1463–1468
Davis DR, Weinstein DE (2002) Bones, bombs, and break points: the geography of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 92(5):1269–1289
Di Guilmi C, Gaffeo E, Gallegati M (2003) Power law scaling in the world income distribution. Econ Bull 15(6):1–7
Eaton J, Eckstein Z (1997) Cities and growth: theory and evidence from France and Japan. Reg Sci Urban Econ 27(4–5):443–474
Eeckhout J (2004) Gibrat’s law for (all) cities. Am Econ Rev 94(5):1429–1451
Eeckhout J (2009) Gibrat’s Law for (all) Cities: reply. Am Econ Rev (in press)
Ehrlich I, Lui F (1997) The problem of population and growth: a review of the literature from malthus to contemporary models of endogenous population and endogenous growth. J Econ Dyn Control 21(1):205–242
Furceri D (2008) Zipf’s Law and world income distribution. Appl Econ Lett 15(12):921–923
Gabaix X (1999) Zipf’s law for cities: an explanation. Q J Econ 114(3):739–767
Gabaix X, Iaonnides YM (2004) The evolution of city size distributions. In: Henderson JV, Thisse, JF (eds) Handbook of urban and regional economics 4A. North-Holland Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 2341–2378
Gabaix X, Ibragimov R (2007) Rank-1/2: a simple way to improve OLS estimation of tail exponents. NBER technical working paper no 342
Gibrat R (1931) Les inégalités économiques. Librairie du Recueil Sirey, Paris
Guérin-Pace F (1995) Rank-Size distribution and the process of urban growth. Urban Stud 32(3):551–562
Henderson JV, Wang HG (2007) Urbanization and city growth: the role of institutions. Reg Sci Urban Econ 37(3):283–313
Im K, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115(1):53–74
Ioannides YM, Overman HG (2003) Zipf’s law for cities: an empirical examination. Reg Sci Urban Econ 33(2):127–137
Jaeger K, Kuhle W (2009) The optimum growth rate for population reconsidered. J Popul Econ 22(1):23–41
Lanaspa L, Pueyo F, Sanz F (2003) The evolution of Spanish urban structure during the twentieth century. Urban Stud 40(3):567–580
Ng S, Perron P (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69(6):1519–1554
Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo working paper series no 1229
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312
Petrakos GP, Mardakis P, Caraveli H (2000) Recent developments in the Greek system of urban centres. Environ Plann B Plann Des 27(2):169–181
Quah DT (1993) Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. Eur Econ Rev 37(2–3):426–434
Resende M (2004) Gibrat’s law and the growth of cities in Brazil: a panel data investigation. Urban Stud 41(8):1537–1549
Rose AK (2006) Cities and countries. J Money Credit Bank 38(8):2225–2246
Soo KT (2005) Zipf’s law for cities: a cross-country investigation. Reg Sci Urban Econ 35(3):239–263
Soo KT (2007) Zipf’s law and urban growth in malaysia. Urban Stud 44(1):1–14
Zipf GK (1949) Human behaviour and the principle of least effort: an introduction to human ecology. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Junsen Zhang
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
González-Val, R., Sanso-Navarro, M. Gibrat’s law for countries. J Popul Econ 23, 1371–1389 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0246-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0246-7