Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developing socially inspired robotics through the application of human analogy: capabilities and social practice

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Socially inspired robotics involves drawing on the observation and study of human social interactions to apply them to the design of sociable robots. As there is increasing expectation that robots may participate in social care and provide some relief for the increasing shortage of human care workers, social interaction with robots becomes of increasing importance. This paper demonstrates the potential of socially inspired robotics through the exploration of a case study of the interaction of a partially sighted social worker with a support worker. This is framed within the capability approach in which the interaction of a human and a sociable robot is understood as resulting in a collaborative capability which is grounded the relationship between the human and the robot rather than the autonomous capabilities of the robot. The implications of applying the case study as an analogy for human–robot interaction are expressed through a discussion of capabilities and social practice and policy. The study is attenuated by a discussion of the technical limits of robots and the extensive complexity of the social context in which it is envisaged sociable robots may be employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkire S (2005) Why the capability approach? J Hum Dev 6(1):115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M, Anderson SL (2010) Robot be good: a call for ethical autonomous robots. Sci Am 303:72–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlas Z (2019) When robots tell you what to do: sense of agency in human- and robot-guided actions. Conscious Cogn 75:102819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw JM, Hoffman RR, Johnson M, Woods DD (2013) The seven deadly myths of autonomous systems. IEEE Intell Syst 2013:54–61 (May/June)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal CL (2002) Designing sociable robots. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • BSI (2016) BS 8611—Robots and robotic devices: guide to the ethical design and application of robots and robotic systems (No. BS 8611:2016). BSI Standards Publication, ‎London

    Google Scholar 

  • Byagowi A Kopacek P (2010) Using natural human gait for a humanoid robot. 19th International Workshop on Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region—RAAD 2010 June 23–25, 2010 Budapest Hungary

  • Chen Y, Wu F, Shuai W, Chen X (2017) Robots serve humans in public places—Kejia robot as a shopping assistant. Int J Adv Robot Syst 2017:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh M (2008) “How i learned to love the robot” capabilities, information technologies and elderly care. In: Oosterlaken I, van den Hoven A (eds) The capability approach, technology and design, philosophy of engineering and technology, vol 5. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins H (2010) Tacit and explicit knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher D (2020) Robot Betrayal: a guide to the ethics of robot deception. Ethics Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-019-09520-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng E, Mutlu B, Mataric MJ (2019) Embodiment in socially interactive robots. Found Trends Robot 7(4):251–356. https://doi.org/10.1561/2300000056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Déniz O, Hernández M, Lorenzo J, CastrillÓn M (2007) An engineering approach to sociable robots. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 19(4):285–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528130701208174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK (2001) Interpretive Interactionism. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter Industries (2019) Raspberry Pi robot that reads emotions. https://www.dexterindustries.com/projects/raspberry-pi-robot-that-reads-emotions/ Accessed 3 Aug 2019

  • Economist (2019) Why the world’s first robot hotel was a disaster. https://www.economist.com/gulliver/2019/03/27/why-the-worlds-first-robot-hotel-was-a-disaster. Accessed 3 Aug 2019

  • Fellous J-M (2004) From human emotions to robot emotions. American Association for Artificial Intelligence. https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/2004/SS-04-02/SS04-02-008.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2019

  • Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42:143–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster ME (2019) Natural language generation for social robotics: opportunities and challenges. Phil Trans R Soc B 374:20180027. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier S (2011) From ants to robots and back: how robotics can contribute to the study of collective animal behavior. In: Meng Y, Jin Y (eds) Bio-inspired self-organizing robotic systems. Studies in computational intelligence, vol 355. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson B, MacLean K, Haddadi A, Croft E, Alcazar J (2013) Gestures from industry: intuitive human-robot communication from human observation. HRI 2013—Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, 349–356

  • Grifantini K (2008) The flight of dragonfly robots. MIT Technology, Cambridge (Review June 11 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall K (2019) Your kids will be glad a UK government-funded robot will be changing your nappy and not them. The register: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/10/28/uk_invests_in_care_robots_research/ Accessed Dec 29 2019

