Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vorderer Kreuzbandersatz mit Semitendinosus-Grazilis-Sehne 4fach vs. Lig. patellae vs. funktioneller Behandlung

Klinische Ergebnisse einer prospektiv randomisierten Studie nach vorderer Kreuzbandruptur

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Arthroskopie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Eine Ruptur des vorderen Kreuzbands beim sportlich aktiven Patienten sollte mit einer Stabilisierungsoperation behandelt werden. Die beiden Operationsmethoden Semitendinosus-Grazilis-Sehnen-Plastik (SGSP) 4fach und Lig.-patellae-Plastik (LPP) führen zu guten Ergebnissen, wobei in unserer Untersuchung Vorteile für die SGSP 4fach vorhanden sind. Die funktionelle Therapie wurde von den Patienten wegen bestehender Auslassphänomene nicht akzeptiert. Die SGSP 4fach führt zu besseren Ergebnissen in der Sprungkraft, im OAK- und im IKDC-Score und zu weniger Problemen an der Transplantatentnahmestelle. Bezüglich der "passiven Stabilität", "Muskelmasse", "Maximalkraft", "range of motion—ROM", "subjektivem Beschwerdebild", und der "zyklischen Bewegungsschnelligkeit" konnte kein Unterschied zwischen den Operationsmethoden gezeigt werden. In der "Gleichgewichtsfähigkeit" zeigte sich ein signifikanter Unterschied zugunsten der LPP-Gruppe. Insgesamt hat bei uns die SGSP 4fach die LPP als "Goldstandard" abgelöst.

Abstract

We find that in general a rupture of the ACL in sportive active patients should be stabilized operatively. Both BTB and hamstring reconstruction technique show good results. The quadrouple-hamstring reconstruction however shows certain advantages in our study. Due to persistant instabillity functional treatment was not accepted by our patients. Hamstring reconstruction shows less donorsite morbidity and better restults in OAK and IKDC score and in jumping strength. No difference was noted in passive stability, musclemass, maximal strength, ROM, cyclic acceleration and patient content. The BTB group had a better balance activity level. Over all the hamstring reconstruction has become the "gold standard" for ACL reconstruction for us.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R et al. (1993) Patellofemoral problems after intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 288:195–204

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aglietti PB, Zaccherotti R, De Biase P (1994) Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 222:211–217

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett GR, Noojin FK, Hartzog CW, Nash CR (2002) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: a comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 181:46–54

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown CH jr, Steiner ME et al. (1993) The use of hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Technique and results. Clin Sports Med 124:723–756

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caborn DN, Johnson BM (1993) The natural history of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. A review. Clin Sports Med 124:625–636

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, Pinczewski LA (1999) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 274:444–454

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engstrom B, Gornitzka J et al. (1993) Knee function after anterior cruciate ligament ruptures treated conservatively. Internat Orthop 174:208–213

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eriksson KLH, Wredmark T, Hamberg P (1999) Semitendinosus tendon regeneration after harvesting for ACL reconstruction. A prospective MRI study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 74:220–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feagin JAWRP, Lambert KL, Mott HW, Cunningham RR (1997) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Bone-patella tendon-bone versus semitendinosus anatomic reconstruction. Clin Orthop 341:69–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hiemstra LAWS, MacDonald PB, Kriellaars DJ (2000) Knee strength deficits after hamstring tendon and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 328:1472–1479

    Google Scholar 

  11. Iwasa JOM, Adachi N, Tobita M, Katsube K, Uchio Y (2000) Proprioceptive improvement in knees with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop 381:168–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kandziora F, Herresthal J, Jäger A, Schöttle H, Zichner L (1998) Arthroskopische Rekonstruktion des vorderen Kreuzbandes mit der gedoppelten Semitendinosussehne. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgebiete 136:330–336

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keene G (2000) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 283:438

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marder RAR jr, Carroll M (1991) Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med 195:478–484

    Google Scholar 

  15. Muller BRS, Kohn D, Seil R (2000) Donor site problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the middle third of the patellar ligament. Unfallchirurg 1038:662–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Neusel E, Maibaum S et al. (1993) Results of follow-up of conservatively treated isolated fresh anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Akt Traumatol 234:200–206

    Google Scholar 

  17. Otero AL, Hutcheson L (1993) A comparison of the doubled semitendinosus/gracilis and central third of the patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 92:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  18. Papandrea PVMC, Ferretti A, Conteduca F (2000) Regeneration of the semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Evaluation using ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med 284:556–561

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spicer DDBSE, Unwin AJ, Allum RL (2000) Anterior knee symptoms after four-strand hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 85:286–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Straub T, Hunter RE (1988) Acute anterior cruciate ligament repair. Clin Orthop 227:238–250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Viola RVR (1999) Three cases of patella fracture in 1,320 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Arthroscopy 151:93–97

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wasilewski SA, Covall DJ et al. (1993) Effect of surgical timing on recovery and associated injuries after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 213:338–342

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yasuda KTJ, Ohkoshi Y, Tanabe Y, Kaneda K (1995) Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilus tendons. Am J Sports Med 23:706–713

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zatterstrom RFT, Lindstrand A, Moritz U (2000) Rehabilitation following acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries-a 12-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports 103:156–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unfallkrankenhaus Salzburg

    G. Oberthaler, W. Marth, C. Primavesi & A. Trost

  2. Sportuniversität Salzburg

    A. Aichner

  3. UKH Salzburg, Dr.-Franz-Rehrl-Platz 5, 5020, Salzburg, Österreich

    G. Oberthaler

Authors
  1. G. Oberthaler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Aichner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. Marth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Primavesi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Trost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Oberthaler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oberthaler, G., Aichner, A., Marth, W. et al. Vorderer Kreuzbandersatz mit Semitendinosus-Grazilis-Sehne 4fach vs. Lig. patellae vs. funktioneller Behandlung. Arthroskopie 16, 255–261 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00142-003-0225-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00142-003-0225-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation