Skip to main content

Anthropomorphizing AlphaGo: a content analysis of the framing of Google DeepMind’s AlphaGo in the Chinese and American press

AI & SOCIETY volume 35, pages 727–735 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

This article conducts a mixed-method content analysis of Chinese and American news media coverage of Google DeepMind’s Go playing computer program, AlphaGo. Drawing on humanistic approaches to artificial intelligence, combined with an empirically rigorous content analysis, it examines the differences and overlap in coverage by the Chinese and American press in their accounts of AlphaGo, and its historic match with Korea’s Lee Sedol in March, 2016. The event was not only followed intensely in China, but also made the front page of The New York Times. This article finds that the Chinese press was more likely than the American press to frame AlphaGo as non-threatening, which the authors attribute to cultural differences and the two countries' different understandings of Go. In addition to quantitatively identifying similarities and differences in the framing of AlphaGo, this paper also investigates the underlying and evolving contestations over what constitutes the “human” and the “machine.” It concludes by discussing the implications of the study’s findings as well as outlining avenues for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Antonick G (2016) Reasonable-Seeming but WRONG Approximations of [pi], AlphaGo vs. Go. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com. Accessed 9 May 2017

  • Bartneck C (2004) From Fiction to Science—a cultural reflection of social robots. In: Proceedings of the CHI2004 workshop on shaping Human–Robot interaction, pp 1–4

  • Bartneck C, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Nomura T (2007) The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI Soc 21(1–2):217–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartneck C, Kulić D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N, Yudkowsky E (2014) The ethics of artificial intelligence. The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence, pp 316–334

  • Brown JS, Duguid P (1998) Organizing knowledge. Calif Manag Rev 40(3):90–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan BG (2005) A (very) brief history of artificial intelligence. Ai Mag 26(4):53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman R, Banning S (2006) Network TV news’ affective framing of the presidential candidates: evidence for a second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. J Mass Commun Q 83(2):313–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari F, Paladino MP, Jetten J (2016) Blurring human–machine distinctions: anthropomorphic appearance in social robots as a threat to human distinctiveness. Int J Soc Robotics 8(2):287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraci RM (2007) Robots and the sacred in science and science fiction: theological implications of artificial intelligence. Zygon® 42(4):961–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraci RM (2008) Apocalyptic AI: religion and the promise of artificial intelligence. J Am Acad Relig 76(1):138–166

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunkel D (2017) Mind the gap: responsible robotics and the problem of responsibility. Ethics Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-017-9428-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzman A (2018) Human-Machine Communication. Peter Lang

  • Horvitz E (2017) AI, people, and society (NY, N.Y.). Science 357(6346):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 6(1):1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luther CA, Zhou X (2005) Within the boundaries of politics: news framing of SARS in China and the United States. J Mass Commun Q 82(4):857–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga M (2010) How to factor-analyze your data right: do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. Int J Psychol Res 3(1):97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland (2016) What AlphaGo’s sly move says about machine creativity; Google’s machine is leaving the smartest humans in the dust. The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com. Accessed 9 May 2017

  • Metz C (2016) In two moves, Lee Sedol and AlphaGo redefined the future. Wired Mag. http://www.wired.com. Accessed 9 May 2017

  • Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7(4):33–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori M, MacDorman KF, Kageki N (2012) The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 19(2):98–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz ML (2013) Go nation: Chinese masculinities and the game of Weiqi in China, vol 28. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neff G, Nagy P (2016) Automation, algorithms, and politics| talking to Bots: symbiotic agency and the case of Tay. Int J Commun 10:17

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters John Durham (1999) Speaking into thin air. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Semetko HA, Valkenburg PM (2000) Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. J Commun 50(2):93–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907 39. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):387–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strait MK, Aguillon C, Contreras V, Garcia N (2017) The public’s perception of humanlike robots: online social commentary reflects an appearance-based uncanny valley, a general fear of a “Technology Takeover”, and the unabashed sexualization of female-gendered robots. In: 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, pp 1418–1423

  • Turkle S (2002) Our split screens. Etnofoor 15(1/2):5–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle S (2005) The second self: computers and the human spirit. MIT Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y (2013) “Great Wall Planet”: introducing Chinese science fiction. Sci Fict Stud 40(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern California’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, 3502 Watt Way #304, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA

    Nathaniel Ming Curran, Jingyi Sun & Joo-Wha Hong

Authors
  1. Nathaniel Ming Curran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingyi Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joo-Wha Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathaniel Ming Curran.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Curran, N.M., Sun, J. & Hong, JW. Anthropomorphizing AlphaGo: a content analysis of the framing of Google DeepMind’s AlphaGo in the Chinese and American press. AI & Soc 35, 727–735 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00908-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00908-9

Keywords

  • AlphaGo
  • AI
  • Weiqi
  • Framing
  • Media coverage