Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robot use self-efficacy in healthcare work (RUSH): development and validation of a new measure

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a measure of robot use self-efficacy in healthcare work (RUSH) based on social cognitive theory and the theory of planned behavior. This article provides a briefing on technology-specific self-efficacy and discusses the development, validation, and implementation of an instrument that measures care workers’ self-efficacy in working with robots. The validity evaluation of the Finnish-language measure was based on representative survey samples gathered in 2016. The respondents included practical and registered nurses, homecare workers, and physiotherapists. A majority of the respondents were female. The full instrument consists of a set of six task-specific self-efficacy items concerning general views of technological skills, confidence in learning robot use, and confidence in guiding others in robot use. Three items were chosen for the shorter version of the measure. The face validity, construct validity, and reliability were established to validate the instruments. Both 3-item and 6-item measures were found to be highly consistent in structure. Respondents with high levels of RUSH also reported more general self-efficacy and interest in technology, on average. A very brief instrument of three items is convenient to include in repeated employee surveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahonen O, Kouri P, Kinnunen U-M, Junttila P, Liljamo P, Arifulla D, Saranto K (2016) The development process of eHealth strategy for nurses in Finland. In: Sermeus Walter, Procter Paula M, Weber Patrick (eds) Nursing informatics. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 203–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 32:665–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball J, Murrells T, Rafferty AM, Morrow E, Griffiths P (2014) ‘Care left undone’ during nursing shifts: associations with workload and perceived quality of care. BMJ Qual Saf 23:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck S (2016) The problem of ascribing legal responsibility in the case of robotics. AI Soc 31:473–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekey GA (2005) Autonomous robots: From biological inspiration to implementation and control. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernerth JB, Walker HJ, Harris SG (2011) Change fatigue: development and initial validation of a new measure. Work Stress 25:321–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen N-H, Huang C-T (2016) Domestic technology adoption: comparison of innovation adoption models and moderators. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 26:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Gully SM, Eden D (2001) Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organ Res Methods 4:62–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1991) A social cognitive theory perspective on individual reactions to computing technology. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems, ACM Dec 1991, pp 187–198

  • Decker M (2008) Caregiving robots and ethical reflection: the perspective of interdisciplinary technology assessment. AI Soc 8:315–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL (1991) Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 12:142–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotson T (2014) Authentic virtual others? The promise of post-modern technologies. AI Soc 29:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkkilä S, Simberg S, Hyvärinen M (2016) Jos minä nyt kuitenkin jaksan: Selvitys lähi- ja perushoitajien kokemasta työkuormasta. Finnish Union of Practical Nurses

  • Fraunhofer (2017). Care-O-bot—The Service Robot. https://www.fraunhofer.de/en/research/fields-of-research/health-environment/assistance-systems/service-roboter-care-o-bot.html. Accessed Apr 2017

  • Goeldner M, Herstatt C, Tietze F (2015) The emergence of care robotics—a patent and publication analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change 92:115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB (2003) A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J Res Pers 37:504–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Härkäpää K (1995) Optimism, competence and coping skills. Definitions and empirical studies in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Foundation

  • Heerink M (2011) Exploring the influence of age, gender, education and computer experience on robot acceptance by older adults. In The sixth ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction. Lausanne

  • Henry KE, Hager DN, Pronovost PJ, Saria S (2015) A targeted real-time early warning score (TREWScore) for septic shock. Sci Transl Med 7

  • Johnson DO, Cuijpers RH, Pollmann K, van de Ven AAJ (2016) Exploring the entertainment value of playing games with a humanoid robot. Int J Soc Robot 8:247–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge T, Ilies R (2002) Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. J Appl Psychol 87:797–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SC (2012) Initiation of the SuanLien Living Lab—a living Lab with an Elderly Welfare Focus. Int J of Autom and Smart Tech 2

  • Katz JE, Halpern D (2014) Attitudes towards robots suitability for various jobs as affected robot appearance. Behav Inform Technol 33:941–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpeläinen T (2010) Foreign nurses’ guide to Finnish working life. European Social Fund (ESF)

  • Koceski S, Koceska N (2016) Evaluation of an assistive telepresence robot for elderly healthcare. J Med Syst 40:121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koistinen P, Lilja K (1988) Consensual adaptation to new technology. In: Richard Hyman, Wolfgang Streeck (eds) New technology and industrial relations. Basil Blackwell NY, pp 265–272

