Skip to main content

Driving pressure: pitfalls of methods that do not use esophageal pressure measurement. Author’s reply

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Ono S (2023) Driving pressure: pitfalls of methods that do not use esophageal pressure measurement. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07155-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roca O, Goligher EC, Amato MBP (2023) Driving pressure: applying the concept at the bedside. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07071-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertoni M, Telias I, Urner M, Long M, Del Sorbo L, Fan E, Sinderby C, Beck J, Liu L, Qiu H, Wong J, Slutsky AS, Ferguson ND, Brochard LJ, Goligher EC (2019) A novel non-invasive method to detect excessively high respiratory effort and dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 23:346

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. de Vries HJ, Tuinman PR, Jonkman AH, Liu L, Qiu H, Girbes ARJ, Zhang Y, de Man AME, de Grooth HJ, Heunks L (2023) Performance of noninvasive airway occlusion maneuvers to assess lung stress and diaphragm effort in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Anesthesiology 138:274–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coppola S, Caccioppola A, Froio S, Ferrari E, Gotti M, Formenti P, Chiumello D (2019) Dynamic hyperinflation and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure in ARDS patients. Crit Care 23:375

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oriol Roca.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

OR reports receiving a research grant from Hamilton Medical AG and Fihser&Paykel Healthcare Ltd, speaker fees from Hamilton Medical AG, Fisher&Paykel Healthcare Ltd, Aerogen Ltd and Ambu, and non-financial research support from Timpel; all outside the submitted work. EG reports research funding from the Canadian Institute of Health Research and the National Sanitarium Association for research related to the submitted work. He also reports receiving personal fees from Getinge, Vyaire, BioAge, LungPacer, and Zoll for work unrelated to the submitted work. MBPA reports that, in the last 5 years, his laboratory has received research grants to investigate mechanical ventilation from Covidien/Medtronics, Orange Med/Nihon Koden, and MagnaMed S.A. He also received research grants from Timpel S.A, to investigate Electrical Impedance Tomography. MBPA is a minority shareholder in Timpel.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This comment refers to the article available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07071-2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roca, O., Goligher, E.C. & Amato, M.B.P. Driving pressure: pitfalls of methods that do not use esophageal pressure measurement. Author’s reply. Intensive Care Med 49, 1149–1150 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07167-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07167-9