Skip to main content
Log in

Revisiting the self: a sine qua non for understanding embodiment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A major stumbling block in understanding the full significance of embodiment is the reflexive self-conception characterised by free-floating nature. The paper, in the initial sections, looks into the sensory motor approach to phenomenal consciousness and the approach to the study of vision where the world is treated as an external memory. Subsequently, the paper argues that the difficulty in exploring the sensory motor approach to phenomenal consciousness stems from the free-floating self-conception humans is endowed with. The assumption that experiences are internal can make us closed to the role external factors play in constituting experience.  Accordingly, a revision in the self-conception carries the possibility of conceptualising experience in a different manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chalmers D (1996) The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. OUP, Newyork

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A, Chalmers D (1998) The extended mind. Analysis 58:10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D (1986) Julian Jaynes’s software archaeology. Can Psychol 27:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JSBT (2010) Thinking twice: two minds in one brain. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J (1983) The modularity of mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameroff S, Penrose R (1996) Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness? In: Hameroff SR, Kaszniak AW, Scott AC (eds) Toward a science of consciousness—the first Tucson discussions and debates. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 507–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland J (1998) “Mind embodied and embedded” in Having thought: essays in metaphysics of mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley S (1998) Consciousness in action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes J (1976) Origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Houghton, Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch C (2012) Confessions of a romantic reductionist. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary M (2004) The curse of the self. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow A (1964) Religions, values and peak experiences. Wiking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1974) What it is like to be a bat? Philos Rev 83(4):435–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan H (2013) Embodied cognition and the Orwell’s problem in cognitive science. Artif Intell Soc. doi:10.1007/s00146-013-0496-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe A (2010) Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness, First edn. Hill and Wang, Newyork

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan J (1992) Kevin solving the real mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. Can J Psychol 46(3):461–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan JK (2011) Why red doesn’t sound like a bell: understanding the feel of consciousness. OUP, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P, Aydede M (2009) A short primer on situated cognition. The Cambridge handbook on situated cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M (2002) Psychon Bull Rev 9(4):625–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RA, Clark A (2009) How to situate cognition: letting nature take its course. In: Robbins P, Aydede M (eds) The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Wilson AB, Golonka S (2013) Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Front Psychol. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Hari Narayanan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Narayanan, V.H. Revisiting the self: a sine qua non for understanding embodiment. AI & Soc 31, 79–84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-014-0574-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-014-0574-3

Keywords

Navigation