References
Bruno RR, Wollborn J, Fengler K et al (2023) Direct assessment of microcirculation in shock: a randomized-controlled multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 49:645–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07098-5
Duranteau J, De Backer D, Donadello K et al (2023) The future of intensive care: the study of the microcirculation will help to guide our therapies. Crit Care 27:190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04474-x
Hilty MP, Akin S, Boerma C et al (2020) Automated algorithm analysis of sublingual microcirculation in an international multicentral database identifies alterations associated with disease and mechanism of resuscitation. Crit Care Med 48:e864–e875. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004491
Pinsky MR, Cecconi M, Chew MS et al (2022) Effective hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care Lond Engl 26:294. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04173-z
Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M et al (2014) Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European society of intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 40:1795–1815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
MPH and CI hold a patent on the use of AI to analyze microcirculatory images, and we have developed an automated microcirculatory analysis software platform. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This comment refers to the article available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07098-5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hilty, M.P., Duranteau, J., Montomoli, J. et al. A microcirculation-guided trial doomed to fail. Intensive Care Med 49, 1557–1558 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07223-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07223-4