Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: Assessment of and effect of training on reliability of esophageal Doppler (ED) versus thermodilution (TD) for cardiac output (CO) measurement.

Design: Prospective study.

Setting: Intensive care unit of a university hospital.

Patients: 64 consecutive critically ill patients requiring a pulmonary artery catheter, sedation, and mechanical ventilation.

Interventions: Esophageal Doppler CO measurements were performed by the same operator, whereas TD CO measurements were carried out by other independent operators. A training period involving the first 12 patients made the operator self-confident. In the remaining patients, the reliability of ED was assessed (evaluation period), using correlation coefficients and the Bland and Altman diagram. Between training and evaluation periods, correlation coefficients, biases, and limits of agreement were compared.

Measurements and results: During training and evaluation periods, 107 and 320 CO measurements were performed in 11 out of 12 patients and in 49 out of 52 patients, respectively. Continuous CO monitoring was achieved in 6 out of 11 patients and in 38 out of 49 patients during training and evaluation periods, respectively. Between the two periods, correlation coefficients increased from 0.53 to 0.89 (p < 0.001), bias decreased from 1.2 to 0.1 l.min−1 (p < 0.001), and limits of agreement decreased from 3.2 to 2.2 l.min−1 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: A period of training involving no more than 12 patients is probably required to ensure reliability of CO measurement by ED.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Pulmonary Artery Catheter (1993) Practice guidelines for pulmonary artery catheterization. Anesthesiology 78: 380–394

    Google Scholar 

  2. Forrester JS, Ganz W, Diamond G, MacHigh T, Chonette DW, Swan HJC (1972) Thermodilution cardiac output determination with a single flow directed catheter. Am Heart J 83: 306–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shah KB, Rao TLK, Laughlin S, El-Etr AA (1984) A review of pulmonary artery catheterization in 6,245 patients. Anesthesiology 61: 271–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Iberti TJ, Fisher EP, Leibowitz AB, Panacek EA, Silverstein JH, Alberston TE and The Pulmonary Artery Catheter Group (1992) A multicenter study of physicians’ knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter. JAMA 264: 2928–2932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Steingrub JS, Celoria G, Vickers-Lahti M, Teres O, Bria W (1991) Therapeutic impact of pulmonary artery catheterization in a medical/surgical ICU. Chest 99:1451–1455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Darmon PL, Hillel A, Mogtader A, Mindich D, Thys D (1994) Cardiac output by transesophageal echocardiography using continuous-wave Doppler across the aortic valve. Anesthesiology 80: 796–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gorcsan J (1995) Quantification of left ventricular function using transesophageal echocardiography. In: Vincent JL (ed) Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine. Springer, Brussels, pp 575–592

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cahalan MK, Foster E (1995) Training in transesophageal echocardiography: in the lab or on the job? Anesth Analg 81:217–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Savage RM, Licina MG, Koch CG, Hearn CJ, Thomas JD, Starr NJ, Stewart WJ (1995) Educational program for intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg 81: 399–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunstman LL, Stewart DK, Barnes SR, Franklin SB, Colocousis JS, Hessel EA (1983) Non invasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in man. Clinical validation. Circulation 67: 593–602

    Google Scholar 

  11. Singer M, Clarke J, Bennett D (1989) Continuous hemodynamic monitoring by esophageal Doppler. Crit Care Med 17: 447–452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Singer M (1993) Esophageal Doppler monitoring of aortic blood flow: beat-by-beat CO monitoring. Int Anesthesiol Clin 31: 99–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kristensen BD, Goldbert SJ (1987) Number of CO required to accurately determine mean velocity of blood flow in the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk. Am J Cardiol 60: 746–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamantia K, O’Connor T, Barash PG (1990) Comparing methods of measurement: an alternative approach. Anesthesiology 72: 781–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Siegel LC, Pearl RG (1992) Noninvasive cardiac output measurement: troubled technologies and troubled studies. Anesth Analg 74: 790–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I: 307–310

  17. Mark JB, Steinbrook RA, Gugino LD, Maddi R, Hartwell B, Shemin R, Disesa V, Rida WN (1986) Continuous noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output with esophageal Doppler ultrasound during cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 65:1013–1020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Freund PR (1987) Transesophageal Doppler scanning versus thermodilution during general anesthesia. An initial comparison of cardiac output techniques. Am J Surg 153: 490–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Perrino AC, Fleming J, Lamantia KR (1990) Transesophageal Doppler ultrasonography: evidence for improved cardiac output monitoring. Anesth Analg 71: 651–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spahn DR, Schmid ER, Tornic M, Jenni R, von Segesser L, Turina M, Baetscher A (1990) Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac out put after cardiac surgery: clinical validation. J Cardiothorac Vase Anesth 4: 46–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Perrino AC, Fleming J, Lamantia KR (1991) Transesophageal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: performance during aortic reconstructive surgery. Anesth Analg 73: 705–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmid ER, Spahn DR, Tornic M (1993) Reliability of a new generation transesophageal Doppler device for cardiac output monitoring. Anesth Analg 77: 971–979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lavandier B, Cathignol D, Muchada R, Bui Xuan B, Motin J (1985) Noninvasive aortic blood flow measurement using an intraesophageal probe. Ultrasound Med Biol 11: 451–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Klotz KF, Klingsiek S, Singer M, Wenk H, Eleftheriadis S, Kuppe H, Schmucker P (1995) Continuous measurement of cardiac output during aortic cross-clamping by the esophageal Doppler monitor ODM 1. Br J Anaesth 74: 655–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nishikawa T, Dohi S (1993) Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution. Can J Anaesth 40: 142–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Renner LE, Morton MJ, Sakuma GY (1993) Indicator amount, temperature, and intrinsic cardiac output affect thermodilution cardiac output accuracy and reproducibility. Crit Care Med 21: 586–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lefrant JY, Bruelle P, Ripart J, Ibanez F, Aya G, Peray P, Saïssi G, de La Coussaye JE, Eledjam JJ (1995) Cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients: comparison of continuous and conventional thermodilution techniques. Can J Anaesth 42: 972–976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stetz CW, Miller RG, Kelly GE, Raffin TA (1982) Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 126:1001–1004

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Krishnamurthy B, McMurray TJ, McClean E (1997) The peri-operative use of the esophageal Doppler monitor in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularisation. Anaesthesia 52: 624–629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith MD, Cassidy MJ, Souther S, Morris EJ, Sapin PM, Johnson SB, Kearney PA (1995) Transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of traumatic rupture of the aorta. N Engl J Med 332: 356–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Daniel WG, Mügge A (1995) Transesophageal echocardiography. N Engl J Med 332: 1268–1279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Practice guidelines for perioperative transesophageal echocardiography (1996) A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists task force on transesophageal echocardiography. Anesthesiology 84: 986–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lefrant, J.Y., Bruelle, P., Aya, A.G.M. et al. Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 24, 347–352 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050578

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050578

Key words

Navigation