Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Möglichkeiten der ambulanten Schulterendoprothetik

Possibilities for outpatient shoulder arthroplasty

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Arthroskopie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Im Rahmen der allgemeinen Bestrebungen zur Ambulantisierung des Gesundheitssystems und der entsprechenden ökonomischen Zwänge werden zunehmend Operationen als ambulante Eingriffe durchgeführt. Diese Bestrebung zeigt sich auch für die Schulterendoprothetik. Erste Daten zeigen hier die grundsätzliche Machbarkeit auf. Es finden sich jedoch noch systemimmanente Probleme, die v. a. eine noch geringe Akzeptanz der Patienten im europäischen Gesundheitssystem begründen.

Abstract

Within the framework of the general endeavors towards outpatient treatment aiming at more efficiency and cost reduction within the healthcare system, surgical interventions are performed increasingly more as outpatient procedures. This endeavor is also evident for shoulder arthroplasty. The published literature has already demonstrated the basic feasibility; however, there are still immanent problems with the system, which explains the still low acceptance of patients within the European healthcare system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Abildgaard JT, Mclemore R, Hattrup SJ (2016) Tranexamic acid decreases blood loss in total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:1643–1648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed AF, Hantouly A, Toubasi A et al (2021) The safety of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop 45:697–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Basques BA, Erickson BJ, Leroux T et al (2017) Comparative outcomes of outpatient and inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of the medicare dataset. Bone Joint J 99-B:934–938

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bovonratwet P, Webb ML, Ondeck NT et al (2017) Definitional differences of ‘outpatient’ versus ‘inpatient’ THA and TKA can affect study outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:2917–2925

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brolin TJ, Throckmorton TW (2018) Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 49:73–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cimino AM, Hawkins JK, Mcgwin G et al (2021) Is outpatient shoulder arthroplasty safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30:1968–1976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cointat C, Gauci MO, Azar M et al (2021) Outpatient shoulder prostheses: feasibility, acceptance and safety. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 107:102913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ernstbrunner L, Andronic O, Grubhofer F et al (2019) Long-term results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff dysfunction: a systematic review of longitudinal outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28:774–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ernstbrunner L, Suter A, Catanzaro S et al (2017) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears before the age of 60 years: long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:1721–1729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fournier MN, Brolin TJ, Azar FM et al (2019) Identifying appropriate candidates for ambulatory outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: validation of a patient selection algorithm. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28:65–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goyal N, Chen AF, Padgett SE et al (2017) Otto aufranc award: a multicenter, randomized study of outpatient versus inpatient total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:364–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huddleston HP, Mehta N, Polce EM et al (2021) Complication rates and outcomes after outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. JSES Int 5:413–423

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lehtimaki K, Rasmussen JV, Mokka J et al (2018) Risk and risk factors for revision after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy and osteoarthritis: a Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27:1596–1601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leroux TS, Basques BA, Frank RM et al (2016) Outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: a population-based study comparing adverse event and readmission rates to inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:1780–1786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leroux TS, Zuke WA, Saltzman BM et al (2018) Safety and patient satisfaction of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Open Access 2:13–17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lovald ST, Ong KL, Malkani AL et al (2014) Complications, mortality, and costs for outpatient and short-stay total knee arthroplasty patients in comparison to standard-stay patients. J Arthroplasty 29:510–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meneghini RM, Ziemba-Davis M, Ishmael MK et al (2017) Safe selection of outpatient joint arthroplasty patients with medical risk stratification: the “outpatient arthroplasty risk assessment score”. J Arthroplasty 32:2325–2331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ode GE, Odum S, Connor PM et al (2020) Ambulatory versus inpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of trends, outcomes, and charges. JSES Int 4:127–132

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Knut Beitzel.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

K. Beitzel ist Berater für Arthrex und Medi.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Redaktion

T. Gensior, Neuss

R. Müller-Rath, Neuss

Hinweis des Verlags

Der Verlag bleibt in Hinblick auf geografische Zuordnungen und Gebietsbezeichnungen in veröffentlichten Karten und Institutsadressen neutral.

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beitzel, K. Möglichkeiten der ambulanten Schulterendoprothetik. Arthroskopie 37, 32–35 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00142-023-00648-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00142-023-00648-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation