Skip to main content

Does female participation affect the sharing rule?

Abstract

I give an empirical answer to whether the sharing patterns of household consumption of participating and nonparticipating wives differ. I use the basic collective model conditioned on female participation to identify the sharing patterns. Using Spanish data, I test the model assumptions and I find significant differences. Nonparticipating wives get larger transfers from their husbands than participating wives. However, while participating wives with at least an equal total share keep a part of their increase in wages for their own consumption, nonparticipating wives cannot benefit from having better labor opportunities. These results complement evidence about intrahousehold distribution of home time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bloemen HG (2004) An empirical model of collective household labour supply with nonparticipation. Tinbergen Institute discussion papers 04-010/3. Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Chiappori PA, Magnac T, Meghir C (2007) Collective labor supply: heterogeneity and nonparticipation. Rev Econ Stud 74(2):417–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon F, Browning M, Chiappori PA (2006) Efficient intra-household allocations and distribution factors: implications and identification. Working paper 2006-02. Centre for Applied Microeconometrics, University of Copenhagen

  • Browning M, Chiappori PA (1998) Efficient intra-household allocations: a general characterization and empirical test. Econometrica 66(6):1241–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning M, Gørtz M (2007) Spending time and money within the household. Mimeo. University of Oxford and AKF, Institute of Local Government Studies, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning M, Meghir C (1991) The effects of male and female labor supply on commodity demands. Econometrica 59(4):925–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning M, Bourguignon F, Chiappori PA, Lechene V (1994) Income and outcomes: a structural model of intrahousehold allocation. J Polit Econ 102(6):1067–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning M, Chiappori PA, Lewbel A (2006) Estimating consumption economies of scale, adult equivalence scales, and household bargaining power. Economics series working papers 289, Department of Economics, University of Oxford

  • Carrasco R, Zamora B (2007) The causal effect of female labour participation on household consumption. Evidence from Spanish data. Mimeo. University Jaume I, Castellón

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori PA (1988) Rational household labor supply. Econometrica 56(1):63–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori PA (1992) Collective labor supply and welfare. J Polit Econ 100(3):437–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton A, Ruiz-Castillo J, Thomas D (1989) The influence of household composition on household expenditure: theory and spanish evidence. J Polit Econ 97(1):179–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donni O (2003) Collective household labor supply: nonparticipation and income taxation. J Public Econ 87(5–6):1179–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donni O (2007) Collective female labor supply: theory and application. Econ J 117(516):94–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez C, Sevilla-Sanz A (2006) Social norms and household time allocation. Economics series working papers 291, Department of Economics, University of Oxford

  • Hourriez JM (2005) Estimation of a collective model of labor supply with female nonparticipation. Mimeo. CREST-INSEE, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Laat JJ, Sevilla-Sanz A (2007) Working women, men’s home time and lowest low fertility. Economics series working papers 308, Department of Economics, University of Oxford

  • Lee DH, Schaninger CM (2003) Attitudinal and consumption differences among traditional and nontraditional childless couple household. J Consum Behav 2(3):248–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS (1983) Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy MB (1990) The Empirical content of nash-bargained household behavior. J Hum Resour 25(4):561–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meghir C, Robin JM (1992) Frecuency of purchase and the estimation of demand systems. J Econom 53:53–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña D, Ruiz-Castillo J (1998) Estimating food and drinks household expenditures in the presence of bulk purchases. J Bus Econ Statist 16(3):292–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaninger CM, Putrevu S (2006) Dual spousal work involvement: an alternative method to classify household/families. Acad Mark Sci Rev 2006(8):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 1st edn. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernarda Zamora.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Deborah Cobb-Clark

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zamora, B. Does female participation affect the sharing rule?. J Popul Econ 24, 47–83 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-008-0208-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-008-0208-5

Keywords

  • Collective model
  • Sharing rule
  • Female participation

JEL Classification

  • D11
  • J22