AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 103–108 | Cite as

Considerations about the relationship between animal and machine ethics

Open Forum

Abstract

Ethics researches morality in respect to humans and animals. Usually, it implies human morality; therefore, the focus is on human–human relationships (generally in ethics) and human–animal relationships (in animal ethics). Ethics can also deal with the morality of machines such as unmanned aerial vehicles, robots and agents or of self-driving cars and computers in automated trading, in other words more or less autonomous systems and programs. Machine ethics almost exclusively concentrates on machine–human relationships rather than on machine–animal relationships. Before this background, this article contributes some basic considerations about the relationship between animal and machine ethics.

Keywords

Animal ethics Machine ethics Robot ethics Information ethics Technology ethics Moral machines Animal–machine interaction 

References

  1. Anderson M, Anderson SL (eds) (2011) Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bendel O (2003) Pädagogische Agenten im Corporate E-Learning. Doctoral Thesis. Difo, St. GallenGoogle Scholar
  3. Bendel O (2012a) Maschinenethik. Beitrag für das Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon. Gabler/Springer, Wiesbaden. http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Definition/maschinenethik.html. Accessed 28 Nov 2013
  4. Bendel O (2012b) Die Rache der Nerds. UVK, KonstanzGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendel O (2012c) Die Moral der Maschinen. Überlegungen zur Maschinenethik. In: inside-it.ch. http://www.inside-it.ch/articles/30517. Accessed Nov 28, 2013
  6. Bendel O (2012d) Die Medizinethik in der Informationsgesellschaft. Überlegungen zur Stellung der Informationsethik. In: Informatik-Spektrum, (“Online-First”-Article on SpringerLink)Google Scholar
  7. Bendel O (2013a) Towards a machine ethics. In: Technology assessment and policy areas of great transitions: book of abstracts. 1st PACITA Project Conference, Prague, March 13–15, 2013, p 229–230Google Scholar
  8. Bendel O (2013b) Good bot, bad bot. In: UnternehmerZeitung, 7(19), p 30–31 Google Scholar
  9. Büttner R (2011) Projekt Sartre. Der Traum vom selbstständig fahrenden Auto. In: Spiegel Online, January 20, 2011. http://www.spiegel.de/auto/aktuell/projekt-sartre-der-traum-vom-selbststaendig-fahrenden-auto-a-740501.html. Accessed Nov 28, 2013
  10. MacDorman KF (2005) Androids as an experimental apparatus: Why is there an Uncanny Valley and can we exploit it? In: Proceedings of the CogSci 2005 Workshop: toward social mechanisms of android science, Stresa. http://www.androidscience.com/proceedings2005/MacDormanCogSci2005AS.pdf. Accessed Nov 28, 2013
  11. Wendt J (2013) Brauchen wir Roboterschutz-Gesetze? In: ZEIT ONLINE, May 10, 2013. http://www.zeit.de/digital/internet/2013-05/roboter-ethik-kate-darling. Accessed Nov 28, 2013
  12. Wild M (2006) Die anthropologische Differenz: Der Geist der Tiere in der frühen Neuzeit. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. Wolf U (2012) Ethik der Mensch-Tier-Beziehung. Klostermann, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  14. Wollan M (2010) Mapping traffic’s toll on wildlife. In: The New York Times, September 12, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/technology/13roadkill.html. Accessed Nov 28, 2013

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business, Institute for Information SystemsUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW)WindischSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations