This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Tirtza Even, private communication, April 2002.
I use compact mindful of its topological meaning: closed and bounded in a complete topological space.
Poetry versus spectacle? As an exercise for the reader, consider the following two examples of architectural scale public installation events: Rafael Lozano-Hammer and Brian Massumi's HUMO: Huge and Mobile, exhibited at the Ars Electronica festival in Linz, Austria, February 3–7, 2003; and Elizabeth Diller and Ricardo Scofidio’s Blur built for the Swiss Expo in 2002. HUMO, mounted what was then the world's most powerful projector on the back of a pick-up truck, to project 60 × 60 m images onto buildings, malls, advertising billboards, etc. in unannounced and unregulated fashion. In a different scale of ephemerality and visibility, Diller and Scofidio’s Blur was a varying cloud 300 feet wide by 200 feet deep by 75 feet high formed out of mist shaped from 31,500 high pressure hoses drawing water from Lake Neuchatel. (Diller and Scofidio 2002) How do these work as poetry or spectacle?
Helga Wild, private communication, March 1997.
Thanks to Tore Nielsen, Ph.D., Director, Dream and Nightmare Laboratory, Hopital Sacre-Coeur; Professeur titulaire, Département de psychiatrie, Université de Montréa, Montreal, Canada.
Alexander C (1979) A timeless way of building. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Alexander C (2002–2004) The nature of order, 4 vols. Center for Environmental Structure, Berkeley
Austin J (1975) How to do things with words, 2nd edn. The William James Lectures 1955. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Debord G [1994 (1967)] The society of the spectacle. Zone Books, New York
Deleuze G [2006 (1988)] The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Continuum, London; New York
Deleuze G, Guattari F [1987 (1980)] A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Diller E, Scofidio R (2002) Blur: the making of nothing. Harry N. Abrams, New York
Eclats (1999) Temps fugace, temps précaire, Quaderns D’arquitectura I Urbanisme vol. 224 décembre. In: Ortega L, Mestre J, Bercedo I (eds) Editorial Formentera, S.A., Barcelona
Gins M, Arakawa S (2002) Architectural body. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa
Heidegger M (1951) Building dwelling thinking. In: Poetry, language, thought. HarperCollins Canada/Harper Trade, 2001
Hooper B (2002) Urban space, modernity, and masculinist desire: the utopian lusts of Le Corbusier. In: Bingaman A, Sanders L, Zorach R (eds) Embodied utopias: gender, social change, and the modern metropolis. Routledge, London
Jacobs J (1985) Cities and the wealth of nations: principles of economic life. Vintage Books, New York
Karatani K (1995) Architecture as metaphor: language, number, money, writing architecture. MIT Press, Cambridge
Lunn F (2008) Soft architecture (unpublished abstract)
Matta-Clark Gordon (2007) Gordon Matta Clark: you are the measure. Whitney Museum of American Art; Yale University Press, New Haven Connecticut
Searle J (1980) Speech act theory and pragmatics. D. Reidel, Dordrecht
Stengers I (2002) Beyond conversation: the risks of peace. In: Daniell A, Keller C (eds) Process and difference: between cosmological and poststructuralist postmodernisms. SUNY, New York
I compliment the energetic group of artists and critics who participated in the Topological Media Lab’s soft architecture seminar over years 2007--2009. Together with the contributors, we are grateful for the intellectual and artistic companionship offered by fellow travelers including Ann-Marie Korpi, Helga Wild, Patrick Harrop, Ayesha Hameed, Gabriel Levine, Michael Fortin, Toni Dove, Madeline Gins and Shusaku Arakawa, Erin Manning, Brian Massumi, and members of the TML, the Dream and Nightmare Lab, and the SenseLab.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sha, X.W. Minor architecture: poetic and speculative architectures in public space. AI & Soc 26, 113–122 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0290-6
- Public Space
- Computational Medium
- Architectural Scale
- Corporeal Experience
- Spatial Practice