Skip to main content

The emigration of immigrants, return vs onward migration: evidence from Sweden

Abstract

This study analyzes emigration propensities for natives and immigrants delineating among immigrant emigrants between return and onward migration. Results indicate that emigrants are positively selected in terms of upper education. Well-educated immigrants have a higher probability of leaving for third-country destinations than returning to countries of origin. Predicted age–income profiles for immigrants show that return migrants have higher adjusted mean income levels than non-emigrants up to the age of 40. Onward migrants have lower predicted income levels across the age distribution due to this group’s composition and relatively low employment levels in Sweden. Separate estimations by region of origin indicate that within each group, onward migrants are more positively selected then return migrants in terms of income.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Notes

  1. Hammarstedt (2004) analyzes emigration of immigrants from Sweden, with a separate analysis for return and onward migrants. This study focuses on the influence of unemployment and welfare pick-up on emigration probabilities. DaVanzo (1976), (1983) studies return and onward migration between US counties. See also Constant and Zimmermann (2003) for a study on repeat migration.

  2. Traditional panel estimation techniques are not used, as a sample of non-emigrants is compared to the full population of emigrants for each available year, implying non-trivial weighting problems.

  3. An equal or higher probability for Asian, African, and East European emigrants to migrate to third-country destinations is found when younger age groups are included in estimation (16+). Note that emigration propensities vary by region of origin. Information from Statistics Sweden (SCB) for the year 2000 indicate that 0.2% of natives emigrate, 1.9% of the Nordic born, 1.2% of Europeans, 1.6% of Africans, 3.9% of North Americans, 1.3% of South Americans, and 1.0% of Asians.

  4. All models were reestimated, including individuals with no information registered on attained educational levels. In these estimations, a separate categorical variable was created for those with missing education. Reported results are robust to the inclusion of these individuals. Missing information on education was found to be associated with a higher probability of emigration.

  5. As a check of robustness, linear probability models of emigration are reestimated for immigrants, including a full set of dummy variables indicating year of immigration with no notable change in results. Results are available upon request.

  6. Linear probability models on emigration were run separately for each available year, 1991–2000. The only notable differences in results were the following: The probability of emigrating for immigrant Ph.D. degree holders was lower in comparison to primary-school-educated immigrants but still positive and significant for the earlier period (1991–1994). Duration of residence was found to have a stronger negative impact on emigration probabilities in the early 1990s. Finally, immigrants from other Nordic countries were found to have a higher probability of emigrating from Sweden, relative to West Europeans during 1991–1992. Results for natives were quantitatively similar for each respective year.

  7. Due to the nature of the data, estimations in the paper are unable to specifically control for unobserved ability. Reagan and Olsen (2000) find a positive effect on return migration for college graduates but no separate affect for ability, as measured by the Armed Forces Qualifying Test.

  8. Income regressions by region of origin are not shown but are available from author by request. Duration of residence is found to be positively associated with income for all regions, with the exception of West Europeans emigrants (both return and onward migrants) and Nordic onward emigrants.

  9. Results for women, shown in Figs. A16 and A17, indicate that income levels for native emigrants surpass that of native non-emigrants after the age of 30. For immigrant women, average adjusted incomes for employed onward migrants surpass that of return migrants across the age distribution and surpass that of non-emigrants after the age of 30. Return migrants have similar or slightly lower incomes than non-emigrant (fully employed) immigrant women.

References

  • Aguilar R, Gustafsson B (1994) Immigrants in Sweden’s labour market during the 1980s. Scand Econ His Rev 3:139–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson D, Dahlgren H, Hagsten E (2000) Internationell rörlighet bland högskoleutbildade. Beskrivningar av utvandring och invandring i Sverige under 1990-talet. Regeringskansliet, Utbildningsdepartementet 1–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Arai M, Regnér H, Schröder L (2000a) Invandrare på den svenska arbetsmarknaden. DS 2000:69

    Google Scholar 

  • Arai M, Schröder L, Vilhelmsson R (2000b) En svartvit arbetsmarknad. Report to the expert group in public economics (ESO). DS 2000:47

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevelander P, Skyt Nielsen H (1999) Declining employment assimilation of immigrants in Sweden: observed or unobserved characteristics? Discussion paper 2132, Centre for Economic Policy Research

  • Borjas G (1985) Assimilation, changes in cohort quality, and the earnings of immigrants. J Labor Econ 3(4):463–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas G (1987) Self-selection and the earnings of immigrants. Am Econ Rev 77:531–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas G (1989) Immigrant and emigrant earnings: a longitudinal study. Econ Inq 27:21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas G (1999) The economic analysis of immigration. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3. pp 1697–1760

  • Borjas G (2000) The economic progress of immigrants. In: Borjas G (ed) Issues in the economics of immigration. University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas G, Bratsberg B (1996) Who leaves? The out-migration of the foreign-born. Rev Econ Stat 78(1):165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick B (1978) The effect of Americanization on the earnings of foreign-born men. J Polit Econ 86:897–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constant A, Massey DS (2003) Self-selection, earnings, and out-migration: a longitudinal study of immigrants to Germany. J Popul Econ 16(4):631–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constant A, Zimmermann KF (2003) The dynamics of repeat migration: a Markov chain analysis. IZA Discussion papers, no. 885

  • DaVanzo J (1976) Differences between return and nonreturn migration: an econometric analysis. Int Migr Rev 10(1):13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DaVanzo J (1983) Repeat migration in the United States: who moves back and who moves on? Rev Econ Stat 65:552–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devortez D, Ituralde C (2000) Probability of staying in Canada, Vancouver centre of excellence. Working paper 00-06. RIIM

  • Djajic S, Milbourne R (1988) A general equilibrium model of guest-worker migration. J Int Econ 25:335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duleep HO (1994) Social security and the emigration of immigrants. Social Secur Bull 57:37–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann C (1993) Earnings adjustment of temporary migrants. J Popul Econ 6:153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann C (1996a) An economic analysis of return migration. Discussion paper, No. 96-02, University College of London and CEPR, London

  • Dustmann C (1996b) Return migration. The European experience. Econ Policy 22:215–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann C (2000) Temporary migration and economic assimilation. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 186

  • Dustmann C (2001) Return migration wage differentials and the optimal migration duration. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 264

  • Dustmann C (2003) Return migration, wage differentials, and the optimal migration duration. Eur Econ Rev 47:353–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edin P-A, Åslund O (2001) Invandrare på 1990-talets arbetsmarknad. Research paper 7, IFAU

  • Edin P-A, Lalonde RJ, Åslund O (2000) Emigration of immigrants and measures of immigrant assimilation: evidence from Sweden. Swed Econ Policy Rev 7:163–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekberg J (1991) Vad hände sedan? En studie av utrikes födda på arbetsmarknaden. ACTA Wexionesia 2, Economy and politics 3, Växjö

  • Galor O, Stark O (1991) The probability of return migration, migrants’ work effort and migrants’ performance. J Dev Econ 35(2):399–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammarstedt M (2004) Återutvandring från Sverige 1995–1999. Ekon Debatt 2004:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckmann JJ, Honoré BE (1990) The empirical content of the Roy Model. Econometrica 58(5):1121–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks JR (1932) The theory of wages. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JK (1987) Immigrant decisions concerning duration of stay and migratory frequency. J Dev Econ 25:221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu WY (2000) Immigrant earnings assimilation: estimates from longitudinal data. Am Econ Rev 90(2):368–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso G, Rosenzweig MR (1982) Estimating the emigration rates of legal immigrants using administrative and survey data: the 1971 cohort of immigrants to the United States. Demography 19:279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinthäll M (1998) Patterns of return migration from Sweden 1970–1993. Department of Economic History, Lund University

  • Klinthäll M (1999) Homeward bound: return migration from Sweden to Germany, Greece, Italy and the United States during the period 1968–1993. Department of Economic History, Lund University

  • Klinthäll M (2000) Are return migrants marginalized? Department of Economic History, Lund University

  • Klinthäll M (2003) Return migration from Sweden to Chile. What happened after Pinochet? Lund Stud Econ Hist 2003:21

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalonde RJ, Topel RH (1992) The assimilation of immigrants in the U.S. labor market. In: Borjas G (ed) Issues in the economics of immigration. University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • le Grand C, Szulkin R (2000) Permanent disadvantage or gradual integration: explaining the immigrant-native earnings gap in Sweden. SOFI Working Paper series 2000, No. 7

  • Lindstrom DP, Massey DS (1994) Selective emigration, cohort quality and models of immigrant assimilation. Soc Sci Res 23:315–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longva P (2001) Out-migration of immigrants: implications for assimilation analysis. Memorandum 4. Department of Economics, University of Oslo

  • Longva P, Raaum O (2003) Earnings assimilation of immigrants in Norway—a reappraisal. J Popul Econ 16:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubotsky D (2000) Chutes or ladders? A longitudinal analysis of immigrant earnings (mimeo). Princeton University

  • Lundborg P (2000) Vilka förlorade jobbet under 1990-talet? In: Johan Fritzell (ed) Välfärdens förutsättningar. Arbetsmarknad, demografi och segregation. SOU 2000:37

  • Nekby L (2003) Empirical studies on health insurance, employment of immigrants and the gender wage gap. Doctoral dissertation 2003:2, Department of Economics, Stockholm University

  • Österberg T (2000) Economic perspectives on immigrants and intergenerational transmissions. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Economics, Handelshögskolan, Göteborg University

  • Pedersen PJ, Røed M, Schröder L (2001) Utvandringen från de skandinaviska välfärdstaterna. Chapter in SNS report: Den offentliga sektorns dimensionering och styrning 1–19

  • Ramos FA (1992) Out-migration and return migration of Puerto Ricans. In: Borjas G, Freeman R (eds) Immigration and the work force: economic consequences for the United States and source areas. University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid S (2002) Invandrarkvinnor och förvärvsdeltagande. Vilken roll spelar familjen? Umeå economic studies 588, Umeå University

  • Reagan PB, Olsen RJ (2000) You can go home again: evidence from longitudinal data. Demography 3(3):339–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røed M (2002a) The return to return migration. ISF paper 2002:006. The Institute for Social Research

  • Røed M (2002b) Premiums of migration abroad and upon return—a general model. ISF paper 2002:007. The Institute for Social Research

  • Rosholm M, Scott K, Husted L (2000) The times they are a-changin’. organizational change and immigrant employment opportunities in Scandinavia. Working paper 2000, No. 07. Centre for Labour Market and Social Research

  • Roy AD (1951) Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxf Econ Pap 3:135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder L (1996) Scandinavian skill migration in the 1980s. In: Wadensjö E (ed) The Nordic labour markets in the 1990s, vol II. Elsevier Science B. V.

  • Wadensjö E (1997) Invandrarkvinnornas arbetsmarknad. SOU 1997:137

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Mahmood Arai for helpful comments as well as to seminar participants at the Department of Economics, Stockholm University, the Institute for Labor Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU), and the Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI). The paper has greatly benefited from the comments of two anonymous referees. Finally, I wish to thank Finanspolitiska Forskningsinstitutet and the Jan Wallander Foundation and Tom Hedelius Foundation for research support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lena Nekby.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Klaus F. Zimmermann

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1 Linear probability model of return migration and onward migration, by region of origin: Nordic Countries, Western and Eastern Europea
Table A2 Linear probability model of return migration and onward migration, by region of origin: North and South Americaa
Table A3 Linear probability model of return migration and onward migration, by region of origin: Africa and Asiaa
Table A4 Income regressions (log average lagged income)a
Fig. A1
figure 12

Predicted age–income profile, native women

Fig. A2
figure 13

Predicted age–income profile, immigrant women

Fig. A3
figure 14

Unadjusted age-specific mean income, native mena

Fig. A4
figure 15

Unadjusted age-specific mean income, immigrant mena

Fig. A5
figure 16

Unadjusted age-specific mean income, native womena

Fig. A6
figure 17

Unadjusted age-specific mean income, immigrant womena

Fig. A7
figure 18

Predicted age–income profiles by region of origin, Nordic women

Fig. A8
figure 19

Predicted age–income profiles by region of origin, west European women

Fig. A9
figure 20

Predicted age–income profiles by region of origin, east European women

Fig. A10
figure 21

Predicted age–income profiles by region of origin, North American women

Fig. A11
figure 22

Predicted age–income profiles by region of origin, South American women

Fig. A12
figure 23

Predicted age-income profiles by region of origin, African women

Fig. A13
figure 24

Predicted age-income profiles by region of origin, Asian women

Fig. A14
figure 25

Predicted age–income profiles for fully employed, native men

Fig. A15
figure 26

Predicted age–income profiles for fully employed, foreign-born men

Fig. A16
figure 27

Predicted age–income profiles for fully employed, native women

Fig. A17
figure 28

Predicted age–income profiles for fully employed, immigrant women

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nekby, L. The emigration of immigrants, return vs onward migration: evidence from Sweden. J Popul Econ 19, 197–226 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0080-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0080-0

Keywords

  • Emigration
  • Return migration
  • Onward migration

JEL Classification

  • J61
  • J15