, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 93–102 | Cite as

The ‘measure of a man’ and the ethos of hospitality: towards an ethical dwelling with technology

  • Lucas D. IntronaEmail author
Original Article


In this paper, I argue for the impossible possibility of an ethical dwelling with technology. In arguing for an ethical comportment in our dealing with technology, I am not only arguing for the consideration of the ethical implications of technology (which we already do) but also, and more importantly, for an ethics of technological artefacts qua technology. Thus, I attempt to argue for a decentering (or rather overcoming) of anthropocentric ethics, urging us to move beyond any centre, whatever it may be—anthropological, biological, etc. I argue that if we take ethics seriously we must admit that our measure cannot be that of man. To develop the argument, I use an episode in Star Trek where the fate of the highly sophisticated android Commander Data is to be decided. I show how the moral reasoning about Data remains anthropocentric but hints to other possibilities. I proceed to use the work of Derrida and Levinas (with some help from Heidegger) to suggest a possible way to think (and do) an ethos beyond traditional ethics—an ethics of hospitality in which we dwell in a community of those that have nothing in common.


Ethical Significance Ethical Relation Android Moral Worth Technological Artefact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Benso S (2000) The face of things. State University of New York, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  2. Brey P (2000) Disclosive computer ethics. Comput Soc 30(4):10–16Google Scholar
  3. Brown N (2007) The inorganic open: nanotechnology and physical being. Radic Philos 144:33–44Google Scholar
  4. Caputo J (1993) Against ethics. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Critchley S (1999) The ethics of deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  6. Davy BJ (2007) ‘An other face of ethics in levinas.’ Ethics Environ 12(1):39–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derrida J (1992) Force of the law: the “mystical foundation of authority”. In: Cornell D, Rosenfeld M, Carlson DG (eds) Deconstruction, the possibility of justice. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Derrida J (1999) Hospitality, justice and responsibility: a dialogue with Jacques Derrida. In: Kearney R, Dooley M (eds) Questioning ethics: contemporary debates in philosophy. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Derrida J (2002) On cosmopolitanism in cosmopolitanism and forgiveness. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Floridi L (2003) On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere. Ethics Inf Technol 4(4):287–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodpaster KE (1978) On being morally considerable. J Philos 75:303–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haraway D (1991) Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Harman G (2002) Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Open Court Publishing, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Harman G (2005) Guerrilla metaphysics: phenomenology and the carpentry of things. Open Court Publishing, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Heidegger M (1977a) Martin Heidegger: basic writings (trans: David Farrell Krell). HarperCollins Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  16. Heidegger M (1977b) The question concerning technology, and other essays (trans: William Lovitt). Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes R (1991) The shock of the new: art and the century of change. BBC Books and Thames and Hudson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Husserl EE (1970/1929) Cartesian meditations: an introduction to phenomenology (trans: Cairns D). M. Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  19. Ihde D (1990) Technology and the lifeworld. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Introna LD (2001) Virtuality and morality: on (not) being disturbed by the other. Philos Contemp World 8(1):31–39Google Scholar
  21. Introna LD (2002) On the (Im)possibility of ethics in a mediated world. Inf Organ 12(2):71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Introna LD (2003) Workplace surveillance “is” unethical and unfair. Surveill Soc 1(2):210–216Google Scholar
  23. Introna LD, Nissenbaum H (2000) The internet as a democratic medium: why the politics of search engines matters. Inf Soc 16(3):169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Irwin S (2006) Technological other/quasi other: reflection on lived experience. Hum Stud 28(4):453–467CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Latour B (1993) We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Leopold A (1966) A sand county almanac. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Levinas E (1967) Totality and infinity: an essay on exteriority (trans: Alphonso Lingis). Duquesne University Press, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  28. Levinas E (1991[1974]) Otherwise than being or beyond essence (trans: Alphonso Lingis). Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  29. Levinas E (1996) “Ethics as first philosophy.” The Levinas Reader (Hand S (ed) trans: Michael B. Smith). Blackwell, London, pp 75–87Google Scholar
  30. Lingis A (1994) The community of those who have nothing in common. Indiana UP, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  31. Naess A (1995) Ecology, community and lifestyle. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Singer P (1977) Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals. Avon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Star Trek (2003) The next generation, “the measure of a man”, Transcript #40272-135, Located at, Accessed 26 January 2003
  34. Winner L (1980) Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109:121–136Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Study of Technology and OrganisationLancaster University Management SchoolLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations