Skip to main content

Exploratory analysis of Sony AIBO users


It is important to understand how the cultural background, the age and the gender influence the expectations towards social robots. Although past works studied the user adaptation for some months, the users with multiple years of ownership (heavy users) were not subjects of any experiment to compare these criteria over the years. This exploratory research examines the owners of the discontinued Sony AIBO because these robots have not been abandoned by some enthusiastic users and they are still resold on the secondhand market. 78 Sony AIBO owners were recruited online and their quantitative data were analyzed by four independent variables (age, gender, culture, and length of ownership), user contribution and model preference points of view. The results revealed the motives to own these robots for years and how the heavy users perceived their social robots after a long period in the robot acceptance phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19


  • Bartneck C, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Nomura T (2007) The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with AIBO on their attitudes towards robots. AI Soc 21(1–2):217–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhauerova M (2013) American vs. Japanese management style: which one yields success. MG 201, Introduction to Functions of Management

  • Coninx A et al (2016) Towards long-term social child-robot interaction: using multi-activity switching to engage young users. J Hum Robot Interact 5(1):32–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezer N (2008) Is a robot an appliance, teammate, or friend? Age-related differences in expectations of and attitudes towards personal home-based robots. Georgia Institute of Technology, PhD Dissertation

  • Fernaeus Y, Håkansson M, Jacobsson M, Ljungblad S (2010) How do you play with a robotic toy animal?: A long-term study of pleo. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on interaction design and children ACM, New York, pp 39–48

  • François D, Powell S, Dautenhahn K (2009) A long-term study of children with autism playing with a robotic pet: taking inspirations from non-directive play therapy to encourage children’s proactivity and initiative-taking. Interact Stud 10(3):324–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman B, Kahn PH, Hagman J (2003) ‘‘Hardware companions?’’: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. CHI Lett 5(1):273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M (2004) On activating human communications with pet-type robot AIBO. Proc IEEE 92(11):1804–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gockley R, Bruce A, Forlizzi J, Michalowski M, Mundell A, Rosenthal S, Sellner B, Simmons R, Snipes K, Schultz A, Wang J (2005) Designing robots for long-term social interaction. In: 2005 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 1338–1343

  • Graaf MM, Ben Allouch S, Dijk JA (2014) Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes. In: 3rd international symposium on new frontiers in human-robot interaction (AISB)

  • Graaf MM, Ben Allouch S, Dijk JA (2016) Long-term acceptance of social robots in domestic environments: insights from a user’s perspective. AAAI

  • Haring KS, Mougenot C, Fuminori ONO, Watanabe K (2014) Cultural differences in perception and attitude towards robots. Int J Affect Eng 13(3):149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haring KS, Silvera-Tawil D, Takahashi T, Velonaki M, Watanabe K (2015) Perception of a humanoid robot: a cross-cultural comparison. In: Proc. of 24th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (ROMAN), pp 821–826

  • Kaplan F (2004) Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. Int J Humanoid Rob 1:465–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kertész C, Turunen M (2017) What can we learn from the long-term users of a social robot? In: Proc. of 9th international conference on social robotics (ICSR), 2017

  • Koay K, Syrdal D, Walters M, Dautenhahn K (2007) Living with robots: investigating the habituation effect in participants’ preferences during a longitudinal human-robot interaction study. In: The 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 564–569

  • Leite I, Martinho C, Paiva A (2013) Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey. Int J Soc Robot 5(2):291–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomura T et al (2005) Questionnaire–based research on opinions of visitors for communication robots at an exhibition in japan. In: Proc. of IFIP conference on human-computer interaction, pp 685–698

  • Nomura T, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Kato K (2006) Altered attitudes of people toward robots: investigation through the Negative Attitudes toward Robots Scale. In: Proc. AAAI-06 workshop on human implications of human-robot interaction, pp 29–35

  • Nomura T, Sugimoto K, Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K (2012) Social acceptance of humanoid robots in Japan: a survey for development of the Frankenstein syndrome questionnaire. In: Proc. of 12th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, pp 242–247

  • Norman DA (2004) Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salter T, Dautenhahn K, Bockhorst R (2004) Robots moving out of the laboratory—detecting interaction levels and human contact in noisy school environments. In: Proc. of 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (ROMAN), pp 563–568

  • Samuels D, Zucco C (2012) Using Facebook as a subject recruitment tool for survey-experimental research. Working paper, Social Science Research Network

  • Scopelliti M, Giuliani MV, Fornara F (2005) Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach. J Univ Access Inf Soc 4(2):146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung J, Grinter RE, Christensen HI (2010) Domestic robot ecology. Int J Social Robot 2(4):417–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoldas S (2012) A Research About Buying Behaviours of Online Customers. MSc Thesis, University of Roehampton

  • Zhan K, Zukerman I, Moshtaghi M, Rees G (2016) Eliciting users’ attitudes toward smart devices. In: Proc. of the conference on user modeling adaptation and personalization, pp. 175–184

Download references


The authors want to say thanks to all enthusiastic members of the forums to fill out my questionnaire. Special thanks to Christoph Bartneck who shared his valuable research data to draw better conclusions in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Csaba Kertész.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 663 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kertész, C., Turunen, M. Exploratory analysis of Sony AIBO users. AI & Soc 34, 625–638 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Quantitative research
  • Heavy users
  • Social robot
  • Sony AIBO