AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 157–166 | Cite as

Heidegger on technology and Gelassenheit: wabi-sabi and the art of Verfallenheit

Original Article

Abstract

The question of the contemporary relevance of Heidegger’s reflections on technology to today’s advanced technology is here explored with reference to the notion of “entanglement” towards a review of Heidegger’s understanding of technology and media, including the entertainment industry and modern digital life. Heidegger’s reflections on Gelassenheit have been connected with the aesthetics of the tea ceremony, disputing the material aesthetics of porcelain versus plastic. Here by approaching the art of wabi-sabi as the art of Verfallenheit, I argue that Gelassenheit may be understood in these terms.

Keywords

Heidegger Media studies, technology Gelassenheit Entanglement Wabi-sabi 

References

  1. Anders G (1956) Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen Bd. I: Über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution. C.H. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  2. Babich B (2003) From Van Gogh’s museum to the temple at Bassae: Heidegger’s truth of art and Schapiro’s art history. Cult Theory Crit 44(2):151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babich B (2013) O, Superman! or being towards transhumanism: Martin Heidegger, Günther Anders, and Media Aesthetics. Divinatio (Autumn/Winter) 36:83–99Google Scholar
  4. Babich B (2014) Constellating Technology: Heidegger’s Die Gefahr/The Danger. In: Babich B, Ginev D (eds) The multidimensionality of hermeneutic phenomenology. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babich B (2015) Aspect reflections on R. Scott Bakker’s The Three Pound Brain. http://diogenesinthemarketplace.blogspot.com/2015/02/aspect-reflections-on-r-scott-bakkers.html
  6. Babich B (2016) Heidegger’s black night: the Nachlass and its Wirkungsgeschichte. In: Farin I, Malpas J (eds) Heidegger’s Black Notebooks. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Babor ER (2010) Philosophy’s entanglement in metaphysics and ontology and their relationship to science and technology in Heideggerian philosophy. Liceo J Higher Educ Res 6(2):188–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernays EL (1923) Crystallizing public opinion. Boni and Liverwright, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatia MS (2009) Internet sex addiction—a new distinct disorder. Delhi Psychiatry J 12(1):3–4Google Scholar
  10. Binder W (1993) Aether und Abgrund in Hölderlins Dichtung. In: Pöggeler O (ed) Frankfurt aber ist die Nabel dieser Erde. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, pp 349–369Google Scholar
  11. Bokulich A, Jaeger G (eds) (2010) Philosophy of quantum information and entanglement. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyle N (2000) Goethe: the poet and the age. Volume II: revolution and renunciation, 1790–1803. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. d’Espagnat B (2009) Quantum weirdness: what we call ‘Reality’ is just a state of mind. The GuardianGoogle Scholar
  14. Danto A (1997) After the end of art: contemporary art and the pale of history. University of California Press, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  15. Danto A (2014) What art is. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  16. Derrida J (1987) The Truth in Painting (trans. G Bennington and I McLeod). University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Dickie G (1974) What is art? An institutional analysis. In: Dickie, Art and the aesthetic: an institutional analysis. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Dreyfus H (1995) Heidegger on gaining a free relationship to technology. In: Feenberg A, Hannay A (eds) Technology and the politics of knowledge. Indiana University Press, Indiana, pp 97–106Google Scholar
  19. Feyerabend P (1996) Killing time: the autobiography of Paul Feyerabend. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  20. Foster H (ed) (1983) The anti-aesthetic: essays on postmodern culture. Bay Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuchs C (2015) Martin Heidegger’s anti-semitism: philosophy of technology and the media in the light of the black notebooks. Implications for the reception of Heidegger in media and communication studies. Triple C Commun Capital Crit 13:55–78Google Scholar
  22. Georgakis T, Ennis P (eds) (2014) Heidegger in the 21st century. Continuum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Heelan PA (2015) The observable. In: Bitbol M, Preface, Babich B, Foreword. Peter Lang, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Heidegger M (1959) An introduction to metaphysics (trans. Manheim R). Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  25. Heidegger M (1966) Discourse on thinking (trans. Anderson JM, Freund EH). Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Heidegger M (1971) The origin of the work of art (trans. Hofstadter A). In: Poetry, language, thought. Harper & Row, pp 17–81Google Scholar
