Cognitive revolution, virtuality and good life


We are living in an era when the focus of human relationships with the world is shifting from execution and physical impact to control and cognitive/informational interaction. This emerging, increasingly informational world is our new ecology, an infosphere that presents the grounds for a cognitive revolution based on interactions in networks of biological and artificial, intelligent agents. After the industrial revolution, which extended the human body through mechanical machinery, the cognitive revolution extends the human mind/cognition through information-processing machinery. These novel circumstances come with new qualities and preferences demanding new conceptualizations. We have some work ahead of us to establish value systems and practices extended from the real to the increasingly virtual/info-computational. This paper first presents a current view of the virtual versus the real and then offers an interpretation framework based on an info-computational understanding of cognition in which agency implies computational processing of informational structures of the world as an infosphere. The notion of “good life” is discussed in light of different ideals of well-being in the infosphere, connecting virtuality as a space of potential and alternative worlds for an agent for whom the reality is a space of actual experiences, in the sense of Deleuze. Even though info-computational framework enables us to see both the real world and the diversity of virtual worlds in terms of computational processes on informational structures, based on a distinct layered cognitive architecture of all physical agents, there is clear difference between potential worlds of the virtual and actual agent’s experiences made in the real. Info-computationalism enables insight into the mechanisms of infosphere and elucidates its importance as cognitively predominant environment and communication media. The conclusion is that by cocooning ourselves in an elaborate info-computational infrastructure of the virtual, we may be increasingly isolating ourselves from the reality of direct experience of the world. The biggest challenges of the cognitive revolution may not be technological but ethical. They are about the nature of being human and its values.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    A typical example is eavesdropping, which is strictly regulated when phones or classical mails are used for communication, but often not even recognized as a problem in digital communications.


  1. Aliaga D (1997) Virtual objects in the real world. Commun ACM (CACM) 40(3):49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brey P (1999) The ethics of representation and action in virtual reality. Ethics Inf Technol 1:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bynum T (2011) Computer and information ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), Edward N Zalta (ed), URL=

  4. Castronova E (2007) Exodus to the virtual world: how online fun is changing reality. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coeckelbergh M (2009) The public thing: on the idea of a politics of artefacts. Techne 13(3)

  6. De Laat PB (2005) Trusting virtual trust. Ethics Inf Technol 7:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. de Souza e Silva A (2004) From simulations to hybrid space: how nomadic technologies change the real. Technoetic Arts 1(3):209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deleuze G (1994) Difference and repetition. Translated by Paul Patton, New York: Columbia University Press, as quoted in Alain Badiou (1999) Deleuze: The Clamor of Being, University of Minnesota Press, pp 208–212

  9. Dibbell J (1998) My tiny life: crime and passion in a virtual world. An Awl Book Henry Holt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dodig-Crnkovic G (2003) Shifting the paradigm of the philosophy of science: the philosophy of information and a new renaissance. Minds Mach: Special Issue on the Philosophy of Information, 13(4).

  11. Dodig-Crnkovic G (2006) On the importance of teaching professional ethics to computer science students. E-CAP 2004 Conference, Pavia, Italy. (To be published in: L. Magnani, Computing and philosophy. Associated International Academic Publishers, Pavia)

  12. Dodig-Crnkovic G (2006a) Investigations into information semantics and ethics of computing. Mälardalen University Press.

  13. Dodig-Crnkovic G (2009) Information and computation nets. Investigations into info-computational world (book). VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller, Germany

  14. Dodig-Crnkovic G (2010) The cybersemiotics and info-computationalist research programmes as platforms for knowledge production in organisms and machines. Entropy 12: 878–901.

  15. Dodig-Crnkovic G (2011) Dynamics of information as natural computation. Information, selected papers from FIS 2010 Beijing Conference.

  16. Dodig-Crnkovic G, Horniak V (2005) Good to have someone watching us from a distance? Privacy vs. security at the workplace. In: Brey P, Grodzinsky F, Introna L (eds) Ethics of new information technology. Proceedings of the sixth international conference of computer ethics: philosophical enquiry, CEPE 2005, July 17–19. University of Twente, Enschede

  17. Dodig-Crnkovic G, Larsson T (2005) Game ethics - Homo Ludens as a computer game designer and consumer. Int J Inf Ethics. Special Issue on The Ethics of E-Games 4.

  18. Dodig-Crnkovic G, Müller V (2009) A dialogue concerning two world systems: info-computational vs. mechanistic. In: Dodig-Crnkovic G, Burgin M (eds) Information and computation. World Scientific Publishing Co. Series in Information Studies

  19. Fiss PC, Hirsch PM (2005) The discourse of globalization: framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. Am Sociol Rev 70(1):29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Floridi L (2007) A look into the future impact of ICT on our lives. Inf Soc 23(1):59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Floridi L (2008) A defense of informational structural realism. Synthese 161:2, Springer, pp 219–253

  22. Floridi L, Sanders JW (2001) Artificial evil and the foundation of computer ethics. Ethics Inf Technol 3(1):55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Floridi L, Savulescu J (2006) Information ethics: agents, artefacts and new cultural perspectives. Ethics Inf Technol 8(4):155–156

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heim M (1993) The metaphysics of virtual reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huff C, Johnson D, Miller K (2003) Virtual harms and real responsibilities. IEEE Technol Soc Mag, Summer 2003, IEEE

  26. Introna L (2008) Phenomenological approaches to ethics and information technology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter Edition), EN Zalta (ed).

  27. Johnson DG (1997) Ethics online. Commun ACM 40(1):60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ladyman J, Ross D, Spurrett D, Collier J (2007) Everything must go: metaphysics naturalized. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 1–368

    Google Scholar 

  29. Latour B (1993) We have never been modern (trans: Catherine Porter). Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Melzer AM, Weinberger J, Zinman MR (1993) Technology in the western political tradition. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  31. Minsky M (1988) The society of mind. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Moor J (1985) What is computer ethics? Metaphilosophy 16(4):266–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nissenbaum H (2001) Securing trust online: wisdom or oxymoron? Boston Law Rev 81:635–664

    Google Scholar 

  34. Petry LC (2010) Some remarks on ontological-cognitive structures in the metaverse. J Virtual Worlds Res 2(5). The Metaverse Assembled

  35. Pettit P (1995) The cunning of trust. Philos Public Aff 24(3):202–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pettit P (2004) Trust, reliance and the internet. Analyse und Kritik 26:108–121

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pinker S (2003) The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature. Penguin ISBN 0142003344

  38. Poulymenakou A et al (2007) Exploring the nature of virtuality, virtuality and virtualization. IFIP Int Fed Inf Process 236:373–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sayre KM (1976) Cybernetics and the philosophy of mind. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  40. Søraker JH (2010) The value of virtual worlds and entities: a philosophical analysis of virtual worlds and their potential impact on well-being [dissertation]. Ipskamp, Enschede

  41. Strain J (2007) Ethics in the virtual world. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc 5(1):4–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tsekeris C (2008) Thoughts on the nature of the virtual. Ubiquity

  43. Weick KE (1999) Sensemaking as an organizational dimension of global change. In: Cooperrider David L, Jane E (eds) Organizational dimensions of global change. Sage, Dutton, pp 39–56

    Google Scholar 

  44. Weizenbaum J (1976) Computer Power and human reason: from judgment to calculation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wertheim M (1999) The pearly gates of cyberspace: a history of space from dante to the internet. Norton and Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The author greatly appreciates the anonymous reviewers’ valuable and detailed comments.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dodig-Crnkovic, G. Cognitive revolution, virtuality and good life. AI & Soc 28, 319–327 (2013).

Download citation


  • Cognitive revolution
  • Virtual worlds
  • Ethics of the virtual
  • Good life