  • House of Parliament (2018) Robotics in social care Postnote 591 December 2018 Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London

  • Knight H (2014) How humans respond to robots. Building public policy through good design. Brookings Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosaka M (2013) Gait control for guide dog robot to walk and climb a step. In: Gaol F (ed) Recent progress in data engineering and internet technology. Lecture notes in electrical engineering, vol 156. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Landowska A (2019) Uncertainty in emotion recognition. J Inform Commun Ethics Soc 17(3):273–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride N, Hoffman R (2016) Bridging the ethical gap: from human principles to robot instructions. IEEE Intell Syst 31(5):76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullan T (2016) How a robot could be grandma’s new carer. The guardian (2016) https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/06/robot-could-be-grandmas-new-care-assistant. Accessed 29 Dec 2019

  • Muller J, Stachniss C, Arras K, Burgard W (2008) Socially inspired motion planning for mobile robots in populated environments, Proc. of international conference on cognitive systems, 2008

  • New Atlas (2019) Riba the friendly robot nurse https://newatlas.com/riba-robot-nurse/12693/ Accessed Aug 3 2019

  • Nisimura R, Uchida T, Lee A, Saruwatan H, Shikano K, Matsumoto Y (2002) ASKA, Receptionist robot with speech dialogue system. IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems

  • Oosterlaken I (2009) Design for development: a capability approach. Des Issue 25(4):91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overby S, Greiner L, Paul LG (2017) What is an SLA? Best practices for service level agreements. CIO Magazine 5th July 2017 https://www.cio.com/article/2438284/outsourcing-sla-definitions-and-solutions.html Accessed Aug 2 2019

  • Pavic M (2010) Robo spiders are multi-legged mechanical marvels Wired https://www.wired.com/2010/04/gallery-spider-robot. Accessed 3 Aug 2019

  • Ramirez OA, Khambhaita H, Chatila R, Chetouani M, Alami R (2016) Robots learning how and where to approach people. 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) August 26–31, 2016. Columbia University, NY, US

  • Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press

  • Stahl BC (2018) Implementing responsible research and innovation for care robots through BS 8611. In: Bendel O (ed) Pflegeroboter. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl B, McBride N, Wakunuma K, Flick C (2014) The empathic care robot: a prototype of responsible research and innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 84:74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman L (2006) Reconfiguring human-robot relations. 15th IEEE international symposium on robots and human interactive communication (RO-MAN06), Hatfield, UK. September 6–8 2006

  • Suchman L (2007) Human-machine reconfigurations: plans and situated action, vol 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman L, Trigg R, Blomberg J (2002) Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype. Br J Sociol 53(2):163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle S (2010) In good company. In: Wilks Y (ed) Close engagements with artificial companions. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam (Willemse)

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government (2019) Care robots could revolutionise UK care system and provide staff extra support https://www.gov.uk/government/news/care-robots-could-revolutionise-uk-care-system-and-provide-staff-extra-support. Accessed Dec 18 2019

  • Vertesi J (2012) Seeing like a rover: visualisation, embodiment and interaction on the mars exploration rover mission. Soc Stud Sci 42(3):393–414

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Willemse CJAM, Toet A, van Erp JBF (2017) Affective and behavioral responses to robot-initiated social touch: toward understanding the opportunities and limitations of physical contact in human–robot interaction. Front ICT 4:12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfield AFT (2019) Ethical standards in robotics and AI. Nat Electron 2:46–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfield AFT, Jirotka M (2018) Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence. Phil Trans R Soc A 376(2133):20180085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye C, Ma S, Wang Y, Li B (2003) Coupled-drive-Based joint dsign of a snake robot and its body lifting method. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Changsha, China October 2003 international conference on robotics, intelligent systems and signal processing

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK

    Neil McBride

Authors
  1. Neil McBride
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil McBride.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McBride, N. Developing socially inspired robotics through the application of human analogy: capabilities and social practice. AI & Soc 35, 857–868 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00948-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00948-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation