Abstract
We study the design of pension schemes when fertility is endogenous and parents differ in ability to raise children. Pay-as-you-go schemes require, under perfect information, a marginal subsidy on fertility to correct for the externality they create, equal pensions, and contributions that increase or decrease with the number of children. Under asymmetric information, incentive-related distortions supplement the Pigouvian subsidy. These require an additional subsidy or an offsetting tax depending on whether the redistribution is towards people with more or with less children. In the former case, pensions are decreasing in the number of children; otherwise, they are increasing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abio G, Mahieu G, Patxot C (2004) On the optimality of PAYG pension systems in an endogenous fertility setting. J Pension Econ Finance 3(1):35–62
Cigno A, Luporini A, Pettini A (2004) Hidden information problems in the design of family allowance. J Popul Econ 17(4):645–655
Cremer H, Gahvari F, Pestieau P (2003) Stochastic fertility, moral hazard, and the design of pay-as-you-go pension plans. Paper presented at CESifo Venice Summer Institute
Cremer H, Gahvari F, Pestieau P (2006) Pensions with endogenous and stochastic fertility. J Public Econ (in press)
Fenge R, Meier V (2005) Pensions and fertility incentives. Can J Econ 38(1):28–48
Samuelson, PA (1958) An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. J Polit Econ 66(6):467–482
Sinn HW (2004) The pay-as-you-go pension system as fertility insurance and an enforcement device. J Public Econ 88(7–8):1335–1357
van Groezen B, Leers T, Meijdam L (2003) Social security and endogenous fertility: pensions and child allowances as Siamese twins. J Public Econ 87(2):233–251
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Alessandro Cigno
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cremer, H., Gahvari, F. & Pestieau, P. Pensions with heterogenous individuals and endogenous fertility. J Popul Econ 21, 961–981 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0114-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0114-7