Skip to main content
Log in

Action research in user-centred product development

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technological development and increased international competition have imposed a significant burden on the product development function of many companies. The growing complexity of products demands a larger product development team with people having various competencies. Simultaneously the importance of good quality, usability and customisation of products is growing, and many companies want to involve customers and users directly in the development work. Both the complexity and quality demand new ways of working that support collaboration between people with various competencies, interests and responsibilities both inside and outside the company. This paper reports experiences from using action research to introduce new user-centred work practices in two commercial product development projects. The interventions varied. In the first project it was found rewarding to engage customers and users in workshops based on participatory inquiry and collaborative design. The design process was iterative and the workshops took place several times involving concept through detailed design. In the second project, new design representations are introduced. The experiences highlight the importance of creating and reifying insights in design representations and using these to both support collaboration, and create continuity in the project. The paper ends with a discussion of scientific rigor in action research and what the new work practices imply for the development team.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. WORM is just a name and is not an acronym of any kind.

  2. TEMP is just a name. It is not a acronym of any kind.

References

  • Argyris C, Schön DA (1991) Participatory action research and action science compared: a commentary. In: Whyte WF (ed) Participatory action research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp 85–96

  • Binder T (1999) Setting the stage for improvised video scenarios. CHI99 Conference, 15–20 May 1999, Pittsburgh, PA

  • Brandt E (2001) Event-driven product development: collaboration and learning. Dissertation, Technical University of Denmark

  • Brandt E, Binder T (1997) Customer/user workshops in product development—creating fora for collaboration between competencies. International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED97), Tampere, Finland

  • Clausen C, Lorentzen B (1992) Fra aktion til dialog – om kritisk handlingsorienteret forskning i Skandinavien (From action to dialogue (in Danish)). I Deltagelse i Teknologisk Udvikling. In: Participation in Technological Development. Forlaget Fremad, pp 14–40

  • Corbett JM, Rasmussen LB, Rauner F (1991) Crossing the border: the social and engineering design of computer integrated manufacturing systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn P (1988) Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm

  • Greenbaum J, Kyng M (eds) (1991) Design at work: corporate design of computer systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson K (1999) On line and on paper: visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in design engineering, MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzara GF (1991) Shifting stories: learning from a reflective experiment in a design process. In: Schön DA (ed) The reflective turn—case studies in and on educational practice. Teachers College Press, pp 285–320

  • Latour B (1990) Drawing things together. In: Lynch M, Woolgar S (eds) Representations in scientific practice. MIT Press, Boston

  • Schuler D, Namioka A (eds) (1993) Participatory design—principles and practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

  • Star SL (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: heterogeneous problem-solving, boundary objects and distributed artificial intelligence. In: Kuhn and Gasser (eds)The distributed artificial intelligence, vol. 2. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA, pp 37–54

  • Star SL (1995) The politics of formal representations: wizards, gurus, and organizational complexity. In: Star SL (ed) Ecologies of knowledge, work and politics in science and technology. State University of New York Press, Albany

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice—learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press

  • Whyte WF (ed) (1991) Participatory action research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Brandt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brandt, E. Action research in user-centred product development. AI & Soc 18, 113–133 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-003-0271-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-003-0271-0

Keywords

Navigation