Zusammenfassung
Für das femoroazetabuläre Impingement (FAI) ist charakteristisch, dass es durch Veränderungen der ossären Morphologie des Hüftgelenks zu einer typischen Konstellation von Labrum- und Knorpelverletzungen kommt, die im Verlauf zu einer Koxarthrose in einem relativ jungen Patientenkollektiv führen kann. Da es sich aber primär um ein klinisches Syndrom handelt, kann die Diagnose eines FAI nur zuverlässig gestellt werden, wenn die Morphometrie des Hüftgelenks sowie die Knorpel- und Labrumschäden in Zusammenschau mit dem klinischen Befund analysiert werden. Die Analyse der ossären Morphologie des Hüftgelenks erfolgt anhand der radiologischen Bildgebung. Die bildgebenden Kriterien und die möglichen Mess- und Analyseverfahren werden in diesem Beitrag zusammengefasst, aber auch deren Anwendung kritisch diskutiert, da die Verfahren Limitationen aufweisen und einige Veränderungen in der asymptomatischen Bevölkerung so häufig sind, dass der kausale Zusammenhang relativiert werden muss. Bezüglich der Diagnostik von Labrum- und Knorpelverletzungen sollen im Folgenden die aktuellen Standards vorgestellt werden.
Abstract
Femoroacetabular impingement is characterized by changes in the osseous morphology of the hip joint leading to a typical constellation of labral and cartilaginous injuries, which may lead to osteoarthritis in a relatively young patient population. As femoroacetabular impingement is primarily a clinical syndrome, the diagnosis can only be reliably established if the morphometric changes of the hip joint and the cartilaginous and labral injuries are analyzed in combination with the clinical symptoms. Analysis of the osseous morphology of the hip joint is based on radiological imaging. The imaging criteria and the possible qualitative findings and methods of measurement are summarized in this article. The application of the methods of measurement is critically discussed because the procedures have limitations and some changes in the asymptomatic population are so common that the causal relationship must be put into perspective. Current standards in the diagnostics of labral and cartilaginous injuries are presented.
Literatur
Armbuster TG, Guerra J, Resnick D et al (1978) The adult hip: an anatomic study. Part I: the bony landmarks. Radiology 128(1):1–10
Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R (2005) Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1012–1018
Dudda M, Albers C, Mamisch TC, Werlen S, Beck M (2009) Do normal radiographs exclude asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(3):651–659
Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH (2008) The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:264–272
Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M et al (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:112–120
Hack K, Di Primio G, Rakhra K, Beaulé PE (2010) Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(14):2436–2444
Ito K, Minka MA, Leunig M et al (2001) Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:171–176
Kakaty DK, Fischer AF, Hosalkar HS, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M (2010) The ischial spine sign: does pelvic tilt and rotation matter? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(3):769–774
Kalberer F, Sierra RJ, Madan SS, Ganz R, Leunig M (2008) Ischial spine projection into the pelvis : a new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:677–683
Kappe T, Kocak T, Neuerburg C, Lippacher S, Bieger R, Reichel H (2011) Reliability of radio-graphic signs for acetabular retroversion. Int Orthop 35(6):817–821
Leunig M, Beck M, Kalhor M et al (2005) Fibrocystic changes at ante- rosuperior femoral neck: prevalence in hips with femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology 236:237–246
Leunig M, Ganz R (2005) Femoroacetabuläres Impingement. Häufige Ursachen von zur Arthrose führenden Hüftbeschwerden. Unfallchirurg 108(9–10):12–17
Lohan DG, Seeger LL, Motamedi K, Hame S, Sayre J (2009) Cam-type femoral-acetabular impingement: is the alpha angle the best MR arthrography has to offer? Skeletal Radiol 38(9):855–862
Magee T (2015) Comparison of 3.0-T MR vs 3.0-T MR arthrography of the hip for detection of acetabular labral tears and chondral defects in the same patient population. Br J Radiol 88:20140817
Murgier J, Reina N, Cavaignac E, Espié A, Bayle-Iniguez X, Chiron P (2014) The frequency of sequelae of slipped upper femoral epiphysis in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Bone Joint J 96–B:724–729
Neumann M, Cui Q, Siebenrock KA, Beck M (2009) Impingement-free hip motion: the “normal” angle alpha after osteochondroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(3):699–703
Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH et al (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:556–560
Nouh MR, Schweitzer ME, Rybak L, Cohen J (2008) Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated? AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(5):1260–1262
Pfirrmann CW, Duc SR, Zanetti M, Dora C, Hodler J (2008) MR arthrography of acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular cam impingement. Radiology 249(1):236–241
Pfirrmann CW, Mengiardi B, Dora C et al (2006) Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology 240:778–785
Pollard TC, Villar RN, Norton MR et al (2010) Femoroacetabular impingement and classification of the cam deformity: the reference interval in normal hips. Acta Orthop 81(1):134–141
Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaulé PE (2009) Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:660–665
Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K (1999) Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:281–288
Schäeffeler C, Wörtler K (2012) Impingementsyndrom des Hüftgelenkes. Radiol Up2date 12(1):35–51
Schmaranzer F, Klauser K, Kogler M, Henninger D, Forstner T, Reichkendler M, Schmaranzer F (2015) Diagnostic performance of direct traction MR arthrography of the hip: detection of chondral and labral lesions with arthroscopic comparison. Eur Radiol 25(6):1721–1730
Siebenrock KA, Wahab KHA, Werlen S, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R (2004) Abnormal extension of the femoral head epiphysis as a cause of cam impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:54–60
Sutter R, Zanetti M, Pfirrmann CW (2012) New developments in hip imaging. Radiology 264(3):651–667
Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE (2007) Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis—what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1540–1552
Tannast M, Goricki D, Beck M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA (2008) Hip damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:273–280
Waldt S, Eiber M, Wörtler K (2011) Messverfahren in der muskuloskelettalen Radiologie. Thieme, Stuttgart
Werner CM, Copeland CE, Stromberg J, Ruckstuhl T (2010) Correlation of the cross-over ratio of the cross-over sign on conventional pelvic radiographs with computed tomog- raphy retroversion measurements. Skeletal Radiol 39(7):655–660
Tannast M, Goricki D, Beck M et al (2008) Hip damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:273–280
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
S. Waldt gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von der Autorin durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waldt, S. Bildgebung des Hüftgelenks beim femoroazetabulären Impingement. Arthroskopie 32, 86–94 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00142-018-0254-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00142-018-0254-2