  27. Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology (trans. Lovitt W). Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Heidegger M (2014) Überlegungen, XII–XV (Schwarze Hefte 1939–1941). GA 96. Vittorio Klostermann, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  29. Holldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hornbacher A (1995) Die Blume des Mundes. Zu Hölderlins poetisch-poetologischem Sprachdenken, Königshausen und Neumann, WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  31. Ihde D (2012) Can continental philosophy deal with the new technologies? J Specul Philos 1/26(2):321–332Google Scholar
  32. Illich I (1993) In the vineyard of the text: a commentary to Hugh’s Didascalicon. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  33. Janke W (2005) Archaischer Gesang: Pindar, Hölderlin, Rilke, Werke und Wahrheit. Königshausen un Neumann, WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  34. Juniper A (2013) Wabi sabi. The Japanese art of impermanence. Tuttle, BostonGoogle Scholar
  35. Kittler F (2009) Towards an ontology of media. Theory Cult Soc 26(2–3):23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kleinman DL, Suryanarayanan S (2013) Honey bees under threat: a political pollinator crisis. The GuardianGoogle Scholar
  37. Koren L (1994) Wabi Sabi for artists, designers, poets and philosophers. Stone Bridge Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  38. Lacoste J (2000) L’œil clairement ouvert sur la nature. Heidegger et Goethe. Littérature 120:105–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Latour B (1993) We have never been modern (trans. C Porter). Harvester Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Lingis A (2003) Animal bodies, inhuman face. In: Wolfe C (ed) Zoontologies: the question of the animal. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  41. Mandelartz M (2011) Goethe, Newton und die Wissenschaftstheorie. Zur Wissenschaftskritik und zur Methodologie der Farbenlehre. Mandelartz, Goethe, Kleist. Literatur, Politik und Wissenschaft um 1800, Erich Schmidt, pp 240–281Google Scholar
  42. Okakura K (2010) The book of tea. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Parikka J (2010) Insect media: an archaeology of animals and technology. University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  44. Pöggeler O (1989) Wachst das Rettende Auch? Heideggers letzte Wege. In: Biemel W, von Herrmann F-W (eds) Kunst und Technik: Gedächtnisschrift zum, vol 100. Geburtstag von Martin Heidegger. Vittorio Klostermann, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  45. Postman N (1993) Technopoly: the surrender of culture to technology. Vintage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Saito Y (1997) The Japanese aesthetics of imperfection and insufficiency. J Aesthet Art Crit (Autumn) 55(4):377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schürmann R (1973) Heidegger and Meister Eckhart on Releasement. Res Phenomenol 3(1):95–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schyfter, P (2009) Entangled ontologies: a sociophilosophical analysis of technological artefacts, subjects, and bodies. Diss. Science and Technology Studies Program: University of EdinbourghGoogle Scholar
  49. Sen S (1979) Tea life, tea mind. Weatherhill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Sharma VP, Kumar NR (2010) Changes in honeybee behaviour and biology under the influence of cellphone radiations. Curr Sci 98(10):1376–1378Google Scholar
  51. Sheehan T (2014) Making sense of Heidegger: a paradigm shift. Rowman & Littlefield, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  52. Tanizaki J (2001) In praise of shadows. Vintage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Tripathi AK (2010) Ethics and aesthetics of technologies. AI Soc 25(1):5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van den Bossche M (2015) Releasement and Nihilism in the art of living with technology. Found Sci 20Google Scholar
  55. von Helmholtz H (1892/1979) Goethe’s Vorahnungen kommender naturwissenschaftlicher Ideen. In: Mandelkow KR (ed) Goethe im Urteil seiner Kritiker. III. C.H. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  56. Wolf N (2013) How porn is destroying modern sex lives. Daily Mail, 12 Dec 2013, p 49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fordham UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations