This article conducts a mixed-method content analysis of Chinese and American news media coverage of Google DeepMind’s Go playing computer program, AlphaGo. Drawing on humanistic approaches to artificial intelligence, combined with an empirically rigorous content analysis, it examines the differences and overlap in coverage by the Chinese and American press in their accounts of AlphaGo, and its historic match with Korea’s Lee Sedol in March, 2016. The event was not only followed intensely in China, but also made the front page of The New York Times. This article finds that the Chinese press was more likely than the American press to frame AlphaGo as non-threatening, which the authors attribute to cultural differences and the two countries' different understandings of Go. In addition to quantitatively identifying similarities and differences in the framing of AlphaGo, this paper also investigates the underlying and evolving contestations over what constitutes the “human” and the “machine.” It concludes by discussing the implications of the study’s findings as well as outlining avenues for further research.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Antonick G (2016) Reasonable-Seeming but WRONG Approximations of [pi], AlphaGo vs. Go. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com. Accessed 9 May 2017
Bartneck C (2004) From Fiction to Science—a cultural reflection of social robots. In: Proceedings of the CHI2004 workshop on shaping Human–Robot interaction, pp 1–4
Bartneck C, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Nomura T (2007) The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI Soc 21(1–2):217–230
Bartneck C, Kulić D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):71–81
Bostrom N, Yudkowsky E (2014) The ethics of artificial intelligence. The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence, pp 316–334
Brown JS, Duguid P (1998) Organizing knowledge. Calif Manag Rev 40(3):90–111
Buchanan BG (2005) A (very) brief history of artificial intelligence. Ai Mag 26(4):53–59
Coleman R, Banning S (2006) Network TV news’ affective framing of the presidential candidates: evidence for a second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. J Mass Commun Q 83(2):313–328
Ferrari F, Paladino MP, Jetten J (2016) Blurring human–machine distinctions: anthropomorphic appearance in social robots as a threat to human distinctiveness. Int J Soc Robotics 8(2):287–302
Geraci RM (2007) Robots and the sacred in science and science fiction: theological implications of artificial intelligence. Zygon® 42(4):961–980
Geraci RM (2008) Apocalyptic AI: religion and the promise of artificial intelligence. J Am Acad Relig 76(1):138–166
Gunkel D (2017) Mind the gap: responsible robotics and the problem of responsibility. Ethics Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-017-9428-2
Guzman A (2018) Human-Machine Communication. Peter Lang
Horvitz E (2017) AI, people, and society (NY, N.Y.). Science 357(6346):7
Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 6(1):1–55
Luther CA, Zhou X (2005) Within the boundaries of politics: news framing of SARS in China and the United States. J Mass Commun Q 82(4):857–872
Matsunaga M (2010) How to factor-analyze your data right: do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. Int J Psychol Res 3(1):97–110
McFarland (2016) What AlphaGo’s sly move says about machine creativity; Google’s machine is leaving the smartest humans in the dust. The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com. Accessed 9 May 2017
Metz C (2016) In two moves, Lee Sedol and AlphaGo redefined the future. Wired Mag. http://www.wired.com. Accessed 9 May 2017
Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7(4):33–35
Mori M, MacDorman KF, Kageki N (2012) The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 19(2):98–100
Moskowitz ML (2013) Go nation: Chinese masculinities and the game of Weiqi in China, vol 28. University of California Press, Berkeley
Neff G, Nagy P (2016) Automation, algorithms, and politics| talking to Bots: symbiotic agency and the case of Tay. Int J Commun 10:17
Peters John Durham (1999) Speaking into thin air. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Semetko HA, Valkenburg PM (2000) Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. J Commun 50(2):93–109
Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907 39. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):387–420
Strait MK, Aguillon C, Contreras V, Garcia N (2017) The public’s perception of humanlike robots: online social commentary reflects an appearance-based uncanny valley, a general fear of a “Technology Takeover”, and the unabashed sexualization of female-gendered robots. In: 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, pp 1418–1423
Turkle S (2002) Our split screens. Etnofoor 15(1/2):5–19
Turkle S (2005) The second self: computers and the human spirit. MIT Press, New York
Wu Y (2013) “Great Wall Planet”: introducing Chinese science fiction. Sci Fict Stud 40(1):1–14
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Curran, N.M., Sun, J. & Hong, JW. Anthropomorphizing AlphaGo: a content analysis of the framing of Google DeepMind’s AlphaGo in the Chinese and American press. AI & Soc 35, 727–735 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00908-9