Skip to main content

Ethics of responsibilities distributions in a technological culture

Abstract

In this paper, I develop and differentiate some problems of the interaction between corporations, individuals and the general public as well as institutions like the state or international non-governmental organizations as well as super-national organizations. Firms or corporations are nowadays much more international than they used to be; they are typically multinational enterprises giving rise to special transnational problems of transactions, interchanges and—indeed also—responsibilities ranging over national borders and restricted areas. In our culture, we have to deal with rather ramified types of individual and collective as well as specific corporate responsibilities tending to reach out beyond national borders, specific state law restrictions and even business systems and economies. The traditional personal and individual responsibility and their different forms will not do to cope with all the respective international, intercultural and inter-sectoral problems of modern corporations and their international interactions. In the paper, I have also discussed the question: Do multinational organizations and corporations have a sort of specific corporate responsibility, and if so, against whom and for what—except for their share- and stakeholders?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. Corporate social responsibility is a form of corporate self-regulation integrated into a business model http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_social_responsibility (ISO 26000—Social responsibility), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_26000 and http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/iso26000.htm (Accessed on Nov 21 2015).

  2. Directive/374/EEC—liability for defective products. http://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/directives/council-directive-85-374-eec (Accessed on Nov 21 2015).

  3. IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, USA) IEEE CODE OF ETHICS www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html (Accessed on Nov 21, 2015).

References

  • Bühl WL (1998) Verantwortung für soziale systeme. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy R, Potter E, Page B (1976) Destination disaster. Quadrangle/New York Times Book Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • European Agency and Health at Work (1985) Directive/374/EEC—liability for defective products. http://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/directives/council-directive-85-374-eec. Accessed 21 Nov 2015

  • French PA (1984) Collective and corporate responsibility. Columbia UP, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere RN (1990) Explaining science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart HLA (1968) Punishment and responsibility. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidbrink L (2003) Kritik der Verantwortung. Velbrück, Weilerswist

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey JW, Gert B (1985) Moral rules and moral ideals: a useful distinction in business and professional practice. J Bus Ethics 4:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1968) Kants Werke (Akademie-Textausgabe). De Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd J (1975) The ethics of participation. Nomos 16:98–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (1979) Pragmatische Vernunft. Reclam, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (1982) Zur Sozialphilosophie der Technik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (1988) Distributability problems and challenges to the future resolution of responsibility conflicts. Philos Technol 3(4):1–25. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v3_n4/lenk.html

  • Lenk H (1988b) Konkrete Humanität. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (ed) (1991) Wissenschaft und Ethik. Reclam, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (1992) Zwischen Wissenschaft und Ethik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (2003) Responsibility and risk minimization: outline of an attribution-based approach regarding modern technological and societal systems. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 13(3):203–222

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (2005/2015a, 2nd ed) Responsibility: German perspectives. In Mitcham C (ed) Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics, vol 3. Thompson-Gale, Detroit, pp 1618–1623; (2nd ed. by) Holbrook B, Mitcham C (2015) Ethics, science, technology, and engineering, vol 3. Gale-Centage Learning, Farmington Hills, pp 610–616

  • Lenk H (2007) Global technoscience and responsibility. LIT, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (2010) Das flexible Vielfachwesen. Velbrück, Weilerswist

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (2015b) Human-soziale Verantwortung. Zur Sozialphilosophie der Verantwortlichkeiten. Projektverlag, Bochum-Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (2016) Typologien, Arten und Polaritäten (working title). In: Heidbrink L, Langbehn C, Sombetzki J (eds) Handbuch Verantwortung. Springer, Wiesbaden (forthcoming)

  • Lenk H, Maring M (1990) Responsibility for land use and the problem of social traps. In: Fitch DBS, Pikalo A (eds) Socio-economic Aspects of Land Use Planning. Lang, Frankfurt/M, pp 31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H, Maring M (eds) (1991) Technikverantwortung. Güterabwägung Riskiobewertung - Verhaltenskodizes. Lang, Frankfurt/M

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H, Maring M (eds) (1992) Wirtschaft und Ethik. Reclam, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H, Maring M (1996a) Responsibility and social traps. Int J Appl Philos 1:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H, Maring M (1996b) Engineering between can and ought. Interdiscip Sci Rev 21:316–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H, Maring M (2001) Responsibility and technology. In: Auhagen A, Bierhoff H-W (eds) Responsibility—the many faces of a social phenomenon. Routledge, London, pp 93–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H, Ropohl G (eds) (1987, 1993) Technik und Ethik. Reclam, Stuttgart

  • Maring M (2001) Kollektive und korporative Verantwortung. LIT, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents. Basic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1951) Models of man. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1979) Models of thought. Yale, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane PH (1985) Persons, rights, and corporations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The paper is of enormous significance to the special issue “Philosophy of Technological Culture” in several ways. The ethics of responsibilities distributions play a crucial role in enforcing a paradigm in the critical development of science and technology which seems to open a perspective for the philosophy of technology and culture. The ethics of responsibilities distributions is of vital importance for our technological culture—Note from the Guest Editor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Lenk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lenk, H. Ethics of responsibilities distributions in a technological culture. AI & Soc 32, 219–231 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0642-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0642-3

Keywords

  • Moral
  • Responsibility
  • Ethics
  • Technology
  • Culture