  • Koskinen S, Salminen L, Stolt M, Leino-Kilpi H (2014) The education received by nursing students regarding nursing. Scand J Caring 3

  • Laanala R (2017) City of Helsinki Service Centre unitizes video visit. http://www.finlandhealth.fi/-/city-of-helsinki-s-service-centre-utilizes-videovisit-virtual-care-up-to-85-more-cost-efficient-than-physical-home-care. Accessed Apr 2017

  • Lämsä E, Timonen J, Mäntyselkä P, Ahonen R (2017) Pharmacy customers’ experiences with the national online service for viewing electronic prescriptions in Finland. Int J Med Inform 97:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillet É, Mathieu L, Sicotte C (2015) Modeling factors explaining the acceptance, actual use and satisfaction of nurses using an electronic patient record in acute care settings: an extension of the UTAUT. Int J Med Inform 84:36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra Y, Galletta DF (1999) Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Science, pp 1–14

  • Marini CP, Ritter G, Sharma C, McNelis J, Goldberg M, Barrera R (2015) The effect of robotic telerounding in the surgical intensive care units impact on medical education. J Robot Surg 9:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan K, Perron A (2013) Nurses amidst change: the concept of change fatigue offers an alternative perspective on organizational change. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 14:26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melkas H, Hennala L, Pekkarinen S, Kyrki V (2016) Human impact assessment of robot implementation in Finnish elderly care. Proc ICServ 2016:202–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon SP (2015) Maximizing time with the patient: the creative concept of a physician scribe. Curr Oncol Rep 17

  • Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res 2:192–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukai T, Hirano S, Nakashima H., Kato Y, Sakaida Y, Guo S, Hosoe S (2010) Development of a nursing-care assistant robot Riba that can lift a human in its arms. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE/RSJ International Conference (pp 5996–6001). IEEE

  • Niederhauser DS, Perkmen S (2008) Validation of the intrapersonal technology integration scale: assessing the influence of intrapersonal factors that influence technology integration. Comput Sch 25:98–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T (2006) Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction. AI Soc 20:138–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlyansky L, Cairns P, Thimbleby H (2007) Validating the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) tool cross-culturally. Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI… but not as we know it, volume 2. British Computer Society

  • Ornston D (2012) Old Ideas and new investments: divergent pathways to a knowledge economy in Denmark and Finland. Governance 25:687–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MS, Ko M, Warren J, Carpenter D (2016) Healthcare technology self-efficacy (HTSE) and its influence on individual attitude: an empirical study. Comput Hum Behav 58:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reineck C (2007) Models of change. J Nurs Adm 37:388–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes RE, Courneya KS (2004) Differentiating motivation and control in the theory of planned behaviour. Psychol Health Med 9:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romppel M, Herrmann-Lingen C, Wachter R, Edelmann F, Düngen H-D, Pieske B, Grande G (2013) A short form of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE-6): development, psychometric properties and validity in an intercultural non-clinical sample and a sample of patients at risk for heart failure. Psychosoc Med 10:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz U, Doña BG, Sud S, Schwarzer R (2002) Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. Eur J Psychol Assess 18:242–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeders U, Wilhelm O, Olaru G (2016) Meta-heuristics in short scale construction: ant colony optimization and genetic algorithm. PLOS One 11(11)

  • Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M (1995) Optimistic self-beliefs as a resource factor in coping with stress. In Extreme stress and communities: Impact and intervention. Springer Netherlands, pp 159–177

  • Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2012) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14:27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Special Eurobarometer 382 (2012) Public Attitudes towards robots. European Commission

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Teo Keipi from the University of Turku for refining the item translations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Kalevantie 5, 33014, Tampere, Finland

    Tuuli Turja & Atte Oksanen

  2. Laurea University of Applied Sciences, Vantaa, Finland

    Teemu Rantanen

Authors
  1. Tuuli Turja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teemu Rantanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Atte Oksanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuuli Turja.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research is part of the project Robots and the Future of Welfare Services (2015–2020), which is funded by the Academy of Finland’s Strategic Research Council.

Financial disclosure

The authors report no financial conflicts related to this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turja, T., Rantanen, T. & Oksanen, A. Robot use self-efficacy in healthcare work (RUSH): development and validation of a new measure. AI & Soc 34, 137–143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0751-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0751-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation