AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 539–550 | Cite as

Ethical robots: the future can heed us

Original Article

Abstract

Bill Joy’s deep pessimism is now famous. “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us,” his defense of that pessimism, has been read by, it seems, everyone—and many of these readers, apparently, have been converted to the dark side, or rather more accurately, to the future-is-dark side. Fortunately (for us; unfortunately for Joy), the defense, at least the part of it that pertains to AI and robotics, fails. Ours may be a dark future, but we cannot know that on the basis of Joy’s reasoning. On the other hand, we ought to fear a good deal more than fear itself: we ought to fear not robots, but what some of us may do with robots.

References

  1. Arkoudas K, Bringsjord S (2005) Toward ethical robots via mechanized deontic logic. In: Technical report—machine ethics: papers from the AAAI fall symposium; FS–05–06, American Association of Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, pp 24–29Google Scholar
  2. Barr A (1983) Artificial intelligence: cognition as computation. In: Machlup F (eds) The study of information: interdisciplinary messages, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, pp 237–262Google Scholar
  3. Boolos GS, Jeffrey RC (1989) Computability and logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Bringsjord S (1992) What robots can and can’t be. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Bringsjord S (2000) A contrarian future for minds and machines Chronicle of higher education p B5. Reprinted in The Education Digest 66(6):31–33Google Scholar
  6. Bringsjord S, Arkoudas K (2004) The modal argument for hypercomputing minds. Theor Comput Sci 317:167–190MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Bringsjord S, Schimanski B (2003) What is artificial intelligence? psychometric AI as an answer. In: Proceedings of the 18th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI–03), San Francisco, CA, pp 887–893Google Scholar
  8. Bringsjord S, Schimanski B (2004) Pulling it all together via psychometric AI. In: Proceedings of the 2004 fall symposium: achieving human-level intelligence through integrated systems and Research, Menlo Park, CA, pp 9–16Google Scholar
  9. Bringsjord S, Zenzen M (2003) Superminds: people harness hypercomputation, and more. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietrich E (1990) Computationalism. Soc Epistemology 4(2):135–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fetzer J (1994) Mental algorithms: are minds computational systems? Pragmatics Cogn 2(1):1–29Google Scholar
  12. HarnadS (1991) Other bodies, other minds: a machine incarnation of an old philosophical problem. Minds Mach 1(1):43–54Google Scholar
  13. Haugeland J (1985) Artificial intelligence: the very idea. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. HofstadterD (1985) Waking up from the Boolean dream. In: metamagical themas: questing for the essence of mind and pattern, Bantam, New York, NY, pp 631–665Google Scholar
  15. Johnson-Laird P (1988) The computer and the mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. JoyW (2000) Why the future doesn’t need us. Wired 8(4)Google Scholar
  17. Kurzweil R (2000) The age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed human intelligence. Penguin USA, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  18. McCarthy J (2000) Free will–even for robots. J Experimental Theor Artif Intell 12(3):341–352MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Moor J (2005) The nature and importance of machine ethics. In: technical report—machine ethics: papers from the AAAI fall symposium; FS–05–06, American Association of Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  20. Moravec H (1999) Robot: mere machine to transcendant mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Neumann JV (1966) Theory of self-reproducing automata. Illinois University Press, ILGoogle Scholar
  22. Newell A (1980) Physical symbol systems. Cogn Sci 4:135–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parfit D (1986) Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Peters RS (ed) (1962) Body, man, and citizen: selections from hobbes’ writing. Collier, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Searle J (1980) Minds, brains, and programs. Behav and Brain Sci 3:417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simon H (1980) Cognitive science: the newest science of the artificial. Cogn Sci 4:33–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simon H (1981) Study of human intelligence by creating artificial intelligence. Am Sci 69(3):300–309Google Scholar
  28. Torrance S (2005) A robust view of machine ethics. In: Technical report—machine ethics: papers from the AAAI fall symposium; FS–05–06, American Association of Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  29. Turing A (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind LIX 236:433–460CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cognitive Science, Department of Computer ScienceRensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Rensselaer AI and Reasoning (RAIR) LabTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations