AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 421–425 | Cite as

Older workers: a suitable case for circles?

Open Forum
  • 163 Downloads

Abstract

The article considers relations between the generations, with particular attention given to older workers, who also face the pressures of responsibilities to both parents and children. The situations in Norway and the UK are compared. The case is made for support structures, such as senior quality circles, at the threshold between employment and retirement.

Keywords

Intergenerational relations Life course Quality circles Seniors Senior quality circles Transitions 

References

  1. Augustinaitis A, Ennals R, Malinauskiene E, Petrauskas R (2009) E-redesigning of society: towards experiential connectivity of generations in Lithuania. AI Soc 23(1):41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baily C (2009) Reverse intergenerational learning. AI Soc 23(1):111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berglund J (2009) Discourses on age: confronting disputed concepts by means of dialogue. AI Soc 23(1):117–122MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cable V (2009) The storm. Atlantic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapagain D (2006) Guide to students’ quality circles. Network for Quality, Productivity and Competitiveness, NepalGoogle Scholar
  6. Ennals R (1999) Work life 2000: yearbook 1. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ennals R (2000) Work life 2000: yearbook 2. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Ennals R (2001) Work life 2000: yearbook 3. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ennals R (2007) From slavery to citizenship. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  10. Gautun H and Hagen K (2010) How do middle-aged employees combine work with caring for elderly parents? In Community, Work & Family. 2011, 1_17, iFirst articleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hilsen AI, Ennals R (2005) Age, mobility and knowledge: an action research approach. AI Soc 19(4):552–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hilsen AI, Ennals R (2009) Virtual links: intergenerational learning and experience sharing across age divides and distances. AI Soc 23(1):33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffmann F, Rodrigues R (2010) Informal carers: who takes care of them? Policy Brief April 2010. European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  14. Holte HH, Hilsen AI (2010) Kvinners holdninger til tidligpensjonering. AFI-notat. Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet, OsloGoogle Scholar
  15. Hutchins D (2008) Hoshin Kanri: the strategic approach to continuous improvement. Gower, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  16. Ilmarinen J (2006) The ageing workforce: challenges for occupational health. Occup Med 56(6):362–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ilmarinen J, Rantanen J (1999) Promotion of work ability during ageing. AM J Ind Med 36(1):21–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ishikawa K (1990) Introduction to quality control. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Judt T (2010) Ill fares the land. Allen Lane, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Karasek R, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work: stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Kilbom A (1999) Ageing of the workforce. In: Ennals R (ed) Work life 2000: yearbook 1. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Marmot M (2004) Status syndrome. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Midtsundstad T (2009) Går vi av tidlig for å pleie mor? I Søkelys på arbeidslivet nr.2 2009Google Scholar
  24. Mooney A, Statham J, Simon A (2002) The pivot generation: informal care and work after fifty. Policy Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  25. Steinum T, Hilsen AI, Bull H (2007) Kunnskapsstatus for programmet FARVE (forsøksmidler arbeid og velferd)—Tema: Å øke den gjennomsnittlige avgangsalderen. AFI-notat 10/2007. Arbeidsforsknings-instituttet, OsloGoogle Scholar
  26. Totterdill P, Ennals R, Exton R (2012) Workplace innovation: the challenge for public policy. Gower, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  27. Weyman A (2009) The social and economic benefits of improving the quality of working lives of older workers and employees with established health conditions. In: Whitfield K (ed) Employee well-being and working life: towards an evidence-based policy agenda. ESRC and HSE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilkinson R, Pickett K (2010) The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Willetts D (2010) The pinch. Atlantic, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kingston Business SchoolKingston UniversityKingston Hill, KingstonUK
  2. 2.Fafo Institute for Labour and Social ResearchTøyen, OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations