Advertisement

Machine Vision and Applications

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1469–1488 | Cite as

Fast automatic medical image segmentation based on spatial kernel fuzzy c-means on level set method

  • Siavash Alipour
  • Jamshid ShanbehzadehEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Fast two-cycle (FTC) model is an efficient and the fastest Level set image segmentation. But, its performance is highly dependent on appropriate manual initialization. This paper proposes a new algorithm by combining a spatially constrained kernel-based fuzzy c-means (SKFCM) algorithm and an FTC model to overcome the mentioned problem. The approach consists of two successive stages. First, the SKFCM makes a rough segmentation to select the initial contour automatically. Then, a fuzzy membership matrix of the region of interest, which is generated by the SKFCM, is used in the next stage to produce an initial contour. Eventually, the FTC scheme segments the image by a curve evolution based on the level set. Moreover, the fuzzy membership degree from the SKFCM is incorporated into the fidelity term of the Chan–Vese model to improve the robustness and accuracy, and it is utilized for the data-dependent speed term of the FTC. A performance evaluation of the proposed algorithm is carried out on the synthetic and real images. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has advantages in accuracy, computational time and robustness against noise in comparison with the KFCM, the SKFCM, the hybrid model of the KFCM and the FTC, and five different level set methods on medical image segmentation.

Keywords

Medical image segmentation Level set method Fast two cycle Spatial kernel fuzzy c-means Chan–Vese 

References

  1. 1.
    Bankman, I. (ed.): Handbook of Medical Image Processing and Analysis, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Larie, S., Abukmeil, S.: Brain abnormality in schizophrenia: a systematic and quantitative review of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging studies. J. Psych. 172, 110–120 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Worth, A.J., Makris, N., Caviness, V.S., Kennedy, D.N.: Neuroanatomical segmentation in MRI: technological objectives. Int. J. Patt. Recognit. Artif. Intell. 11, 1161–1187 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davatzikos, C.A., Prince, J.L.: An active contour model for mapping the cortex. IEEE Trans. Med. Image 14, 65–80 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Srinivasan, A., Sundaram, A.: Applications of deformable models for in-depth analysis and feature extraction from medical images—a review. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 23, 296–318 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dietenbeck, T., Alessandrini, M., Friboulet, D., Bernard, O.: CREASEG: a free software for the evaluation of image segmentation algorithms based on level-set. In: Image Processing (ICIP), 17th IEEE International Conference on Hong Kong, pp. 665–668 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu, C., Pham, D., Prince, J.L.: Image Segmentation Using Deformable Models. Handbook of Medical Imaging, Medical Image Processing and Analysis, vol. 2, pp. 129–174 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suri, J.S., Kecheng, L., Sameer, S., Swamy, N.L., Xiaolan, Z., Reden, L.: Shape recovery algorithms using level sets in 2-D/3-D medical imagery: a state-of-the-art review. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 6, 8–28 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caselles, V., Catté, F., Coll, T., Dibos, F.: A geometric model for active contours in image processing. Numerische Mathematik 66, 1–31 (1993)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rastgarpour, M., Alipour, S., Shanbehzadeh, J.: Improved fast two cycle by using KFCM clustering for image segmentation. MultiConf. Eng. Comput. Sci. 1, 678–682 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shi, Y., Karl, W.C.: A real-time algorithm for the approximation of level-set-based curve evolution. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 17, 645–656 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caselles, V., Kimmel, R., Sapiro, G.: Geodesic active contours. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 22, 61–79 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chan, T.F., Vese, L.A.: Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10, 266–277 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, C., Xu, C., Gui, C., Fox, M.D.: Level set evolution without re-initialization: a new variational formulation. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. 1, 430–436 (2005) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bezdek, J.C.: Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms (1981)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ahmed, M.N., Yamany, S.M., Mohamed, N., Farag, A.A., Moriarty, T.: A modified fuzzy C-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21(3), 193–199 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cai, W., Chen, S., Zhang, D.: Fast and robust fuzzy c-means clustering algorithms incorporating local information for image segmentation. Pattern Recognit. 40(3), 825–838 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bezdek, J.C., Hall, L.O., Clarke, L.P.: Review of MR image segmentation techniques using pattern recognition. Med. Phys. 20, 1033–1048 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang, D.-Q., Chen, S.-C.: A novel kernelized fuzzy c-means algorithm with application in medical image segmentation. Artif. Intell. Med. 32(1), 37–50 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Merriman, B., Bence, J., Osher, S., Taylor, J.: Diffusion Generated Motion by Mean Curvature. Dept. of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles (1992)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sethian, J.A. (ed.): Fast Marching Methods and Level Set Methods Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision and Materials Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Merriman, B., Bence, J.K., Osher, S.J.: Motion of multiple junctions: a level set approach. J. Comput. Phys. 112, 334–363 (1994)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Conte, D., Tufano, F.: Segmenting wrist bone tissue: enhancements to level set algorithm. In: IEEE International Workshop on, Medical Measurements and Applications, 2009. MeMeA 2009. pp. 177–182 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dice, L.: Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26, 297–302 (1945)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bernard, O., Friboulet, D., Thévenaz, P., Fellow, M.: Variational B-spline level-set: a linear filtering approach for fast deformable model evolution. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18, 1179–1191 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nadernejad, E., Sharifzadeh, S.: A new method for image segmentation based on Fuzzy C-means algorithm on pixonal images formed by bilateral filtering. Signal Image Video Process. 7(5), 855–863 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hu, S., Hoffman, E.A., Reinhardt, J.M.: Automatic lung segmentation for accurate quantitation of volumetric X-ray CT images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20(6) (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chan, R., Yang, H., Zeng, T.: A two-stage image segmentation method for BLURRY images with poisson or multiplicative gamma noise. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Droskey, M., Meyerz, B., Rumpfy, M., Schallerz, K.: An adaptive level set method for medical image segmentation. Inf. Process. Med. Imaging 2082, 416–422 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li, C., Kao, C.-Y., Gore, jC, Ding, Z.: Minimization of region-scalable fitting energy for image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 17, 1940–1949 (2008) Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    The MedPix\(^{\textregistered }\) Database, http://rad.usuhs.mil/medpix/parent.php3?mode=home_page#top
  32. 32.
    Yezzi, A., Kichenassamy, S., Kumar, A., Olver, P., Tannenbaum, A.: A Geometric snake model for segmentation of medical imagery. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16(2) (1997)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bezdek, J.C., Keller, J., Krishnapuram, R., Pal, N.: Fuzzy Models and Algorithms for Pattern Recognition and Image Processing. Kluwer, Boston (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lankton, S., Tannenbaum, A.: Localizing region-based active contours. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 17, 2029–2039 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringKharazmi UniversityTehranI. R. Iran

Personalised recommendations