AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 233–241 | Cite as

On the hermeneutics of everyday things: or, the philosophy of fire hydrants

Original Article

Abstract

It can sometimes be difficult to think about “everyday” objects, those things we are so familiar with that they become taken-for-granted aspects of the backdrop of our world. But what if those objects, despite their everydayness, are politically fraught and call for closer examination? I suggest that insights from two contemporary perspectives, postphenomenology and actor-network theory, are useful for drawing out the experiential, social, and political dynamics of everyday things. In this paper, I review and resituate several key concepts from these two theoretical frameworks and outline a method for using them together for the evaluation of technology. As a guiding example, I explore a paradigmatic everyday device: fire hydrants. Despite their everyday character, hydrants fulfill multiple social roles, some of them loaded with difficult and important political implications.

Keywords

Postphenomenology Multistability Hydrant Actor-network theory Materiality 

References

  1. Akrich M (1992) The de-scription of technical artifacts. In: Bijker WE, Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 205–224Google Scholar
  2. Bender KJ (2015) The draught in California is so bad that people are stealing water. Business Insider, Associated Press. Accessed on 15 Aug 2016. www.businessinsider.com/people-are-stealing-water-in-california-2015-2?r=US&IR=T&IR=T
  3. Fernandez M (2010) Cracking the locks on relief. New York Times, p MB1. Accessed on 15 Aug 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/08/nyregion/08ritual.html?_r=0
  4. Garcia M (2007) City tries to douse a summer tradition. Chicago Tribune July 22nd 2007. Accessed on 15 Aug 2016. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2007-07-22/news/0707210403_1_open-hydrants-water-park-neighborhoods
  5. Hasse C (2015) An anthropology of learning: on nested frictions in cultural ecologies. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heidegger M (2000) Being and Time (trans: Macquarrie J, Robinson E). Oxford, BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  7. Ihde D (1990) Technology and the lifeworld. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. Ihde D (2007) Listening and voice, 2nd edn. SUNY Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  9. Ihde D (2009) Postphenomenology and technoscience: the Peking University lectures. SUNY Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  10. Ihde D (2016a) Husserl’s missing technologies. Fordham University Press, The BronxCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ihde D (2016b) Reply to my interlocutors. Techné 20(2):168–176Google Scholar
  12. Kass G (2012) The hydrant epidemic. White paper, sigelock systems, LCC. Accessed 15 Aug 2016. http://www.sigelock.com/whitepaper.php
  13. Latour B (1992) Where Are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker W, Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society. MIT Press, London, pp 226–258Google Scholar
  14. Latour B (1999) Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Law J, Hassard J (1999) Actor-network theory and after. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Mol A (2002) The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mueller Co, LCC (2016) Hydrant security: taking the first step. White paper, form 12714–Rev 4/16. Accessed on 15 Aug 2016. http://www.muellercompany.com/resources/downloads/Default.aspx?category=bulletins%20_amp_%20miscellaneous
  19. New York City Department of Environmental Protection (2011) DEP kicks off 2011 summer fire hydrant abuse campaign. Press Release 11-59, July 14th 2011. Accessed on 15 Aug 2016. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/press_releases/11-59pr.shtml#.VqMIm_krKUk
  20. Rosenberger R (2009) The sudden experience of the computer. AI & Soc 24:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosenberger R (2013) The importance of generalized bodily habits for a future world of ubiquitous computing. AI & Soc 28:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosenberger R (2014) Multistability and the agency of mundane artifacts: from speed bumps to subway benches. Hum Stud 37:369–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosenberger R (forthcoming a) Notes on a nonfoundational phenomenology of technology. Found Sci. DOI:  10.1007/s10699-015-9480-5
  24. Rosenberger R (forthcoming b) Why it takes both postphenomenology and STS to account for technological mediation. In: Hasse C, Friis JKBO, Tafdrup O, Aagaard J (eds) Postphenomenol Methodol. Lanham: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenberger R (in progress) Guilty technologyGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenberger R, Verbeek PP (eds) (2015) Postphenomenological investigations: essays in human-technology relations. Lexington Books, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  27. Verbeek PP (2011) Moralizing technology. Chicago University Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Washburn G (2004) City’s hydrants getting a new lock. Chicago Tribune Nov 6th 2004. Accessed on 15 Aug 2016. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-11-26/news/0411260108_1_open-hydrants-locking-devices
  29. West C (2013) Locks coming off belfair fire hydrants. KOMO News, Seattle Mar 7th 2013. Accessed on 15 Aug 2016. http://komonews.com/archive/locks-coming-off-belfair-fire-hydrants-11-21-2015

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations