AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 3–10 | Cite as

The construction of self in social medias, such as Facebook

Original Article

Abstract

Social medias have changed and challenge the way we interact with each other. Social medias, such as Facebook, open up new possibilities for presentation of self and of managing the self you present to others. Is this process different for those that have grown up with social medias (The Net Generation) [Tapscott (Growing up digital: the rise of the net generation. Mcgraw-Hill, NY, 1998)] from how an older group of social media users would do it? What is their primary use of Facebook and how does this differ between generations? Such questions are discussed through engaging a group of Facebook users, with clear ideas of why and how they use Facebook, in joint reflections. The participants represent two generations of internet users; Those who was introduced to internet and social medias, such as Facebook, as adults (i.e. 40 years and older) and those who have grown up with the technology (i.e. under 25 years old, also called “The Net Generation”). The discussion indicate that there are differences in how these two groups relate to social medias, such as Facebook and for what they use Facebook. Further research is necessary to pursue those differences.

Keywords

Social medias Facebook Net generation Presentation of self 

References

  1. Acquisti A, Gross R (2006) Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In: Golle P, Danezis G (eds) Proceedings of 6th workshop on privacy enhancing technologies. Robinson College, Cambridge, pp 36–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd D (2008) Facebook’s Privacy trainwreck: exposure, invasion, and social convergence. Convergence 14(1):13–20Google Scholar
  3. Boyd D, Ellison N (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput-Mediat Commun 13(1):210–230Google Scholar
  4. Bullen M, Morgan T, Belfer K, Quayyum A (2009) The net generation in higher education: rhetoric and reality. Int J Excell E-Learn 2(1):1–13Google Scholar
  5. Burke M, Marlow C, Lento T (2009) Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. Conference on human factors in computing systems, conference paperGoogle Scholar
  6. Castells M (2000) The rise of the network society. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge/OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Geertz C (1973) Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. In: Geertz C (ed) The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books, NYGoogle Scholar
  8. Goffman E (1959/1982) The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin Books, MiddlesexGoogle Scholar
  9. Hauge HA (2011) How can employee empowerment be made conducive to both employee health and organisation performance? Dissertation for the degree of philosophiae doctor (PhD), University of Bergen, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  10. Howe N, Strauss W (2000) Millenials rising: the next great generation. Random House, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. Hylland Eriksen T (2001) Øyeblikkets tyranni (the Tyranny of the Moment). AschehougGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirkpatrick D (2010) The Facebook effect: the inside story of the company that is connecting the world. Simon & Schuster, NYGoogle Scholar
  13. Kollock P (1999) The economies of online cooperation: gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In Smith MA, Kollock P (eds) Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge, London, pp 220–239Google Scholar
  14. Pålshaugen Ø (2004) How to do things with words. Towards a linguistic turn in action research? Concepts Transform 9(2):181–203Google Scholar
  15. Parsons T (1951) The social system. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Prensky M (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. In: On the Horizon, NCB University Press 9(5)Google Scholar
  17. Shotter J (1993) Conversational realities: constructing life through language. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Tapscott D (1998) Growing up digital: the rise of the net generation. McGraw-Hill, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Tapscott D (2009) Grown up digital: how the net generation is changing your world. McGraw-Hill, NYGoogle Scholar
  20. Thagaard T (2003) Systematikk og Innlevelse. En innføring i kvalitativ metode. (2 utg). FagbokforlagetGoogle Scholar
  21. The Slow Food Manifesto. http://www.slowfood.com/international/2/our-philosophy. Retrieved 2011-05-15
  22. Zuckerberg M. “Facebook’s Zuckerberg says the age of privacy is over,” Read Write Web (9 January 2010). http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebooks_zuckerberg_says_the_age_of_privacy_is_ov.php. Read 15th May 2011

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fafo Institute for Labour and Social ResearchOsloNorway
  2. 2.Norsk TjenestemannslagOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations