Abstract
In today’s age, we see the increasing influence of technology on people, which begs to raise the question: “Is society determined by technology?” Rising up within the constraints of each society, technology had its limitations, as it catered to the needs and interests of the masses. As society evolved, so did its requirements. We are at a stage where dependence on technology has gone through the roof with new innovations coming up in the sector, the rise of artificial intelligence, for instance. Technology has replaced the concept of being a mere tool and is creating/demanding space of its own. With advancements in various fields like robotics which churn out machines that can mimic human behaviour and are equipped with anthropomorphic features, it has become rather difficult to view them as mere commodities waiting for one’s (human master’s) command. Keeping this in view, the paper primarily focuses on the relationship between society and technology, with special emphasis on artificial intelligence, through an analysis of the films Ra One (Bollywood), Android Kunjappan (Mollywood), and Ironman 3 (Hollywood). Secondarily, an experimental study was carried out to know the perception of the Engineering students, the future technologists, who are the stakeholders of the 21st-century technological world, with an aim to know their perception of technology and bring an awareness of the limitations of technology and its role in the creation of utopian and dystopian world. Finally, the paper examines the consequence of technological determinism and autonomy from a colonial perspective and intends to bring preparedness among the students to perceive technology conscious of its limitation and bring harmony between society and technology that leads towards building a utopian world.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors declare that [the/all other] data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
References
Baudiment F G (2015) Sharing our humanity with robots: what does it mean to be human?. World Fut Rev. 6(4): 412–425 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276109116_Sharing_Our_Humanity_with_Robots_What_Does_It_Mean_To_Be_Human
Bimber B (1994). three faces of technological determinism. In: Marx, L., Smith, M. R. (Eds). Does technology drive history: The dilemma of technological determinism. MIT Press. USA, pp 79–100 https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262193474/does-technology-drive-history/
Edgerton D (2008). The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History Since 1900. Profile Books. London. https://wtf.tw/ref/edgerton.pdf
Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo Deus: A brief history of Tomorrow. Harper Collins Publishers, New York. https://readandlaugh.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/homo_deus_a_brief_history_of_tomorrow_pdf.pdf
Idier, Dominic. (2000). Science fiction and technology scenarios: comparing Asimov’s robots and Gibson’s cyberspace. Technol Soc. 22(2): 255–272 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222519827_Science_fiction_and_technology_scenarios_Comparing_Asimov%27s_robots_and_Gibson%27s_cyberspace
Lizut, Rafal A. (2016). On the relation between human and technology. stud gilson. 5(1): 95–108 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309547335_On_the_Relation_Between_Human_and_Technology
Marx, L., Smith, M. R. (1994). does technology drive history: the dilemma of technological determinism. In: Smith, M. R (Eds.) MIT press. USA. https://archive.org/details/doestechnologydr0000unse/mode/2up
Max lab cinemas (2019). Android Kunjappan Ver 5.25. India.
Pierce J (2019) Digital divide. Int Encycl Media Lit. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0052
Red chillies entertainment (2011). Ra One. India.
Richardson, Kathleen. (2016). Sex Robot Matters: Slavery, the Prostituted, and the Rights of Machines. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. 35(2): 46–53 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7484884
Spengler O (1932) Man and technics: a contribution to a philosophy of life. Arktos, UK. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.53913/mode/2up
Walt disney studios (2013). Ironman 3. USA.
Wyatt S (2008) Technological Determinism Is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism. In: Lynch M et al (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 165–180 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261947854_Technological_Determinism_is_Dead_Long_Live_Technological_Determinism
Curmudgeon Corner
Curmudgeon Corner is a short opinionated column on trends in technology, arts, science and society, commenting on issues of concern to the research community and wider society. Whilst the drive for super-human intelligence promotes potential benefits to wider society, it also raises deep concerns of existential risk, thereby highlighting the need for an ongoing conversation between technology and society. At the core of Curmudgeon concern is the question: What is it to be human in the age of the AI machine? -Editor.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A.P., Rukmini, S. Technology, the latent conqueror: an experimental study on the perception and awareness of technological determinism featuring select sci-fi films and AI literature. AI & Soc 39, 65–73 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01763-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01763-5