AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 175–189 | Cite as

Language and technology: maps, bridges, and pathways

Original Article

Abstract

Contemporary philosophy of technology after the empirical turn has surprisingly little to say on the relation between language and technology. This essay describes this gap, offers a preliminary discussion of how language and technology may be related to show that there is a rich conceptual space to be gained, and begins to explore some ways in which the gap could be bridged by starting from within specific philosophical subfields and traditions. One route starts from philosophy of language (both “analytic” and “continental”: Searle and Heidegger) and discusses some potential implications for thinking about technology; another starts from artefact-oriented approaches in philosophy of technology and STS and shows that these approaches might helpfully be extended by theorizing relationships between language and technological artefacts. The essay concludes by suggesting a research agenda, which invites more work on the relation between language and technology.

Keywords

Language Technology Social ontology Phenomenology Hermeneutics Mediation Heidegger Searle Ihde Latour 

References

  1. Achterhuis H (ed) (2001) American philosophy of technology: the empirical turn: Bloomington and IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  2. Akrich M (1992) The de-scription of technological objects. In: Bijker WE, Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 205–224Google Scholar
  3. Bennett-Hunter G (2007) Heidegger on philosophy and language. Philos Writ 35(2):5–16Google Scholar
  4. Carman T (2002) Was heidegger a linguistic idealist? Inquiry 45(2):205–215MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark A (1997) Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA and LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Coeckelbergh M (2002) Liberation and passion: reconstructing the passion perspective on human being and freedom. DenkMalVerlag, Alfter/BonnGoogle Scholar
  7. Coeckelbergh M (2010) You, robot: on the linguistic construction of artificial others. AI Soc 26(1):61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coeckelbergh M (2012) Growing moral relations: critique of moral status ascription. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deetz S (1973) Words without things: toward a social phenomenology of language. Quart J Speech 59(1):40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dreyfus H (1995) Heidegger on gaining a free relation to technology. In: Feenberg A, Hannay A (eds) Technology and the politics of knowledge. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. Heidegger M (1927) Being and time (trans. Joan Stambaugh). State University of New York Press, Albany, 1996Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger M (1967) Pathmarks. In W. McNeill (ed) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology. In Heidegger M (ed) The question concerning technology and other essays (trans. W. Lovitt). Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Heidegger M (1998) Traditional language and technological language (trans. Wanda Torres Gregory). J Philos Res 23:129–145Google Scholar
  15. Ihde D (1990) Technology and the lifeworld: from garden to earth. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  16. Ihde D (1998) Expanding hermeneutics: visualism in science. Northwestern University Press, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaplan DM (2006) Paul ricoeur and the philosophy of technology. J French Philos 16(1–2):42–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kusch M (1989) Language as calculus versus language as universal medium: a study in husserl, heidegger and gadamer. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lafont C (1994) Heidegger, language, and world-disclosure (trans. Graham Harman). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Lafont C (2002) Précis of heidegger, language, and world-disclosure. Inquiry 45:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Latour B (1991) We have never been modern. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Latour B (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker WE, Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 225–258Google Scholar
  23. Latour B (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. McLuhan M (1964) Understanding media: the extensions of man. Routledge, London and New York, p 2001Google Scholar
  25. Mitcham C (1994) Thinking through technology: the path between engineering and philosophy. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Okrent M (2002) Equipment, world, and language. Inquiry 45:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Owens WD (1987) Heidegger and the philosophy of language. Auslegung 14(1):48–66Google Scholar
  28. Ratcliffe M (2008) Feelings of being: phenomenology, psychiatry, and the sense of reality. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Searle JR (1995) The construction of social reality. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Searle JR (2006) Social ontology. Anthropol Theory 6(1):12–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Verbeek P-P (2005) What things do. Pennsylvania State University Press, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  32. Verbeek P-P (2012) Expanding mediation theory. Found Sci 17(4):391–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wheeler M (2004) Is language the ultimate artefact? Lang Sci 26(6):693–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Winner L (1980) Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109(1):121–136Google Scholar
  35. Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical Investigations, 4th edn (trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and J. Schulte). Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2009Google Scholar
  36. Wrathall M (2005) How to read heidegger. Granta Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Ziarek K (2013) Giving its word: event (as) language. In Powell J (ed) Heidegger and language. Indiana University Press, pp 102–118Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Computing and Social ResponsibilityDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations