Skip to main content

Processing of grid-based design representations: a qualitative analysis of concurrent think-aloud protocols

Abstract

The squared paper or graphs are grid-based design representations used in engineering, industrial and craft design practices wherein designs are drawn over symmetrical grids. This paper reports grid-processing strategies undertaken by actors in a native craft practice, viz. Kashmiri carpet-weaving having three task contexts: (1) design, wherein designs are drawn on graph sheets and color scheme given by assigning practice-specific symbolic codes to the motifs by designers; (2) coding, wherein a cryptic script, called talim, is generated from these encoded graphs by talim-writers; and (3) weaving, wherein this script is read, decoded and communicated in an equally cryptic trade-language by weavers among their teams. 32 video-recorded think-aloud sessions were conducted with talim-writers to understand their graph-processing and resultant coding strategies. The observations and qualitative analysis of transcripts revealed highly situated strategies undertaken by experts keen on imbibing visuality of design embedded in the grids, in contrast to embodied strategies undertaken by less-experienced coders keen on processing grids’ structural features and getting overwhelmed by grid-clutter in the process. In this landscape, the findings revealed a negotiated nature of errors instead of being deviations from the underlying grid and thereby objectively assessable. The paper makes recommendations for CAD systems to include more of those grid features exploited by experts during their graph processing to facilitate designers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Data availability

The study being conducted in a sensitive conflict area, the data cannot be uploaded on public repositories.

References

  1. Bartram L (2011) The effect of colour and transparency on the perception of overlaid grids. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 17(12):1942–1948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bokil P (2012) Making grids flexible: a systematic approach to understand the behavior of grid. Proc Typography Day-2012: 1–7

  3. Bokil P, Ranade S (2009) Radial grid in graphic layout. Proc of Int Ass of Soc of Design Research (IASDR 09): 3263–3272

  4. Boshuizen HPA (2009) Teaching for expertise: Problem-based methods in medicine and other professional domains. In: Ericsson KA (ed) Development of professional expertise: toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511609817.021

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins P (1962) The origins of graph paper as an influence on architectural design. J Soc Archit Hist 21(4):159–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cross N (2006) Designerly ways of knowing. Springer-Verlag, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davis JW (1972) Unified drawing through the use of hybrid pictorial elements and grids. Leonardo 5:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eastman CM (1970) On the analysis of intuitive design processes. In: Moore GT (ed) Emerging methods in environmental design and planning. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 21–37

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fateh M, Kabir E (2018) Color reduction in hand-drawn Persian carpet cartoons before discretization using image segmentation and finding edgy regions. J AI Data Mining 6(1):47–58

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher T, Botticello J (2016) Machine-made lace, the spaces of skilled practices and the paradoxes of contemporary craft production. Cult Geogr. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474016680106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenfield PM (2000) Children, material culture, and weaving: Historical change and developmental change. In: Derevenski JS (ed) Children and material culture. Routledge, London, pp 72–86

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gross MD (1991) Grids in design and CAD. In Proceedings ACADIA 91: Reality and virtual reality, Los Angeles, pp 33–43

  13. Groth C (2016) Design and craft thinking analysed as embodied cognition. Form Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harlizius-Klück E (2017) Weaving as binary art and the algebra of patterns. Textile 15(2):176–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759756.2017.1298239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hutchinson P, Monaghan I, Morgan R (2015) A multidimensional analysis method of think aloud protocol data. In: Jones DL, Ding L, Churukian AD (eds) Physics education research conference (PERC). American Association of Physics Teachers, USA, pp 147–150

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kamel HM, Landay JA (2000) A study of blind drawing practice: creating graphical information without the visual channel. In Proc. of 4th intl conf. on assistive technologies (ASSETS ’00), pp 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/354324.354334

  18. Kaur GD (2019) Cognitivism or situated-distributed cognition? Assessing Kashmiri carpet weaving practice from the two theoretical paradigms. Rev Phil Psy 11:917–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-019-00455-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan FA (1993) Cognitive organization and work activity: a study of carpet weavers in Kashmir. Quar Newsl Lab Comp Hum Cog 15(2):48–53

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kaur GD (2018) Situated problem solving in Kashmiri carpet weaving practice. Cog Sys Res 49:83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Klein G (1998) Sources of power: how people make decisions. MIT Press, Massachussets

    Google Scholar 

  22. Koskinen A, Seitamaa-Hakkarainen P, Hakkarainen K (2015) Interaction and embodiment in craft teaching. Techne series 22(1): 59–72. https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/1253

  23. Lahti H, Seitamaa-Hakkarainen P, Kangas K, Härkki T, Hakkarainen K (2016) Textile teacher students’ collaborative design processes in a design studio setting. Art Des Commun High Educ 15(1):35–54. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.15.1.35_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lave J (1977) Cognitive consequences of traditional apprenticeship training West Africa. Anth and Edu Quart 8(3):177–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Lesgold A, Rubinson H, Feltovich P, Glaser R, Klopfer D, Wang Y (1988) Expertise in a complex skill: diagnosing X-ray pictures. In: Chi MTH, Glaser R, Farr MJ (eds) The nature of expertise. Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ, pp 311–342

    Google Scholar 

  27. Qi Li, Nakashima R, Yokosawa K (2018) Task-irrelevant spatial dividers facilitate counting and numerosity estimation. Sci Rep 8:15620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moeller K, Martignon L, Wessolowski S, Engel J, Nuerk HC (2011) Effects of finger counting on numerical development? The opposing views of neurocognition and mathematics. Front in Psy 2:1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Muller-Brockmann J (1981) Grid systems in graphic design: a visual communication manual for graphic designers, typographers and three dimensional designers. Niggli Verlag, Sulgen

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sabers DS, Cushing KS, Berliner DC (1991) Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensionality and immediacy. Amer Edu Res Jour 28(1):63–88. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312028001063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Samara T (2005) Making and breaking the grid: a graphic design layout workshop. Rockport Publications, Beverly

    Google Scholar 

  32. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen P, Hakkarainen KB (2001) Composition and construction in experts’ and novices’ weaving design. Des Stud 22:44–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(99)00038-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sinclair N, Pimm DJ (2015) Mathematics using multiple senses: developing finger gnosis with three- and four-year-olds in an era of multi-touch technology. Asia-Paci J Res 9(3):99–110

    Google Scholar 

  34. Siu NWC, Dilnot C (2001) The challenge of the codification of tacit knowledge in designing and making: a case study of CAD systems in the Hong Kong jewellery industry. Automation Construction. 10:701–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Stone M, Bartram L (2008) Alpha, contrast and the perception of visual metadata. In: Proc of 16th Color and Imaging Conference, Society for Imaging Science and Technology, pp 355–359

  36. Ste-marie D (2003) Expertise in sport judges and referees: Circumventing information processing limitations. In: Ericsson KA, Starkes JL (eds) Expert performance in sports: advances in research on sport expertise. US, Human Kinetics, pp 169–190

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wiggins MW, O’Hare D (2006) Expert and novice pilot perceptions of static in-flight images of weather. Inter J Avi Psy 13(2):173–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap1302_05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Williamson JH (1986) The grid: history, use and meaning. Des Issu 8(2):15–30

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wolff CE, Jarodzkal H, Bogert NVD, Boshuizen HPA (2016) Teacher vision: expert and novice teachers’ perception of problematic classroom management scenes. Instr Sci 44:243–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9367-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zevenbergen R (1997) Situated numerosity: mathematical saturation. In: Proceedings of ICPCET-1997: Good thinking, good practice: research perspectives on learning and work, Brisbane, Griffith University, pp 203–213

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the International Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in the Human Sciences (ICIRHS) at Laurentian University, Canada for providing me requisite research environment to conduct this research. I am further grateful to Homi Bhabha Fellowships Council, Mumbai for funding this work and Homi Bhabha Centre For Science Education (HBCSE), Mumbai (both in India) for providing me the research facilities during 2017–19. Part of data collection, partly funded, was done as Postdoctoral Associate at National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS), Bengaluru (India) during 2015–17. I am thankful to Abdul Rashid Bhat (Srinagar, India) for permitting me to reproduce the design extract in the paper. I am thankful to all the code writers who gave their time and participated in the think-aloud sessions reported in this paper and permitted me to reproduce their codes and pictures. Thanks are also due to an anonymous reviewer to an early version of this manuscript for referring me to the works of Ellen Harlizius-Kluck and Prof. Ken Friedman for making some of the papers available to me.

Funding

No external funding, except those listed in Acknowledgements.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gagan Deep Kaur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest with either of the institutes or funders listed in Acknowledgments.

Consent to participate and publication

Written consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaur, G.D. Processing of grid-based design representations: a qualitative analysis of concurrent think-aloud protocols. AI & Soc (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01281-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Grid
  • Design
  • Coding
  • Talim
  • Expertise
  • Kashmiri Carpet-Weaving