Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of social deprivation on intensive care outcome

  • ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To assess the influence of social deprivation on outcome from admission to the intensive care unit. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary referral centre mixed adult intensive care unit (ICU). Patients: Seven hundred seventy-four consecutive admissions to the ICU over a 2-year period. Interventions: None.¶Measurements and results: Age, admission illness severity measured by APACHE II score, predicted hospital mortality, actual hospital mortality and length of ICU stay were obtained for all patients. Social deprivation was assessed by Carstairs Score for postcode sector of residence categorised from 1 (most affluent ) to 7 (most deprived). Carstairs Scores were obtained for 716 patients. When patients in categories 6 and 7 were compared with the others there were no significant differences in age, admission illness severity, predicted or actual hospital mortality and length of ICU stay. On multivariate analysis there was no evidence of an increased mortality risk for patients in categories 6 and 7 (p = 0.256, odds ratio 1.2, 95 % confidence interval 0.9–1.7). Conclusions: Social deprivation does not influence outcome in patients admitted to the ICU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 14 December 1999/Final revision received: 31 March 2000/Accepted: 6 April 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Findlay, J., Plenderleith, J. & Schroeder, D. Influence of social deprivation on intensive care outcome. Intensive Care Med 26, 929–933 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340051283

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340051283

Navigation