Care robots and the future of ICT-mediated elderly care: a response to doom scenarios


The discussion about robots in elderly care is populated by doom scenarios about a totally dehumanized care system in which elderly people are taken care of by machines. Such scenarios are helpful as they attend us to what we think is important with regard to the quality elderly care. However, this article argues that they are misleading in so far as they (1) assume that deception in care is always morally unacceptable, (2) suggest that robots and other information technologies necessarily deceive elderly people by creating a “virtual” world as opposed to a “real” world, (3) assume that elderly people of the future have similar ICT skills and interests as the elderly people of today, and (4) assume a simplistic view of technologies. The article suggests an approach to evaluating care robots and ICT in health care which acknowledges and addresses a number of ethical problems raised by robotic care—for instance disengagement problems—while taking into account that some elderly people may need care that does not treat them as (empirically) autonomous, that many the elderly of the future are likely to be digital natives, and that the task of evaluating technologies in care is more complicated than the discussion of deception suggests.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Borgmann A (1984) Technology and the character of contemporary life: a philosophical inquiry. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coeckelbergh M (2011) Human development or human enhancement? A methodlogical reflection on capabilities and the evaluation of information technologies. Ethics Inf Technol 13:81–92. doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9231-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coeckelbergh M (2012) “How I learned to love the robot”: capabilities, information technologies, and elderly care. In: Oosterlaken I, van den Hoven J (eds) The capability approach, technology and design. Springer, New York, pp 77–86

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coeckelbergh M (2013) E-care as craftsmanship: virtuous work, skilled engagement, and information technology in health care. Med Health Care Philos 16:807–816. doi:10.1007/s11019-013-9463-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dreyfus H (2001) On the Internet, revised, 2nd edn. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Floridi L (2011) The construction of personal identities online. Minds Mach 21:477–479. doi:10.1007/s11023-011-9254-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kidd CD, Taggart W, Turkle S (2006) A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. In: Proceedings of ICRA, Orlando, pp 3972–3976

  8. Nussbaum MC (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Nussbaum MC (2006) Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nussbaum MC, Sen A (eds) (1993) The quality of life. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2012) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14:27–40. doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds Mach 16:141–161. doi:10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Coeckelbergh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coeckelbergh, M. Care robots and the future of ICT-mediated elderly care: a response to doom scenarios. AI & Soc 31, 455–462 (2016).

Download citation


  • Care robots
  • Elderly care
  • Information technology
  • Deception
  • The social
  • Disengagement
  • Modernity
  • Capability approach
  • Care craftsmanship