Skip to main content

Sibling similarities and economic inequality in the US

Abstract

I use a new methodological approach and larger US samples than previous studies and estimate that the sibling correlation across a range of economic outcomes is around 0.5. This suggests that half of economic inequality in the US can be attributed to family and community influences. A comparison with noneconomic outcomes suggests that individual choices rather than a simple mechanical relationship governs the intergenerational transmission of income. A decomposition of the sibling correlation suggests that the acquisition of human capital is an important channel through which family background affects future success but that noncognitive factors also play a role.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The assumption that a i and u ij are uncorrelated is purely for analytical convenience and allows one, conceptually, to divide the permanent component into a part that is perfectly correlated among siblings and a part that is perfectly uncorrelated among siblings. For the assumption that a i and v ijt are uncorrelated, I find (as did Solon et al. 1991) that there is little or no cross-sectional correlation in the transitory component.

  2. 2.

    Allowing for serial correlation in the transitory component has little effect on the results. Readers who are interested in a comparison of estimators for this case may wish to consult Mazumder (2004), which is an earlier version of this paper.

  3. 3.

    Solon et al. (1991) implicitly have a restriction of an 8-year sibling age difference as the cohorts must be born between 1951 and 1958. Similarly, Altonji and Dunn (1991) use cohorts born between 1942 and 1952 who, in practice, are observed no more than eight times when they are at least 24 years old making it relatively rare to observe siblings spaced more than 8 years apart. In principle, (Björklund et al. 2002) may observe more widely spaced siblings; however, they do not report the age distribution within families.

References

  1. Altonji JG, Dunn TA (1991) Relationships among the family incomes and labor market outcomes of relatives. In: Ehrenberg RG (ed) Research in labor economics, vol 12. JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp 269–310

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altonji JG, Dunn TA (2000) An intergenerational model of wages, hours and earnings. J Hum Resour 35(2):221–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashenfelter O, Zimmerman D (1997) Estimates of the returns to schooling from sibling data: fathers, sons and brothers. Rev Econ Stat 79(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Björklund A, Eriksson T, Jantti M, Raaum O, Osterbacka E (2002). Brother correlations in earnings in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden compared to the United States. J Popul Econ 15(4):757–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Björklund A, Jantti M, Solon G (2005) Influences of nature and nurture on earnings variation. In: Bowles S, Gintis H, Osbourne-Groves M (eds) Unequal chances: family background and economic success. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 145–164

    Google Scholar 

  6. Case AC, Katz LF (1991) The company you keep: the effects of family and neighborhood on disadvantaged youths. NBER Working Paper 3705

  7. Chadwick L, Solon G (2002) Intergenerational income mobility among daughters. Am Econ Rev 92(1):335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Corak M (2006) Do poor children become poor adults? Lessons for public policy from a cross country comparison of generational earnings mobility. Res Econ Inequal 13 (1):143–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Corcoran M, Jencks C, Olneck M (1976) The effects of family background on earnings. Am Econ Rev 66(2):430–435

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duncan GJ, Boisjoly J, Harris KM (2001) Sibling, peer, neighbor, and schoolmate correlations as indicators of the importance of context for adolescent development. Demography 38(3):437–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunifon R, Duncan GJ, Brooks-Gunn J (2001) As ye sweep, so shall ye reap. Am Econ Rev 91(2):150–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heckman JJ, Rubinstein Y (2001) The importance of noncognitive skills: lessons from the GED testing program. Am Econ Rev 91(2):145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee KE, Klein B, Klein R (2003) Familial aggregation of components of the multiple metabolic syndrome in the Framingham Heart and Offspring Cohorts: genetic analysis workshop problem 1. BMC Genet 4(Suppl 1):S94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Loehlin JC, Rowe DC (1992) Genes, environment, and personality. In: Chapara G, Van Heck GL (eds) Modern personality psychology: critical reviews and new directions. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mazumder B (2004) Sibling similarities, differences and economic inequality. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper 2004–13

  16. Mazumder B (2005) Fortunate sons: new estimates of intergenerational mobility in the U.S. using social security earnings data. Rev Econ Stat 87(2):235–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer K, Hill WG (1991) Approximation of sampling variances and confidence intervals for maximum likelihood estimates of variance components. J Anim Breed Genet 109:264–280

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oettinger GS (1999) Does the sibling correlation in economic status vary across family and sibling pair. Manuscript, University of Texas

  19. Osbourne M (2000) The power of personality: labor market rewards and transmission of earnings. Manuscript, University of Massachusetts

  20. Osbourne-Groves M (2005) Personality and the intergenerational transmission of earnings. In: Bowles S, Gintis H, Osbourne-Groves M (eds) Unequal chances: family background and economic success. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rauum O, Salvanes KG, Sørensen EØ (2006) The neighborhood is not what it used to be. Econ J 116(1):200–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch C (1992) Variance components. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Solon G (1992) Intergenerational income mobility in the United States. Am Econ Rev 82(3):393–408

    Google Scholar 

  24. Solon G (1999) Intergenerational mobility in the labor market. In: Ashenfalter OC, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, North Holland

    Google Scholar 

  25. Solon G, Corcoran M, Gordon R, Laren D (1991) A longitudinal analysis of sibling correlations in economic status. J Hum Resour 26(3):509–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Solon G, Page ME, Duncan GJ (2000) Correlations between neighboring children in their subsequent educational attainment. Rev Econ Stat 82(3):383–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Visscher PM (1998) On the sampling variance of intraclass correlations and genetic correlations. Genetics 149(3):1605–1614

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I thank David I. Levine, Gary Solon, Dan Sullivan, Kristin Butcher, and three anonymous referees for helpful comments. I also greatly appreciate the outstanding research assistance provided by Sara Christopher. The views expressed here do not represent the views of the Federal Reserve System.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhashkar Mazumder.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Christian Dustmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazumder, B. Sibling similarities and economic inequality in the US. J Popul Econ 21, 685–701 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0127-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sibling correlation
  • Intergenerational mobility

JEL Classification

  • J0
  • D3
  • J62